Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Foley Setup? - Part V - Uncovering the Conspiracy
Macsminds ^ | 10.04.06 | Macranger

Posted on 10/04/2006 4:57:03 AM PDT by Perdogg

I don’t think I’ve ever seen a political conspiracy unravel as fast as this one that involves former representative Mark Foley.

Let’s recap.

1. On September 29th Foley is approached by ABC NEWS about salitious Instant Messages with a former page and abruptly resigns. Four days later he turns himself into rehab.

2. Through investigation by several bloggers, including yours truly, it is discovered that during the last few years, liberal watchdog group CREW may have had specific knowlede of the IM’s existance, and of Foley’s activities, and might have possibly been in possession corospondence between Rep. Foley and former page(s). Additionally a known “Republican Gay Outer”, Mike Rogers of Blog Active was found to have materially participated in the IM messaging of Foley and admitted to have been on a “campaign” to out Foley since at least as far back as March 2005, and specifically attempted to threaten Foley in January 2006, thus may be guilty of using threat or intimidation to influence a US Congressman’s vote on US legislation.

Yesterday Gateway Pundit uncovered that Mike Rogers had an a “partner” (although not known to be an accomplice at this point) in John Aravios of America’s Blog in a campaign against Foley as well. Gateway Pundit notes that there is no evidence that Aravios actually had specific evidence, but then holding evidence, and having knowledge of someone holding it are still crimes.

World Net Daily picked up on the story here, and puts together nicely what appears at this point to have been an orchestrated effort on the part of several leftwing activists to “pull the trigger” on this story just prior to midterm elections.

Additionally, while Mr. Foley appears by his resigning to have admitted to participating in IMing and emailing former pages, it’s not clear if all the recorded IM’s are authentic. The FBI, which is looking into the matter, as I mentioned here, will use specific forensic analysist to determine if in fact the corospondence discovered so far is in fact valid. Already it has been discovered that several IM’s may have in fact been tampered with.

At this point it’s not know the full involvement of those - or of others yet to be discovered - is. However, I do know that the specific focus of the FBI at this point is to determine who knew about Foley’s activities, when they knew it and specifically who withheld evidence in what may be a Federal Crime. Yet like in many investigations, there is sometimes the uncovering of other crimes that takes place. It should be said at this point that the attempt to attempt to extort or influence, or threaten a US congressman, in order to infuence legislation, or an election is a Federal Crime, and if in fact principals were involved in such an orchestrated plan it will be discovered.

Again, I must point out that even as a constituant of former respresentitive Foley, I detest his actions, and do not condone and accept them in anyway. In fact I support his prosecution if applicable laws have been broken. But again, those who particpated before the fact in the “outing” of Foley, seem to have had at this point specific knowledge of his activities and if proven at the least are guilty of conspriracy to withhold evidence, and obstruction of justice.

We shall see as the day(s) progress.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: aids; demorats; disease; foley; homosexual; sodomite; sodomy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-179 next last

1 posted on 10/04/2006 4:57:04 AM PDT by Perdogg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher; shield

ping


2 posted on 10/04/2006 5:03:59 AM PDT by Perdogg (Democratic Party - The political wing of Al Qaeda)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

As far as I've heard... Foley did not have any physical contact. He is disgusting, no doubt, but didn't DO anything. Where's the crime?

The Republicans need to go on the offensive NOW....

Introduce an emergency PROTECT THE PAGES AND INTERNS ACT. Any Congressman who is sexually bothering (physically or through correspondence) ANY page or intern, regardless of age, will temporarily resign pending investigation.

If the investigation determines there was sexual misconduct, that Congressman will be out the door, without any of the wonderful Congressional perks.

Any personal correspondence of a personal nature between a Congressman and ANY page or intern will be done through the Congressional page office (i.e., copied) and/or their parents will be copied .

See how many DEMOCRATs will vote for passage.

The pages and interns aren't there to be hit on by our sleezy politicians. Many companies have policies like this, I don't see why we can't expect the same from our Congress.



3 posted on 10/04/2006 5:04:42 AM PDT by musikman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple

ping


4 posted on 10/04/2006 5:05:16 AM PDT by Molly Pitcher (We are Americans...the sons and daughters of liberty...*.from FReeper the Real fifi*))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

And the demonrats wonder why no one trusts them anymore.


5 posted on 10/04/2006 5:05:18 AM PDT by Dr Stormfist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

Did you see this?

http://buffalogeek.wnymedia.net/archives/822


6 posted on 10/04/2006 5:10:10 AM PDT by AliVeritas (The road to hell is paved with bishops - St. Athanasis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

If the IM's have been "tampered with" then that information needs to come out LOUD AND CLEAR to the American Public. That needs to become the "story".


7 posted on 10/04/2006 5:10:55 AM PDT by true_blue_texican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg
While I make lots of typographical, spelling, and editing errors, I still think this site would pack more punch if the guy would spell "salacious" and "correspondence" correctly.

Other than that, yep, there are some issues here. The Dims and their running dogs are really good at "impresisonistic" propaganda. They put out a huge, street-sweeper kind of accusation, and by the time the truth of the matter comes out, the "meme" has done its work and moved on.

For example, the Plame mess will confirm many in their thinking that Republicans are vengeful, mean-spirited, and sneaky for election cycles yet to come, EVEN though we now know that probably the sneakiest person involved was the Independent Prosecutor. If he were to be disbarred tomorrow for misconduct in this matter, the charge has already done its work.

Here where the distinction will be between criminal acts and merely morally and otherwise repellent behavior, there is no effective defense.

Dims don't care for truth, for children, or for anything other than power. Like the rulers in 1984 they talk about the good of the people but what they want is control for its own sake.

8 posted on 10/04/2006 5:14:02 AM PDT by Mad Dawg (Now we are all Massoud)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: musikman
As far as I've heard... Foley did not have any physical contact. He is disgusting, no doubt, but didn't DO anything. Where's the crime?

Yep. ain't sex without intercourse. I would post more, but I want to ask for the latest "measurements" from my neighbor's son.

9 posted on 10/04/2006 5:17:45 AM PDT by Jalapeno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: musikman

As far as I've heard... Foley did not have any physical contact. He is disgusting, no doubt, but didn't DO anything. Where's the crime?

The Republicans need to go on the offensive NOW....

Geez Louise, talk about shooting yourself in the foot! Republicans should repudiate this piece of crap, not defend him.


10 posted on 10/04/2006 5:17:54 AM PDT by whirleygirl (no longer Texasbound)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

By holding them, did they cause the statute of limitations for any potential crime to pass when the ims were sent? Often times the SOL for federal crimes is 5 years.

If so, this might explain why they were held back.


11 posted on 10/04/2006 5:18:32 AM PDT by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Tom Lifson has an article out this morning that got me thinking -

http://www.americanthinker.com/comments.php?comments_id=6269

Is this the ket? -

According to Lifson, Aravosis (one of the known liberals outing gay congress people) said he obtained the latest information about the five-term congressman from Foley’s former chief of staff, Kirk Fordham.

QUESTION - Did Fordham have acccess to Foley's IM account information, screen name and password? Very likely. Could he have passed this information onto Aravosis and Rogers? Very possible. Could some of the IMs been manufactured then by Rogers or Aravosis, those being reported by ABC? Probable.

We know someone logged onto Foley's IM account yesterday when he was in a treatment center for 20-30 seconds, according to Fox News. Could this have been Rogers or Aravosis? I am sure the feds will know shortly if they already do not.


12 posted on 10/04/2006 5:22:16 AM PDT by jrooney ( Hold your cards close.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Molly Pitcher; Dane; A Citizen Reporter

Ping! More info here.


13 posted on 10/04/2006 5:23:04 AM PDT by Miss Marple (Lord, please look over Mozart Lover's and Jemian's sons and keep them strong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

So this is the GOP strategy? Question the timing? Because---shock and amazement--political opponents may have held the info for max impact? First, what a shocker. Second, who cares? What's worse? What Foley did is worse.


14 posted on 10/04/2006 5:23:53 AM PDT by Huck (There is a $2.00 service charge for this tagline---do you still wish to proceed?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Huck

If I am right about my post #12, then the democrats are just as bad as Foley and will pay dearly at the polls.


15 posted on 10/04/2006 5:25:57 AM PDT by jrooney ( Hold your cards close.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: backhoe

http://gatewaypundit.blogspot.com/2006/10/foleygate-altered-images-whats-going.html

Check this out for me.


16 posted on 10/04/2006 5:28:02 AM PDT by AliVeritas (The road to hell is paved with bishops - St. Athanasis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple; All
"1. On September 29th Foley is approached by ABC NEWS about salitious Instant Messages with a former page and abruptly resigns. Four days later he turns himself into rehab."

This may be a small point, (but who knows in this nutty spin cycle) however I thought I heard Foley's lawyer say yesterday at the press conference that Foley checked into a rehab center on Sunday. If anyone sees a transcript of Foley's attorney's press from yesterday, please ping me to it.

17 posted on 10/04/2006 5:30:30 AM PDT by A Citizen Reporter ("And you got that little smirk on your face, and you think you're so clever!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

Macsmind has been the go to point for this story.
Great investigating. I have gone to the site numerous times during the day for updates.


18 posted on 10/04/2006 5:30:43 AM PDT by Republican Red ("There’s God, then there’s the president and then there’s my father.”- 6 yr old Jack Roberts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jrooney

If what? If Foley's not really a disgusting pervert? Well if he's not really a pervert, how come we're not hearing him decry the phony IMs? How come instead we're hearing him say he's an alcoholic who was diddled by a priest? I can't stand when things like this happen, because it makes both FR and Rush pretty much unbearable. People just can't deal with reality. I don't even get why it's a big story. Perv congressman? Ho hum.


19 posted on 10/04/2006 5:31:37 AM PDT by Huck (There is a $2.00 service charge for this tagline---do you still wish to proceed?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: A Citizen Reporter

That is my understanding, that is why someone logging onto his IM account yesterday is odd. See post #12.


20 posted on 10/04/2006 5:31:45 AM PDT by jrooney ( Hold your cards close.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-179 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson