Thank you GarryOwen2006 for that update.
OH Wow rack it Garry
Well, well, well. This is interesting.
And the phony dance continues, to the strains of a Cantonese tune. And China once again looks like the reasoned party, the straight man to Kim Jong-Il's fanatic. And we all play along. What a farce.
Sounds like the little Korean Pot-bellied pig might have screwed the pooch.
hmmm wonder if it was still a fake nuke... lol
Why?
Are the sanctions going to have teeth? be watered down? have the Chinese finally believed he's uncontrollable even by them?
Since China is involved, I'll wait and see for the answers.
And there it is.
I think he'll try again. He doesn't have a lot of choice at this point.
We may not have that much leverage over Kim Jong Il, but we do have an enormous balance of trade deficit with the Chinese that we could start "reducing" if the ChiComs won't play ball. Sounds like they may have already figured that out.
With conditions on the conditions...
A: Marxism and Islamofascism.
Q: Name two political movements that were destroyed in January 2007.
Good if true, but I'll believe it when I see it. There are certain mutual affinities between the despots even when they speak different languages.
Oh, my...China basically telling Mini-Me he's on his own!
yeah, the last thing China needs is a credible threat to its status as 900 pound gorilla.
yeah, the last thing China needs is a credible threat to its status as 900 pound gorilla.
What's really going on here, though? Kim Jong-Ill (mispelled on purpose) has (a) embarassed China and (b) done something that is making Japan about seriously considering getting/making nukes. China will not abide either. But they aren't about to fight Japan again -- they've lost every time they've tried. A nice, peaceful, consumption-based Japan is what they want.
If Ill doesn't back down -- and NOW -- his days are numbered. Ironically, it won't be the US that takes him down, it will be China. Strange bedfellows indeed...
I don't post often but here's another viewpoint: China's support for sanctions sounds encouraging. My problem is that I have a hard time trusting breaking media reports and a harder time trusting China or N. Korea.
We don't know what behind the scenes discussions may have occurred between China and NK. China may have told NK they must support sanctions (because of the Olympics, etc.) but that China would veto any meaningful ones.
Another possibility (a hunch) is that China is leery of NK's growing friendship with Iran, and wants to take Kim Mentally-il down a peg. Bottom line: We just don't know what China intends, but it 'sounds' good.