Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ragnar Danneskjold

According the the USGS seismic readings, the NK blast was equivalent to 550 tons of TNT. For comparison, the Nagasaki blast was a 20-kiloton yield.

If you really think about it, NK could have just trucked 550 tons of conventional TNT into that abandoned coal mine and set it off. Who'd know the difference? The world would see them as joining the Nuke Club and nobody'd be the wiser.


571 posted on 10/09/2006 4:44:06 AM PDT by BuffaloJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: BuffaloJack
They've revised that.

Now they're saying 5kT to 15kT. Much, much larger.
573 posted on 10/09/2006 4:53:25 AM PDT by DB (©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 571 | View Replies ]

To: BuffaloJack; All

Thread on Russia's estimate (which is much larger):

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1716147/posts


576 posted on 10/09/2006 6:17:15 AM PDT by NinoFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 571 | View Replies ]

To: BuffaloJack
If you really think about it, NK could have just trucked 550 tons of conventional TNT into that abandoned coal mine and set it off. Who'd know the difference?

We would! We knew the minute it was detonated. Nukes have a particular seismic signature, and we have that.

They simply have not yet released what we know, and they may not. We can play this in many different ways.

590 posted on 10/09/2006 6:58:59 AM PDT by Cold Heat (I just analyze it, I did not create the mess...so go pound sand:-))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 571 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson