Posted on 10/03/2006 2:05:29 PM PDT by areafiftyone
FOLEY BOMBSHELL COMING ... FORMER CONGRESSMAN'S ATTORNEY TO HOLD NEWS CONFERENCE IN WEST PALM BEACH, FLA.
What's really fun is watching the MSM liberal apologists spin lame excuses why it's different when it's a liberal - why it's NOT news -- when it's a liberal...
Sadly I agree with you again.
Wait a minute - agreeing with me isn't a sad thing, is it? Hahahaha! :-)
In this case it is, LOL.
:-(
they have a poor, almost non-existant day to day political operation. but in fairness, its hard to do against the weight of the entire media establishment.
There is one huge point you are missing like the number of Freepers who wanted Foley out vs. the number of Dems who didn't want Slick out.
Foley should be out and we should bring up every chance we get that Dems stick or stuck by Studds, Barney, Teddy, Slick etc.
The Republicans have the MSM against them, indeed.
I missed that part of the show .. but I did catch Ann Coulter
She made a pretty good point when talking about the dems going after Hassert
The Democrats don't want us wiretapping terrorists .. but think we should be going after and wiretapping a gay man who sent emails
Where was the bombshell???
If what we saw and heard here in S.Fla was a bombshell, LOL, please give me a break, still LOL!!!
You didn't hear? Foley's gay. That was the "bombshell". I would say getting molested by the clergy would be the bombshell but heck, by now who hasn't?
Now foley has a good case to sue the Catholic church so that he can pay for his attorney fees!!!
:-)
Why don't you stop makng stupid and useless assumptions. It's okay to disagree with me and think I'm wrong. I don't have a problem with that. But to say that I want Hastert to resign when I've neither suggested it or even desire it changes the debate and gives you a pretend moral high ground that doesn't exist.
No...he didn't see those IMs coming. sarc off/
And neither do I have any sympathy for pedophiles.
What I am saying is that I am reading alot of posts that say...
Yes, he should go BUT...
It's the BUT I'm commenting on.
Ok..thanks!
Democrats worship at the throne of the UN. In fact, I read recently that the UN Rights of the Child was making a reappearance in a Democrat's campaign platform.
Put another way, Democrats believe the age of sexual consent should be lowered (and so should the age of voting). In CA, girls below the age of consent can have abortions now without parental notification and/or consent.
CA Democrats made that possible.
But an age of consent male being contacted by an alleged predator? EEEUU, they claim.
I just took a gander at a few of my favorite websites. They accuse the Republicans of folding, while they, the authors themselves are folding and don't see it.
The more this is written about, IMHO, the more it bleeds. There are far more important issues going on, than this obvious Democrat Political stunt.
The phrase "I'm taking something from you for the Common Good" keeps reappearing in my backbrain. There's money been collected, facts, psuedo-facts, allegations, and held back for just such a time.
Guess what I'm saying is: What if Dems created another political scandal and nobody cared? Dems specialty is creating a stink and making sure it resonates. It's what they've been doing for 30+ years. The scandal doesn't have to be true, it doesn't have to be held up on substantial evidence, it doesn't even have to be real.
But it becomes an "event" as people lose focus on what's important, and pay attention to the girl-game tactics of the Democrats. This is grammar school tactics.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.