1 posted on
10/20/2006 6:40:09 AM PDT by
presidio9
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 next last
To: Coleus; Salvation; wideawake; NYer; Aquinasfan; wagglebee
2 posted on
10/20/2006 6:40:55 AM PDT by
presidio9
(Make Mohammed's day: Shoot a nun in the back.)
To: presidio9
Wait til they have to pay for abortions!..........all Hell will break loose.........
3 posted on
10/20/2006 6:41:59 AM PDT by
Red Badger
(CONGRESS NEEDS TO BE DE-FOLEY-ATED...............................)
To: presidio9
Official state-sanctioned persecution of the Church by increments.
In our lifetimes we will see Catholic hospitals closed down by the government for refusing to facilitate euthanasia.
5 posted on
10/20/2006 6:43:46 AM PDT by
wideawake
("The nation which forgets its defenders will itself be forgotten." - Calvin Coolidge)
To: presidio9
The unintended conseqence should be that the church must then stop paying for all health insurance.
To: presidio9
Hahahaha, this will only last until the religion of peace SATANIC cult of Islam is forced to do thing by the courts. THEN all hell will break loose.
7 posted on
10/20/2006 6:43:52 AM PDT by
MadeInAmerica
(- If ILLEGAL means Undocumented - Then Breaking and Entering means Unannounced Visit)
To: presidio9
Where are the separation of church and state folks?
11 posted on
10/20/2006 6:48:33 AM PDT by
edcoil
(Reality doesn't say much - doesn't need too)
To: presidio9
This is wrong. Completely wrong.
12 posted on
10/20/2006 6:49:08 AM PDT by
trisham
(Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
To: presidio9
Evil. Pure evil from the court.
To: presidio9
"We must weigh against [their] interests in adhering to the tenets of their faith the state's substantial interest in fostering equality between the sexes, and in providing women with better health care." Religious freedom is specifically addressed in the Constitution while "fostering equality between the sexes, and in providing women with better health care" is not.
Appeal this all the way to SCOTUS.
20 posted on
10/20/2006 6:57:27 AM PDT by
Polybius
To: presidio9
Why can't Catholic Charities move out of liberal MA and NY to a State that would welcome them. Do not cast your peals before swine and all of that. Really vote with your feet and money.
24 posted on
10/20/2006 7:04:59 AM PDT by
therut
To: presidio9
Let's see......MUSLIM Taxi Drivers do NOT have to take people with seeing eye dogs or someone who has is carrying a bottle of wine, yet the CATHOLIC Church has to PAY for contraceptives which is against their teaching!!! STOP THIS MADNESS!!!!!!!!
To: presidio9
I'd love to type "unbeievable"...
27 posted on
10/20/2006 7:06:21 AM PDT by
Tulane
To: presidio9
Ridiculous.
Where is the right of "expression" any more in this country?
29 posted on
10/20/2006 7:07:51 AM PDT by
the OlLine Rebel
(Common sense is an uncommon virtue.)
To: presidio9
The courts basically think that the "free exercise" of religion means you get to think what you want in the privacy of your own home.
If you act on any of those beliefs, however, then you are subject to state control.
In other words, they stand the words of the Constitution on their head, and ignore the fact that "social service work", i.e. charity, is considered an essential part of the practice of the faith.
Catholic charities should move their bank accounts out of the state and ignore the ruling.
30 posted on
10/20/2006 7:08:06 AM PDT by
pierrem15
(Charles Martel: past and future of France)
To: presidio9; Lady In Blue; Salvation; narses; SMEDLEYBUTLER; redhead; Notwithstanding; ...
Catholic Ping List Please freepmail me if you want on/off this list
39 posted on
10/20/2006 7:16:32 AM PDT by
NYer
To: presidio9
I can never wrap my brain around how conticeptives and womens health care are one in the same
40 posted on
10/20/2006 7:17:17 AM PDT by
fml
To: presidio9
Notice how the AP does the propaganda spin, the exceprt paragraph would imply THIS IS IN YOU, YOUR STATE, WHERE YOU LIVE STATE. Despite the fact this appears to only be NY based on the NY Catholic reference.
Pure propaganda.
Of course folks with a FEDERAL majority we have a chance to introduce federal law to trump this state law. Democrats will make the opposit mandatory.
Thanks for the propaganda AP.
41 posted on
10/20/2006 7:18:34 AM PDT by
longtermmemmory
(VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
To: presidio9; 69ConvertibleFirebird; Alexander Rubin; An American In Dairyland; Antoninus; ...
42 posted on
10/20/2006 7:19:07 AM PDT by
wagglebee
("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
To: presidio9
The court said the fact that the organizations hire employees outside their faith is a critical factor and they deserve the rights sought under the law. "New" rights. And we all know "new" rights trump old rights. Thank God we have courts and judges that constantly create "new" rights for us. The old ones get sort of stale from time to time.
43 posted on
10/20/2006 7:19:10 AM PDT by
VeniVidiVici
(In God we trust. All others we monitor.)
To: presidio9
These judges really need to read our Constitution. They can not make laws telling "religion" what to do. It's all there in the First Ammendment!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson