Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

North Korea Reported to Have Tested Nuclear Weapons (U.S. Official Confirms N. Korean Nuclear Test)

Posted on 10/08/2006 7:43:33 PM PDT by Ragnar Danneskjold

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 541-560561-580581-600601-618 next last
To: Bahbah

That was my thought as well. If they didn't want this to happen they clearly overestimated their influence over this nut.


561 posted on 10/09/2006 3:47:57 AM PDT by mainepatsfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 560 | View Replies]

To: Ragnar Danneskjold
Goody, now the MSM may put the "Foley Scandal" on page A2. sarc
562 posted on 10/09/2006 3:52:30 AM PDT by tobyhill (The War on Terrorism is not for the weak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bahbah

You know I knew Karl would be working hard to get Foley off the front page, but this is a bit over the top even for him. s/


563 posted on 10/09/2006 4:08:26 AM PDT by defconw (Gearing up for W2 in 08!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 560 | View Replies]

To: defconw
I knew Karl would be working hard to get Foley off the front page

Really, at this point anything he can do is welcome. A great nation spent over a week obsessing about dirty talk on the internet. I could not believe it.

564 posted on 10/09/2006 4:18:54 AM PDT by Bahbah (Shalit, Goldwasser and Regev, we are praying for you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 563 | View Replies]

To: Ragnar Danneskjold

October Surprise Dimocraps!!!!


565 posted on 10/09/2006 4:22:21 AM PDT by Maelstorm (The one thing that is certain about politics is that nothing is certain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bahbah
Well it is the silly season and as can be attested to here on this forum, we are all a little tense.

Here's a funny line from Wonkette.

"We just want to be the first to say George W. Bush doesn’t care about Kim Jong Il. Thank you."

WTG Karl! ;)

566 posted on 10/09/2006 4:22:27 AM PDT by defconw (Gearing up for W2 in 08!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 564 | View Replies]

To: Ragnar Danneskjold

Just saw the following on Seoul's craigslist:

For Sale: Nuclear device ideal for the terrorist looking to obliterate a US city. Asking $5,000,000 but price is negotiable. Please, only serious terrorist offers only. Would make a nice Christmas gift.


567 posted on 10/09/2006 4:25:45 AM PDT by 1curiousmind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ragnar Danneskjold

Gretchen Blond-ditz on Fox & Friends keeps trying to say NK set off a missile.

Roger really needs to review the blond news-readers. Some of them can't even read news off the teleprompter.


568 posted on 10/09/2006 4:32:22 AM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE
This was the reason for the look of worry on W's

You may be right. It looked like he was distracted by something ...

569 posted on 10/09/2006 4:39:43 AM PDT by silent_jonny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 312 | View Replies]

To: DB
Had there been any substantial nuclear detonation, we - and everyone else - would know before they reported it. Just like the Indian and Pakistani detonations, detectors went off all over the world.

Good point.

570 posted on 10/09/2006 4:43:31 AM PDT by silent_jonny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 335 | View Replies]

To: Ragnar Danneskjold

According the the USGS seismic readings, the NK blast was equivalent to 550 tons of TNT. For comparison, the Nagasaki blast was a 20-kiloton yield.

If you really think about it, NK could have just trucked 550 tons of conventional TNT into that abandoned coal mine and set it off. Who'd know the difference? The world would see them as joining the Nuke Club and nobody'd be the wiser.


571 posted on 10/09/2006 4:44:06 AM PDT by BuffaloJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: silent_jonny
Well they're saying it was a major detonation now.

I don't know why it took so long for the seismic data to get out.
572 posted on 10/09/2006 4:52:03 AM PDT by DB (©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 570 | View Replies]

To: BuffaloJack
They've revised that.

Now they're saying 5kT to 15kT. Much, much larger.
573 posted on 10/09/2006 4:53:25 AM PDT by DB (©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 571 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar

Get US soldiers out of SK. Lets help Japan fully rearm and let Beijing and SK take care of this. The SK hate the US anyhow.Any nuke used on Japan or the US will be met with total annihilation of Nk and her allies.


574 posted on 10/09/2006 5:39:20 AM PDT by MARKUSPRIME
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: furquhart

"Hit them now!"

As much as I think Howard Dean is a maniac, his mantra last week will resonate with voters:
5 years after Bush took office, NK has nukes
5 years after, Iran is getting nukes,
5 years later, no bin Laden.

Bush needs to do something to address this. And it might be wise to do it in the next three weeks. Clinton paused before the election, thinking people would claim any action taken against UBL would be seen as political maneuvering. Bush has nothing to lose.


575 posted on 10/09/2006 6:13:01 AM PDT by Tulsa Ramjet ("If not now, when?" "Because it's judgment that defeats us.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: BuffaloJack; All

Thread on Russia's estimate (which is much larger):

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1716147/posts


576 posted on 10/09/2006 6:17:15 AM PDT by NinoFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 571 | View Replies]

To: DB

I don't understand these graphs, but that has been bugging me all night.


Last night the test wasn't showing up on the EQ graphs. The media were reporting it wasn't showing up. How does that work? I am not trying to debunk, I don't know enough about this to know that I don't know. LOL Just curious!


577 posted on 10/09/2006 6:19:04 AM PDT by blastbaby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 573 | View Replies]

To: Tulsa Ramjet

5 years later and the Dems still provide no alternative.


578 posted on 10/09/2006 6:20:43 AM PDT by ShandaLear (So there!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 575 | View Replies]

To: ShandaLear

5 years later the Clinton Legacy comes home to roost. Give me a break with these DU talking points.


579 posted on 10/09/2006 6:22:44 AM PDT by angcat ("IF YOU DON'T STAND BEHIND OUR TROOPS, PLEASE FEEL FREE TO STAND IN FRONT OF THEM")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 578 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie
How does this effect us? They're for sale to anyone who wants to use them against us.

What ... you're against the free market? /s

580 posted on 10/09/2006 6:22:48 AM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 431 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 541-560561-580581-600601-618 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson