Posted on 10/03/2006 2:05:29 PM PDT by areafiftyone
FOLEY BOMBSHELL COMING ... FORMER CONGRESSMAN'S ATTORNEY TO HOLD NEWS CONFERENCE IN WEST PALM BEACH, FLA.
The Democrats, in my opinion, are just hoping the clock winds down before anything incriminating turns up. Especially the Clintons who have the most to gain by bringing down the GOP.
Where is Mr. Rove? When the heck is he going to release some sort of counter punch to send the Rats running?
It isn't outrage, it's simple disgust. And it isn't directed at you. It's directed at the hypocrites who are ignoring the facts, and focusing on the party affiliation. And today, I just don't have any sympathy for pedophiles.
I know I read a headline on a FR article a few weeks ago...that said something about how Rove had promised an "October surprise"...
Well, IF Mr. Rove does have a surprise...I would suggest he whip that surprise out SOON!!!
I wonder if this story will drag on as long as Abu Ghraib.
I agree, and the press is trying to stir this into a great defeat for pubbies in November; I for one am even more energized to vote and will carry that energy to every person I know to go vote R in November. Keeping the dem creeps out of office is very important; their high and mighty attitude right now is so filled with hypocracy it is laughable. The media, in usual fashion, is omitting every dem scandal ongoing (jefferson, others)...but the pendulum will swing back, just wait. CREW and ABC need to tell the FBI where they got those IMs from.....and eventually it will be brought right back to a democrat source, imho. I'm waiting patiently for that to occur. In the meantime, the Washington Times should be ashamed of themselves for calling on Hastert to resign over this, at least this early in the game. If it turns out Denny is lieing (which I doubt), then it will be time for him to leave. Let the investigation go forth, let the truth come out, and the pubbies will be on the winning side of this.
Personally I don't think it will drag on much past the weekend, but I'm in the minority on that one.
Exactly! Blame the Catholic Church that you are a sexual deviant. The truth is, if Foley had not SUPPOSEDLY been molested by clergy, he still would be a SEXUAL DEVIANT - GAY. Why do they do that? Now I feel nothing for him and I hope the GOP didn't tell him to do this. Blaming the Catholic Church for this, and you can go after the church on other things, will do him or other deviants any good because this is used, it's OLD.
The story will go away as soon as the source of the IMs is revealed because it will be a dem associated organization. Once that is public, the media/dems will drop the story like a hot potatoe.
bump with no comment.
I use the word "homosexualist." Like "feminist," it denotes an individual who, regardless of his personal sexual preference, is committed to a political agenda that advances homosexuality as a political cause.
Not all homosexuals are homosexualists.
Yep. I read the same thing.
The Rats are simply having too much fun. I love watching them run with their tails between their legs. I wonder what's up his sleeve.
Dan Quayle!! Is that really you?? ;^)
Yes, the best revenge is always success!
Do words equal rape? Is cyber "sex" actual sex"?
The Dems who love these alleged PRIVATE IM logs seem to hate the Patriot Act. Buuuttttttt, the Dems are ecstatic with joy over "tapping into" these private alleged IMS.
Yes, you're right.
And those of us who can see know that this isn't about Foley or even about the “children” the liberals suddenly start caring about. If they really cared about them they would've raised the alarm back in 2003 when they supposedly knew about the instant messages. And if they are going to accuse Hastert of conspiracy and lack of leadership, where was the Speaker of the House - Democrat Tip O'Neil - in1983 when Gerry Studds, a Democrat Congressman from Massachusetts, had sexual relations with a page? Why didn't Speaker O'Neil demonstrate leadership and asked Studds to resign?
In fact, doing my research, I found that the Democrats didn't do that, they just censured him, and Studds kept getting reelected with the blessings and support of the whole Democrat Party.
Why didn't the Democrat Party get rid of the page program at that time if they cared so much about the children, and why didn't the media create the same stink they are enjoying now? Studds wasn't just “accused” of inappropriate emails or IM's with pages, HE WAS FOUND HAVING SEX with a page.
But I digress, this isn't about any of the above, this is about taking control of the House and the Senate. This is about appointing more leftist judges to the Supreme Court. This is about ending the war in Iraq and appeasing terrorists. This is about impeaching GW. This is about -as Clinton and the Democrats have been doing lately- rewriting history and pointing fingers to Bush as the one who is to blame for 9-11.
The Republicans are always playing defense... how about going on offense for once?
I can't think of a half dozen issues the GOP got in front on and controlled the narrative in the last year.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.