Posted on 10/18/2006 10:25:32 AM PDT by rob777
Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich has quietly positioned himself for a comeback to head the Republican Party as early as 2008.
GOP sources said Mr. Gingrich does not plan to run for president, but intends to be available as the savior of conservatives dismayed by candidates who seek to move the party to the left in the aftermath of George W. Bush’s presidency. Over the last few months, Mr. Gingrich has become the favorite of conservatives and has outlined a new vision for the GOP that seeks for the party to return to the moral clarity of the late President Ronald Reagan.
“I believe that whatever the results of the November elections, Newt will become a major force in the GOP for 2008," a senior Republican Party strategist said.
Mr. Gingrich has already become the choice of conservatives and the Christian Right. He has won the Human Events presidential straw poll for September, topping the list for the second month in a row.
The achievement marked a major boost for Mr. Gingrich. For much of 2006, Mr. Gingrich trailed Rep. Tom Tancredo, Colorado Republican, in the poll, but last month Mr. Gingrich led the House member by 31 to 17 percent.
Among conservatives, Mr. Gingrich is more popular than senior allies of President Bush and members of his administration. In the Human Events poll, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice dropped to sixth place with 6.68 percent. Florida Gov. Jeb Bush, the president's younger brother, reached 3.37 percent in the presidential straw poll.
GOP sources said Mr. Gingrich decided to raise his profile in 2006, with the publication of a weekly newsletter and the gathering of a brain trust. Over the last few months, he has been campaigning for Republican candidates and commenting on both domestic and foreign issues.
On several issues, Mr. Gingrich has taken positions that differ with that of the administration. While Mr. Bush has urged diplomacy to deal with a nuclear North Korea, Mr. Gingrich has been calling for regime change that echoed the Reagan era and the president's efforts with then-British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher and the late Pope John Paul II to undermine the communist regimes in Eastern Europe.
"When you look at a country such as North Korea, you see tremendous poverty," Mr. Gingrich said in a radio interview last week. "You have to believe that there are thousands of people who might want to collaborate with the West. We're remarkably bureaucratic. Rather than work with the North Korean government, we ought to be cooperating with those willing to smuggle food into the country. We have to recognize what a bad dictatorship this is."
GOP sources said Mr. Gingrich will most likely not run for president in 2008. But they said he would seek to represent the conservative wing of the party, the endorsement of which would be regarded as crucial for any GOP nominee.
"It's obvious that in 2008, the party will move away from the Bush era and will be looking for a change in direction," another GOP source said. "I think Newt will be in a position to lay out a strategy that would appeal to both conservatives and old-line Republicans."
It appears that Newt is seeking to be a king maker, rather than a king. (The brains behind the throne?)
Any Republican who complained about Clinton's marital failures and thinks Newts are no big deal is a hypocrite.
Quietly? I don't think so...he has been on talks shows nearly every day and night since the 2004 elections. He senses that the conservatives are getting restless and will not vote for a non-conservative in 2008.
I don't see him as a major leader anymore. I like to see him occasionally on TV but too much of him and he comes across as a blow hard.
I have no problem with his efforts. In fact name another conservative that should/ can carry the mantle? Our bench is weak and our players are Rinos. For all his faults I cannot think of another man that understands the stakes at hand and would wake up everyday asking himself the same questions we ask ourselves daily.
Can anyone name a better alternative? Are their any head banging Conservatives out there?
After watching Rick Santorum clean Caseys' clock in 3 televised debates I know who I'll be supporting, The rest of them r weenies.
Go, Newt, Go!
Newt= Too many divorces. The US has never had a President who was married three times.
I'm not sold even though Newt is my former Congressman.
He's got that disloyalty character flaw that scares me to ever vote for him again.
Newt is damaged goods. If he ever decides to run again, the Dims will drag his resignation out of the closet and he'll be toast.
Clinton's marital failures - I thought he was still married.
The GOP leadership will just never get it.
Constitution Party, here I come!
Newt WAS a great LEADER, but he has ruined himself with his runaway zipper....it would be SUICIDE to have him as THE Kingmaker!!
So it's O.K. if we instead complained about Clinton's lying to a judge, a grand jury, suborning perjury, and etc. Or are you suggesting Newt did these things?
Hmmmm. I'm no fan of the Newtster's track record at home, and I don't think a divorcé is someone the GOP ought to run, but . . . how many gals did he rape?
Newt really has a rather large ego problem.
I generally think his ideas are good, but his ego is way out of control.
Let's face the real issue Kiddies:
Where are our "dazzeling" candidates?
OK... the Dems are full of stiffs,...but where are our charismatic leader types?
And don't tell me the woods are full of 'em.
"Any Republican who complained about Clinton's marital failures and thinks Newts are no big deal is a hypocrite."
Any Republican who denigrates Newt's contributions to the country due to his personal marital problems is much worse than a mere hypocrite. Such people are Democrats in Republican clothing.
I wouldn't put it past either one of them to play Perot in '08 in order to hand the election to the Clintons.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.