Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CLAIM: FILTHY FOLEY ONLINE MESSAGES WERE PAGE PRANK GONE AWRY
Drudge Report ^ | 10/5/07 | Drudge

Posted on 10/05/2006 11:50:13 AM PDT by kcvl

Edited on 10/05/2006 1:00:50 PM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]

>XXXXX DRUDGE REPORT XXXXX THU OCT 5 2006 2:53:48 ET XXXXX

CLAIM: FILTHY FOLEY ONLINE MESSAGES WERE PAGE PRANK GONE AWRY
**World Exclusive**
**Must Credit the DRUDGE REPORT**

According to two people close to former congressional page Jordan Edmund, the now famous lurid AOL Instant Message exchanges that led to the resignation of Mark Foley were part of an online prank that by mistake got into the hands of enemy political operatives, the DRUDGE REPORT can reveal.

According to one Oklahoma source who knows the former page very well, Edmund, a conservative Republican, goaded an unwitting Foley to type embarrassing comments that were then shared with a small group of young Hill politicos. The prank went awry when the saved IM sessions got into the hands of political operatives favorable to Democrats.

The primary source, an ally of Edmund, adamantly proclaims that the former page is not a homosexual. The prank scenario was confirmed by a second associate of Edmund. Both are fearful that their political careers will be affected if they are publicly brought into the matter.

The prank scenario only applies to the Edmund IM sessions and does not necessarily apply to any other exchanges between the former congressman and others.

The news come on the heels that Edmund has hired former Timothy McVeigh attorney, Stephen Jones.

Developing...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: brianrossmustresign; cornholegate; demoratstrashamerica; dirtydemorats; divideandconquer; foley; foleygate; hgtvchat; jordanedmund; jumpedthesnark; magnificentbastard; omg; pagingdanrather; pelosi; pelosiugly; rove; rovestrikesagain; ruhrohraggy; rymb; stephenjones; uhoh
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,641-1,6601,661-1,6801,681-1,700 ... 3,161 next last
To: kalee
They are reassuring each other that the nasty Republicans are going down (so to speak) and posting "evidence" such as:
Dems Can't TOP this LIST! (list of every Republican sex scandal they can think of for the past 25 years)

1,661 posted on 10/05/2006 2:13:01 PM PDT by steve-b (It's hard to be religious when certain people don't get struck by lightning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 273 | View Replies]

To: Txsleuth

Good for Neil - how did Soros respond to that question ? Did he actually answer it or dance around it ?


1,662 posted on 10/05/2006 2:13:02 PM PDT by cinives (On some planets what I do is considered normal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1494 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave
Great idea, Grandpa Dave!

We all know who they are and they need to now be stopped from disrupting FR.

1,663 posted on 10/05/2006 2:13:10 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: madison10

I'm sure "a little compassion" is exactly what you were showing when Clinton was getting milked by Monica.


1,664 posted on 10/05/2006 2:13:44 PM PDT by letsgonova19087
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1646 | View Replies]

To: Txsleuth
Your on the same wave length I am.

The authorities do not ask anyone to sign an affidavit or testify under oath over something minor. She's in it up to her neck and they obviously have something on her to even approach her with those requests, and is it just a coincidence that soros made his first guest appearance on TV today and on FOX at that.
1,665 posted on 10/05/2006 2:13:45 PM PDT by AmeriBrit (By a miracle we lived through 'Eight Clinton Years of Living Hell'....NO MORE CLINTON'S...EVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1509 | View Replies]

To: lone star annie
I used to have old men hit on me all the time and I would just blow them off.

You might want to rephrase that.

1,666 posted on 10/05/2006 2:13:47 PM PDT by Cementjungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1640 | View Replies]

To: JCEccles

I too have a 17 year old son and if some 50 year old man was getting off, literally, while talking to my son, I'd call that creepy anyway you slice it.


1,667 posted on 10/05/2006 2:13:50 PM PDT by countreegurl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1647 | View Replies]

To: MaestroLC

What a joke!! It seems the party that opposes tapping terrorists want them to tap a gay guy tho!!

Pathetic.

And Gibson still asking if Hastert should resign???????

Is this hardball or CNN???


1,668 posted on 10/05/2006 2:13:59 PM PDT by jackv (just shakin' my head)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1641 | View Replies]

To: JFC

Why did the kid wait until he was outed to get his 'friends' to back up his story it was a prank? This has been going on since Friday and it would have continued if he wasn't outed.


1,669 posted on 10/05/2006 2:14:12 PM PDT by PhiKapMom ( Go Sooners! George Allen for President in 2008!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1410 | View Replies]

To: dcgard

"Not sure what this "prank" aspect really accomplishes. Someone explain."

The "prank" claim was introduced to the discussion by that high-powered defense attorney hired by Jordan Edmund. I assume it's intended to show that Edmund wasn't blackmailing Foley, and wasn't gay.


1,670 posted on 10/05/2006 2:14:29 PM PDT by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1645 | View Replies]

To: petercooper

I didn't hit abuse, don't have to.

Moderators are quick about that. I just did not want to loose the content of your post before it was pulled.

I appreciated knowing the DUmies are melting down, thanks.


1,671 posted on 10/05/2006 2:14:52 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1614 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom

Because I think the "kid" secretly has some major left-wing connections.


1,672 posted on 10/05/2006 2:15:00 PM PDT by NinoFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1669 | View Replies]

To: JCEccles
As I said, I have 17 year old son and have raised two more beyond that age. When they were 16, they were no longer kids. They were tough, strapping young men. By the time they were 17 they were adults in every physical sense of the word.

The Dems have pitched this as an assault against prepubescent boys. I'm getting sick of reading the posts of FReepers who have bought into that lie.
Thank you. My sentiments exactly. There are unfortunately a lot of people in the Republican/conservative camp who are totally buying into this "pedophilia" / "child molester" Democratic propaganda (like Mona Charen's recent column. She sounds just like Nancy Pelosi - very odd.)

I smell Kool-Aid...

1,673 posted on 10/05/2006 2:15:20 PM PDT by valkyrieanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1647 | View Replies]

To: countreegurl
Yes, it's creepy. It's worse than creepy. It's wrong.

But it is not pedophilia. That's a whole different magnitude of wrong.

1,674 posted on 10/05/2006 2:15:25 PM PDT by JCEccles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1667 | View Replies]

To: letsgonova19087

What's the age difference between Demi and her boy toy? How about 'The Donald", or Cruse and Kattie and countless others. Are they all "pervs and peds"?

Get a grip.


1,675 posted on 10/05/2006 2:15:35 PM PDT by Hazcat (Live to party, work to afford it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1631 | View Replies]

To: Shethink13
Don't know if this has been posted again but it bears repeating because it explains why Foley won't be exonerated.

I'm not sure, but my guess would be that the "prank" was played on Foley himself. He probably engaged in the IM's thinking they were legit and the pages were just yankin' his chain.

1,676 posted on 10/05/2006 2:16:15 PM PDT by Sally'sConcerns
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: Hazcat

btt


1,677 posted on 10/05/2006 2:16:32 PM PDT by Sacajaweau (God Bless Our Troops!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1675 | View Replies]

To: Txsleuth
IF there are any honest reporters left they'll be all over Pelosi and other 'Rats who may have been involved..... we want ANSWERS.... what did they know, when did they know it, and what did THEY do with any info..... etc.

"Nancy Pelosi sure is refusing a LOT and so far, getting away with it.. IF the story is true that Hastert backed off having Freeh do the investigation because SHE said NO.... And if she did say NO....why??? Why would she refuse to testify under oath or sign an affidavit?? I think any reporter worth his/her credentials BETTER get those answers.."
1,678 posted on 10/05/2006 2:16:37 PM PDT by Enchante (There are 3 kinds of lies: Lies, Damned Lies, and the Drive-By Media)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1509 | View Replies]

To: top 2 toe red

Anarchists take note, if Ross walks on this, there is no accountability for election tampering by fraud.


1,679 posted on 10/05/2006 2:17:07 PM PDT by TET1968 (SI MINOR PLUS EST ERGO NIHIL SUNT OMNIA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1604 | View Replies]

To: jackv
And Gibson still asking if Hastert should resign???????

Gibson can stick a fork in it.

1,680 posted on 10/05/2006 2:17:37 PM PDT by MaestroLC ("Let him who wants peace prepare for war."--Vegetius, A.D. Fourth Century)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1668 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,641-1,6601,661-1,6801,681-1,700 ... 3,161 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson