Posted on 10/03/2006 2:05:29 PM PDT by areafiftyone
FOLEY BOMBSHELL COMING ... FORMER CONGRESSMAN'S ATTORNEY TO HOLD NEWS CONFERENCE IN WEST PALM BEACH, FLA.
There is a record and it is possible for a freeper to be "outed" as Buckhead was.
Here's part of what Mike Rogers wrote about outing another Rep Senator:
http://web.archive.org/web/20061003202621/http://www.blogactive.com/2006/01/mister-senator.html
He narrows it down to 33 (he's doing the tease/ intimidation factor)
http://web.archive.org/web/20061003204037/http://www.blogactive.com/2006_04_01_blogactive_archive.html
Okay... I read your post again. I sense some outrage...sorry... but if you say you weren't, I'll believe ya...cause heck, I've got no reason not to.
DC law defines a child as being under 16 and then discusses sexual activity with children. I think that was his point.
No, what matters is the facts and not mis-contrued statements.
Ops4
Tha Page spoke out today, so ltes read it right.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1712301/posts
If you called Spencer on today's show, I heard your call. I was not at all satisfied with Spencer's response, which is often the case with him.
How that guy ever made it to being a host of a national radio show is beyond me. He flies off the handle way too easily sometimes and shouts down anyone who disagrees with him on something he feels strongly about.
I 100% agree with him on many issues, but mostly I find him to be a whiny, wimpy, wuss. It's fun to listen to him sometimes, but I rarely last the whole three hours.
If you really think conservatives/Republicans are responding to this the same way Democrats reacted to the Clinton/Lewinsky episode, just ask yourself if anyone with a (D) after their name would even dream of taking this kind of approach.
Good.
Beg pardon if the idea of having sex on-line seems ludicrous. Quite another thing to use it to lure them to an actual physical encounter. We have gotten so used to thinking of sixteen year olds as infants. At that age Alexander Hamilton and Johnj D. Rockefeller were successfully operating stores. Even we let them drive cars and hold now responsible jobs. Art least at that age, they are insurable workers. The guy is a POS, and the pages are naive boobs who think they are smart.
I was looking for the definition of "child" in some of those the other day. There didn't seem to be one. The definition of who is a minor may be state law. For instance, it is 16 in Washington, D.C. I still think he is in deep trouble for the communications he did have.
What you have posted may be Federal Law. Foley was working with Federal Laws for Internet Child Abuse and Porn, I believe. Don't know which laws he was breaking, if any, just because I'm not super knowledgable on this.
This comes down to illegal vs. legal, not right and wrong.
I would think internet access would not be that hard to come by, even in rehab.
Welcome!
Maybe this site?
It does get gross.
I agree, and here is the answer from a Page that was there, and is disputing the MSM reports.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1712301/posts
Right. And I suspect you wouldn't even dream of allowing your 16-year-old son to move to Washington and work in an environment where f#cked-up, deviant behavior among our elected "leaders" is pretty much considered normal.
Thats what I've been trying to figure out.
What I posted is indeed federal law and as I stated, it may not apply in this instance.
However, there it is.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.