[CyberAnt]

So .. what do you think is the NYT's motive in posting this information now ..??

They must have some sleazy motive behing this .. right ..??

[jveritas]

Of course they do, it is the treasonous New York Times after all. They want to tell us that President Bush and his administration made a huge mistake by publishing these documents on the Internet and of course this thread destroys their claim and not only that but they have caused themselves a lot of damage because here come the other documents that prove Saddam was working on WMD program including nuclear program but of course the NYT wants to dismiss these documents.

[Pukin Dog]

Why, you ask?

Because the NY Times panicked, thats why.

Because on November 7th, the nation is going to discover that we have been fed bogus polling data all year.

Because unless something changes drastically, Republicans are going to retain control of Congress.

The NY Times panicked, jumped the shark, and they are going down.

[holden]

They must have some sleazy motive behing this .. right ..??

As strategerist was showing us in the early (< #116) posts of the "Shocker NYT" thread, this is not about facts, but about what the NYT's "interpretation" was intended to be, despite the "surprisingly poorly-written and confusing article."

We're "mistaken" (again) if we try to analyze the facts on their own merits without their tar mounds of editorializing spin.

I'm left to believe they think they've timed this in nuanced fashion, such that the wave of bluster will have an edge in their favor, come Tuesday.

As with so many of their recent choices, they "chose poorly" this time, too.

HF