Skip to comments.
Episcopal Leader Denies Bible Condemns Gays
The Indy Channel ^
| November 2, 2006
| AP
Posted on 11/02/2006 1:50:05 PM PST by Abathar
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-63 next last
To: Abathar
Dyslexia is a big problem in the Episcopal clergy, is it?
41
posted on
11/02/2006 4:39:52 PM PST
by
RichInOC
("I see stupid people. They're everywhere....They don't even know that they're dumb.")
To: Abathar
No bible that I have seen or read approves of homosexual activity. Everywhere it is mentioned it is identified with an a abomination in the eyes of the LORD. Amen. She must have a homosexual version of a book, certainly not a Bible. Amen.
42
posted on
11/02/2006 4:41:25 PM PST
by
gakrak
("A wise man's heart is his right hand, But a fool's heart is at his left" Eccl 10:2)
To: CA Conservative
remember that Paul refers to deaconessesYou might want to say *where* he refers to them.
43
posted on
11/02/2006 4:42:52 PM PST
by
AppyPappy
(If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
To: RinaseaofDs
The result of modern Biblical scholarship, which denies the authority of the very Scriptures they study.
44
posted on
11/02/2006 4:46:19 PM PST
by
RobbyS
( CHIRHO)
To: AppyPappy
Romans 16:1:
"I commend to you our sister Phoebe, a deaconess of the church at Cen'chre-ae,"
RSV
To: BelegStrongbow
Though I'd much rather these kinds of pings got called what they are: Episcopalian pings. The ping list is named for the intended audience. Believe me, if there were more news from within the Continuum, I'd be posting it.
46
posted on
11/02/2006 5:03:29 PM PST
by
sionnsar
(†trad-anglican.faithweb.com†|Iran Azadi| 5yst3m 0wn3d - it's N0t Y0ur5 (SONY) | UN: Useless Nations)
To: ahadams2; cf_river_rat; fgoodwin; secret garden; MountainMenace; SICSEMPERTYRANNUS; kaibabbob; ...
Thanks to
BelegStrongbow for the ping.
Traditional Anglican ping, continued in memory of its founder Arlin Adams.
FReepmail sionnsar if you want on or off this moderately high-volume ping list (typically 3-9 pings/day).
This list is pinged by sionnsar, Huber and newheart.
Resource for Traditional Anglicans: http://trad-anglican.faithweb.com
More Anglican articles here.
Humor: The Anglican Blue (by Huber)
Speak the truth in love. Eph 4:15
47
posted on
11/02/2006 5:04:10 PM PST
by
sionnsar
(†trad-anglican.faithweb.com†|Iran Azadi| 5yst3m 0wn3d - it's N0t Y0ur5 (SONY) | UN: Useless Nations)
To: ahadams2; cf_river_rat; fgoodwin; secret garden; MountainMenace; SICSEMPERTYRANNUS; kaibabbob; ...
Thanks to
BelegStrongbow for the ping.
Traditional Anglican ping, continued in memory of its founder Arlin Adams.
FReepmail sionnsar if you want on or off this moderately high-volume ping list (typically 3-9 pings/day).
This list is pinged by sionnsar, Huber and newheart.
Resource for Traditional Anglicans: http://trad-anglican.faithweb.com
More Anglican articles here.
Humor: The Anglican Blue (by Huber)
Speak the truth in love. Eph 4:15
48
posted on
11/02/2006 5:06:36 PM PST
by
sionnsar
(†trad-anglican.faithweb.com†|Iran Azadi| 5yst3m 0wn3d - it's N0t Y0ur5 (SONY) | UN: Useless Nations)
To: JimRed
"Men committed indecent acts with other men, and received in themselves the due penalty for their perversion."
AIDS?
Could be. But considering AIDS is killing far more heterosexuals than gays worldwide, one would have to conclude the judgment crosses boundaries.
Including the fact that millions of children have AIDS in Africa, and one of the lowest risk groups happens to be lesbians. Ironic isn't it.
49
posted on
11/02/2006 5:10:56 PM PST
by
Jorge
To: Abathar
Unfortunately for these Episcopal apostates, everywhere in the Bible homosexuality is mentioned it is condemned, and nowhere is it ever condoned.
50
posted on
11/02/2006 5:12:39 PM PST
by
Jorge
To: Abathar
You're right, it's a she.
51
posted on
11/02/2006 5:15:10 PM PST
by
Sam Cree
(Don't mix alcopops and ufo's)
To: Abathar
Sounds like these people never read the Book of Lot and what happened to Sodom and Gomorrah.
52
posted on
11/02/2006 5:20:10 PM PST
by
Defender2
(Defending Our Bill of Rights, Our Constitution, Our Country and Our Freedom!!!!)
To: Abathar
The Presiding Bishop-elect of the Episcopal Church said she ...That is as far as I had to read ...
53
posted on
11/02/2006 5:21:22 PM PST
by
af_vet_1981
(Waiting for Samson)
To: CA Conservative
The literal Greek is Diaconis which also means a worker or servant. A deaconess is the wife of a deacon (1 Tim 3)
54
posted on
11/02/2006 5:27:14 PM PST
by
AppyPappy
(If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
To: Defender2
Sounds like these people never read the Book of Lot and what happened to Sodom and Gomorrah. Don't you know?
God destroyed Sodom and Gomorrah for their "inhospitality" to strangers.
Believe it or not this is actually the "gay-Christian" theology on this topic.
55
posted on
11/02/2006 5:36:38 PM PST
by
Jorge
To: Jorge
#55. I think you had better read Genesis Chapters 18 & 19 all over again. Especially Genesis Chapter 19. Inhospitality was not the reason Sodom and Gomorrah was destroyed.
56
posted on
11/02/2006 6:22:48 PM PST
by
Defender2
(Defending Our Bill of Rights, Our Constitution, Our Country and Our Freedom!!!!)
To: Jorge
Start with Genesis Chapter 19 verse 4.
57
posted on
11/02/2006 6:25:18 PM PST
by
Defender2
(Defending Our Bill of Rights, Our Constitution, Our Country and Our Freedom!!!!)
To: Defender2
#55. I think you had better read Genesis Chapters 18 & 19 all over again. Especially Genesis Chapter 19. Inhospitality was not the reason Sodom and Gomorrah was destroyed. Uh, I think you better read my post over again.
All the way to the end this time.
I was mocking the "gay Christian" argument on this topic, NOT defending it.
58
posted on
11/02/2006 6:29:18 PM PST
by
Jorge
To: Jorge
Well, we both know, Sodom and Gommorrah was destroyed because it was EVIL. Not because of inhospitality.
And if Lot's wife had listened to him, and not looked back on Sodom and Gommorrah as she did, disobeying God's word, she would not have been turned into a pillar of salt.
59
posted on
11/02/2006 6:35:17 PM PST
by
Defender2
(Defending Our Bill of Rights, Our Constitution, Our Country and Our Freedom!!!!)
To: Defender2
Well, we both know, Sodom and Gommorrah was destroyed because it was EVIL. Not because of inhospitality. Anyone's who's debated "gay Christians" on this issue know how weak and lame their argument is.
Biblically there is no question as to the condemnation of homosexaulity in this passage.
60
posted on
11/02/2006 6:55:07 PM PST
by
Jorge
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-63 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson