Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

JVERITAS Responds to the 11/3 NYT Article Regarding Iraq Nuclear Program.
November 3rd 2006 | jveritas

Posted on 11/02/2006 8:48:45 PM PST by jveritas

Edited on 11/02/2006 11:06:31 PM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]

The New York Times article to be published on November 3rd 2006 is about the US putting some captured Iraqi documents on the Foreign Military Intelligence Office (FMSO) website that talks about what the NYT and the IAEA call sensitive information from Iraq 1996 "Full, Final, and Complete Declaration FFCD presented to the UN and IAEA in 1996 and that talks about Iraq nuclear clandestine program. The IAEA and the New York Times claim that Iran may be using some of the technology in this FFCD which is a laughable idea as shown below.

That is from the IAEA website regardinf their report on Iraq FFCD presented to them by the Iraqis in 1996: “ 3. On 7 September 1996 in Baghdad Iraq delivered what it considered to be the definitive version of the "Full, Final, and Complete Declaration" (FFCD-F) of the Iraqi clandestine nuclear programme. The IAEA with the assistance of technical experts from Member States undertook a comprehensive review of the document.” Link: http://www.iaea.org/About/Policy/GC/GC41/Documents/gc41-20.html

So the FFCD was discussed with member states experts of the IAEA. There are 142 members in the IAEA including Iran. I am not saying that the IAEA discussed the Iraqi FFCD with Iranians but the FFCD was not such a secret document and the Iranians would have been able to access it in one way or another if it really provide them with any useful information.

What is important in this whole issue is that the New York Times has ridiculed these documents all along and never payed attention to them including the very important documents that show Saddam regime never stopped its programs related to WMD including nuclear programs. These documents were translated and posted here on FR.

On the subject of nuclear program, I translated and posted a document last month dated January 2001 that shows with a shadow of doubt that Saddam was personally involved with his nuclear scientist to re-build the nuclear program. In this document it states that Saddam personally approved his Iraqi Atomic Energy Agency to re-use nuclear equipments that include something called “Degussa Furnaces” that were used in the previous and prohibited Iraq nuclear program. These furnaces can be used to melt uranium and other nuclear related activities. The Degussa Vacuum furnaces were supplied to Iraq in the 1980’s by a German firm (Degussa AG based in Frankfurt Germany) and these furnaces later on became the subject of investigations of the German firm in the early 1990’s where the company claimed that they did not know that Iraq would have used them in its nuclear program.

The New York Times had an article in 1998 titled “An Iraqi Defector Warns of Iraq's Nuclear Weapons Research” where the Degussa furnaces were mentioned as part of “previous” Iraq nuclear program and the controversy surrounding the sale of these furnaces and the investigations later on(link: http://www-personal.umich.edu/~sanders/214/other/news/iraqi_defector.html ). The irony is that this is not only a New York Times article but also it was written by JUDITH MILLER and JAMES RISEN once of the worst accusers (liars) that the Bush administration lied about Iraq WMD. Where are you Scott Shane????

Link to the translated document on FR: 2001 Iraqi Document: Saddam Approved the Re-Use of Nuclear Equipment http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1725141/posts

Moreover, there are documents dated 1999-2001 that talk about Saddam regime projects to re-build some of the nuclear program facilities like RWTS (Radioactive Waste Treatment Station) and Radio-Chemistry laboratories which were part of Iraq previous clandestine nuclear program. Link to the translated document on FR: Iraqi Documents: Projects to Rebuild Saddam Nuclear Facilities http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1718125/posts .

Also this one

Iraqi Documents Show Plans for Prohibited Nuclear Projects http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1709390/posts


TOPICS: Breaking News; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 19992001; 2001documents; atomicbomb; degussa; degussafurnaces; enemedia; fmsodocuments; gwbvindicated; iraq; jveritas; mediabbias; newyorktimessucks; notbreakingnews; nuclear; nuclearbomb; nuketheleft; nyt; onfreep; pajamahuddein; pajamapeoplerule; prewardocs; saddam; saddamdocs; saddamnuke; saddamnukes; waronerror; wmd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280 ... 501-512 next last
To: Shelayne

HERE IS A FIND!!!:

April 13, 2006 Salon
BUSH'S BOGUS DOCUMENT DUMP

While the world has watched claim after claim about Iraqi weapons of mass destruction dissolve like a mirage, the Bush administration has never deviated from one assertion in its shifting case for war: that there was an
operational connection between Saddam Hussein and al-Qaida.

As evidence of the manipulation of prewar intelligence keeps surfacing, the administration has now taken that equally dubious claim and made it virtual.

Lacking evidence of a real-world link between Saddam and the perpetrators of 9/11, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, headed by Bush appointee John Negroponte, has apparently decided to create one in cyberspace -- by seeding its new online Operation Iraqi Freedom Documents archive with suggestive jihadist materials, and by linking the site to an entirely unrelated database of al-Qaida materials.


OOPSY!!!
Now the New York Times has VALIDATED the Documents, and In doind so, VALIDATED Bush's reason for going to Iraq in the first place!!
http://www.salon.com/opinion/feature/2006/04/13/document_dump/index_np.html


241 posted on 11/02/2006 10:46:20 PM PST by tcrlaf (VOTE DEM! You'll Look GREAT In A Burqa!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 236 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1731259/posts?page=56#56

To: jveritas
Let's fix this one url so it clicks right:


"Link to the translated document on FR: 2001 Iraqi Document: Saddam Approved the Re-Use of Nuclear Equipment http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1725141/posts "


56 posted on 11/02/2006 9:07:15 PM PST by Cindy


242 posted on 11/02/2006 10:46:57 PM PST by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 231 | View Replies]

To: goodnesswins

If you copy and past the TEXT of the link in a page it works fine, that is what the link should have been pointing to, the Hyperlink is broken, Admin should be able to edit that so the links point to the intended pages.


243 posted on 11/02/2006 10:47:35 PM PST by Danae (Anál nathrach, orth' bháis's bethad, do chél dénmha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 240 | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf

Here is another leftist telling us that it's all a lie....

Right Blogosphere Scammed by Bogus Document Dump
by maha (DailyKos)
Fri Mar 17, 2006 at 10:45:52 AM PST
Looks like the Bushies are bypassing media and feeding misinformation directly to rightie bloggers.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2006/3/17/134552/862


244 posted on 11/02/2006 10:51:06 PM PST by tcrlaf (VOTE DEM! You'll Look GREAT In A Burqa!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 241 | View Replies]

To: Brad from Tennessee

Maybe Fitzgerald is like O'Reilly, turns himself into a pretzel to appear non-partisan. But I think that it is more likely that Fitzgerald is more interested in making a name for himself than he is upholding the law and fighting crime.


245 posted on 11/02/2006 10:51:20 PM PST by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 239 | View Replies]

To: Cindy

Thanks for fixing the links.

You might want to ask the mods to substitute clickable links in the original article.


246 posted on 11/02/2006 10:52:25 PM PST by EternalHope (Boycott everything French forever. Including their vassal nations.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 242 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

BLOGGED and credited!

http://thequestionfairy.blogspot.com/2006/11/new-york-times-confirms-documents.html

Excellent - the saturation blogging has begun...


247 posted on 11/02/2006 10:54:15 PM PST by dandelion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 229 | View Replies]

To: Cindy

Thank you Cindy :)


248 posted on 11/02/2006 10:54:20 PM PST by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 242 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

You're always welcome.


249 posted on 11/02/2006 10:55:42 PM PST by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 248 | View Replies]

To: jveritas; tgslTakoma; torchthemummy; tcrlaf
"But in recent weeks, the site has posted some documents that weapons experts say are a danger themselves: detailed accounts of Iraq’s secret nuclear research before the 1991 Persian Gulf war. The documents, the experts say, constitute a basic guide to building an atom bomb."

"But President Bush approved the site’s creation after Congressional Republicans proposed legislation to force the documents’ release."

They're celebrating over at the DUmp... saying that "this stuff was from before the FIRST Iraq War". They're expecting Bush to look bad over this, because he "authorized nuclear secrets being posted on the web." They're discussing how this will seal the election for them. Geesh...

250 posted on 11/02/2006 10:56:26 PM PST by nutmeg (National security trumps everything else.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EternalHope

Ok, I don't think mods can edit the posts, just the titles, but I'll check.


251 posted on 11/02/2006 10:56:53 PM PST by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 246 | View Replies]

To: nutmeg

They were celebrating Jf'nK shooting his mouth of on Tues.


252 posted on 11/02/2006 10:58:24 PM PST by REDWOOD99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 250 | View Replies]

To: nutmeg

Let them Celebrate, just as they did over the Kerry "Smackdown" of Bush...

The Realization of it all will begin to slowly dawn on them early on Friday Afternoon....


253 posted on 11/02/2006 10:59:10 PM PST by tcrlaf (VOTE DEM! You'll Look GREAT In A Burqa!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 250 | View Replies]

To: Danae
You are right, it is not working in the original article, I may have done something wrong in linking it.
254 posted on 11/02/2006 10:59:11 PM PST by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 232 | View Replies]

To: Semi Civil Servant

Not to worry.
EIB is SO on it!


255 posted on 11/02/2006 10:59:32 PM PST by ValentinesDay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies]

To: nutmeg

Let them delude themselves as they usually do...


256 posted on 11/02/2006 11:01:24 PM PST by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 250 | View Replies]

To: All
Signing off, will be back in the morning to enjoy the
257 posted on 11/02/2006 11:01:48 PM PST by pbear8 (All the Saddam documents are real, the NYT finally figured it out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 255 | View Replies]

To: jveritas
I hope that the President will address this head on. The truth is on his and our side.

Well, while he's addressing this head on, I hope he invites you to the ceremony.

Just trying to figure out when would be the best time - Before or After the address to present to you the Medal of Freedom.


258 posted on 11/02/2006 11:01:51 PM PST by Diver Dave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies]

To: Diver Dave

LOL! I was thinking the same thing 30 minutes ago!

"Awarded for Defending America from it's terrorist enemies, both inside and outside of the Democratic Party"


259 posted on 11/02/2006 11:04:16 PM PST by tcrlaf (VOTE DEM! You'll Look GREAT In A Burqa!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 258 | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf; jveritas; REDWOOD99
The Realization of it all will begin to slowly dawn on them early on Friday Afternoon....

Just as they're rolling out of bed... ;-)

260 posted on 11/02/2006 11:06:00 PM PST by nutmeg (National security trumps everything else.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 253 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280 ... 501-512 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson