Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

North Korea wants to talk(says they tested NEUTRON BOMB)
Herald Sun ^ | 10/10/06 | Gerard McManus and agencies

Posted on 10/10/2006 3:37:05 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster

North Korea wants to talk

Gerard McManus and agencies

October 10, 2006 12:00am

A NORTH Korean official said Pyongyang is willing to return to international arms talks and abandon its atomic program if the US takes "corresponding measures," reports suggest.

"The nuclear test is an expression of our intention to face the United States across the negotiating table," the unnamed official said, according to South Korea's Yonhap news agency.

"What we want is security of the (North), including guaranteeing our system."

Yonhap didn't say how or where it contacted the official, or why no name was given.

The official didn't elaborate on what the corresponding measures would be.

But one of them is believed to be a long-standing North Korean demand that Washington lift financial restrictions on the communist regime for its alleged counterfeiting and money laundering.

North Korea has cited the financial issue in boycotting nuclear talks with China, Japan, South Korea, Russia and the US The talks last convened in November.

The official also dismissed moves at the UN Security Council to sanction the communist nation over its reported nuclear test.

"We have lost enough. Sanctions can never be a solution," the official said.

"We still have a willingness to give up nuclear weapons and return to six-party talks as well. It's possible whenever the US takes corresponding measures."

Pyongyang declared yesterday that it had successfully tested a nuclear bomb.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.com.au ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: korea; nkorea; northkorea; nucleartest
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-97 last
To: musicman

Utterly disgusting.


81 posted on 10/10/2006 3:32:39 PM PDT by GOP_1900AD (Stomping on "PC," destroying the Left, and smoking out faux "conservatives" - Take Back The GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: GOP_1900AD

It is not a question of trusting China and Russian. It is now a question of Chinas and Russias integrity with regards to what is happening in North Korea. We conservatives always assumed that they had no integrity with respect to North Korea. If their assessment of Kims Little Bang ends up being vastly different from the Free Worlds assessment, they make themselves and their statements concerning North Korea, inconsequential or irrelevant. We knew that, now the rest of the World will know that.


82 posted on 10/10/2006 5:05:21 PM PDT by justa-hairyape
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: GOP_1900AD; PghBaldy; TigerLikesRooster
Proof that the Ronery One lurks...

To: PghBaldy

Just out of curiosity, is it possible to fake an underground nuke test with conventional explosives? The ronery one knows we will not nuke him but it would be a heck of a lot cheaper to bluff a nuclear capacity than to build one.

4 posted on 08/26/2006 11:48:28 PM EDT by NonValueAdded (Tom Gallagher - the anti-Crist [FL Governor, 2006 primary])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]


Link: North Korea Going Underground?
83 posted on 10/10/2006 6:17:58 PM PDT by NonValueAdded (Treaty Fetishism: "[The] belief that a piece of paper will alter the behavior of thugs." R. Lowry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Just mythoughts
Bill Richardson is still claiming that we should have one on one, face to face talks with Il.

I agree !

Send Bill Richardson

Or Nancy Pelosi

Or George Soros
Or Barbra Streisand rr Natalie Maines on a one way no return flight

84 posted on 10/10/2006 6:23:55 PM PDT by af_vet_1981
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_1981
I think Hillry ought to lead your delegation, she was causing some sort of road block somewhere today and was praising her husbands handling of the mental Il. At the same time she was chavezing President Bush.
85 posted on 10/10/2006 6:29:53 PM PDT by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: agere_contra

That's my thinking too. Without sniffing the radiation evidence, Kim must be thinking he can use a large conventional blast dubbed "nuclear" as a bargaining chip to get the US to concede to negotiations and folk like Richardson are eating it up.

Without an explosion going "critical", all they can develop is the equivalent of a dirty bomb. A strong blast? Yes. Thermo-nuclear? Not today.

The fact they're so naive thinking the international community can't tell if it's nuclear or conventional is a sure sign of NK's isolation and ignorance of the matter.


86 posted on 10/10/2006 6:31:41 PM PDT by azhenfud (an enigma between two parentheses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Tijeras_Slim

I figure at some point Korea will clain it was actually a Nude Bomb they set off and not a Nuke Bomb.

At that point we will need to assign this case to agent 86.


87 posted on 10/11/2006 10:10:44 AM PDT by CougarGA7 (This tag line will be commercial free for the remainder of this thread.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: CougarGA7

It's a Hush-A-Bomb they got from Boris and Natasha.


88 posted on 10/11/2006 10:12:55 AM PDT by Tijeras_Slim (Dancing through life like a street mime with tourettes syndrome.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

 

89 posted on 10/11/2006 10:14:21 AM PDT by Incorrigible (If I lead, follow me; If I pause, push me; If I retreat, kill me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tijeras_Slim

Hey Kimmy! Watch me pull a nuke out of a hat!

Again?!

Nutin up my sleave..

90 posted on 10/11/2006 10:15:20 AM PDT by CougarGA7 (This tag line will be commercial free for the remainder of this thread.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: gogogodzilla; Petey139; SampleMan

Ping to a non-vanity thread...


91 posted on 10/14/2006 7:46:41 PM PDT by null and void ("It is better to look ahead and prepare than to look back and regret."--Jackie Joyner-Kersee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Yea right. The only thing they have tested is my patience


92 posted on 10/14/2006 7:48:18 PM PDT by bobdsmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AmericaUnited
What am I missing here?

A clue?

93 posted on 10/14/2006 7:49:35 PM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: dc-zoo

Well said.


94 posted on 10/14/2006 7:49:53 PM PDT by NordP (America: There are more Patriots than Punks!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
A source close to the regime said North Korea had exploded a neutron bomb to allay doubts about its strength and deter US threats of regime change.


95 posted on 10/14/2006 7:53:09 PM PDT by SlowBoat407 (A living insult to islam since 1959)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Just mythoughts

Governor Bill Richardson (D-NM), energy secretary under Clinton, claims that we should hold face-to-face one-on-one talks with genocidal terrorist totalitarian dictator Kim Jong-il (D-NK). I concur, provided that we get to choose the venue: Camp X-ray at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. "Little dictator" Kim Jong-il fears airplane flight, so we'll transport him via US Navy vessels to that destination. If he prefers, we could hold the talks en route aboard an aircraft carrier. The totalitarian terrorist should take his entire palace corps, hundred most loyal supporters, and senior military generals to the talks.


96 posted on 10/14/2006 8:04:54 PM PDT by dufekin (The New York Times: an enemy espionage agency with a newsletter of enemy propaganda)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: r9etb

This wound up being exactly what I thought, a big ZERO.


97 posted on 10/15/2006 4:12:43 AM PDT by AmericaUnited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-97 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson