Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Blog: The Sexually Explicit Internet Messages That Led to Fla. Rep. Foley's Resignation
http://blogs.abcnews.com/theblotter/2006/09/exclusive_the_s.html ^

Posted on 09/29/2006 3:20:49 PM PDT by lauriehelds

Maf54: You in your boxers, too? Teen: Nope, just got home. I had a college interview that went late. Maf54: Well, strip down and get relaxed.

Another message:

Maf54: What ya wearing? Teen: tshirt and shorts Maf54: Love to slip them off of you.

And this one:

Maf54: Do I make you a little horny? Teen: A little. Maf54: Cool.

The language gets much more graphic, too graphic to be broadcast, and at one point the congressman appears to be describing Internet sex.

Federal authorities say such messages could result in Foley's prosecution, under some of the same laws he helped to enact.

"Adds up to soliciting underage children for sex," said Brad Garrett, a former FBI agent and now an ABC News consultant. "And what it amounts to is serious both state and federal violations that could potentially get you a number of years."


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: electionscongress; florida; foley; homosexualagenda; markfoley; rinowatch; rmsp
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 261-272 next last
To: lauriehelds

Sicko, hope he goes to jail.


81 posted on 09/29/2006 3:43:02 PM PDT by ladyinred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

>>>>"There are scumbags in both parties, but there is a big difference. When we find a scumbag, we want him out of there and prosecuted"<<<<<

You said it Doug! Dittos

TT


82 posted on 09/29/2006 3:43:21 PM PDT by TexasTransplant (NEMO ME IMPUNE LACESSET)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: SittinYonder; Alter Kaker

Makes you wonder if there are any other Congressmen that the Capitol page program is "warning" people about.

Every other organization that deals with children has had to get religion on this issue. Our church sends everybody who comes into contact with children to training and has procedures in place to make sure children are never in alone with an single adult. If a complaint is made, or if there is so much as a rumor, there is a procedure in place to deal with it and safeguard the children. Safeguarding the children is the greatest priority.

Why does it not surprise me that Congress exempts themselves from such things?


83 posted on 09/29/2006 3:44:20 PM PDT by gridlock (The 'Pubbies will pick up at least TWO seats in the Senate and FOUR seats in the House in 2006)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: gridlock

From what I hear the page program is run real well nowadays. During the early 80's there was a huge ole scandal involving it and it was reformed. OF course that was coming up on 30 years ago


84 posted on 09/29/2006 3:46:04 PM PDT by catholicfreeper (Geaux Tigers SEC FOOTBALL ROCKS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: siwrcw03
This crap, and the Abrahamoff scandal makes me wonder what the hell the Republicans are doing in Washington!!!

Washington DC has become a club for people who think they're better than the rest of us. They get to break laws, line their own pockets, have special benefits (health insurance, retirement, protection from prosecution). It's all about them. The making laws and stuff like that, that's just so they've got something to do to justify us sending them back.

85 posted on 09/29/2006 3:48:59 PM PDT by SittinYonder (Ic þæt gehate, þæt ic heonon nelle fleon fotes trym, ac wille furðor gan,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: catholicfreeper

Well, that makes me feel better. Looks like this one fell through the cracks, though...


86 posted on 09/29/2006 3:49:07 PM PDT by gridlock (The 'Pubbies will pick up at least TWO seats in the Senate and FOUR seats in the House in 2006)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: lauriehelds

What is it that causes People to do this? Just SICK!


87 posted on 09/29/2006 3:52:10 PM PDT by US Navy guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lauriehelds

The age of consent in the District of Columbia is 16.

sources:
http://www.actwin.com/eatonohio/gay/consent.htm
http://www.coolnurse.com/consent.htm
http://www.avert.org/aofconsent.htm


88 posted on 09/29/2006 3:54:28 PM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lauriehelds

Way to paint a target on yourself, dumbbell.

Somebody ask the Dems if they think he'd make a good Scoutmaster.


89 posted on 09/29/2006 3:55:08 PM PDT by John Jorsett (scam never sleeps)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lauriehelds; All
Looong thread here (when the initial suspicions came up) - Sixteen-Year-Old Who Worked as Capitol Hill Page Concerned About E-mail Exchange with Congressman
90 posted on 09/29/2006 3:56:36 PM PDT by indcons (FReepmail "indcons" to get on/off the Military History ping list)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: laconic

Dont let anyone BS you. All homosexuals are Pedophiles. They all want young boys, Just because they settle for older guys doesnt not mean they wouldnt tap a youngster if given the chance.


91 posted on 09/29/2006 4:00:10 PM PDT by sgtbono2002 (The fourth estate is a fifth column.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Nita Nupress
This one just SCREAMS reaction formation.

Obviously a lot of the most vocally anti-gay people are completely gay themselves. Perhaps in many of these people, reaction formation is a correct explanation. In the case of politicians, though, as well as some others, the anti-gay posing is probably just cynical, calculated misdirection.

All of this probably applies even more to child molesters. The people who make the loudest claims to be trying to protect kids probably include many who want to get next to the kids.

92 posted on 09/29/2006 4:02:45 PM PDT by wideminded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Zeroisanumber
One more seat off of our side and onto the Dems. How many more do we have to give? Is anyone keeping count?

Faggoty Congressmen are ever on "our side"???

Doesn't sound like "we" lost anything.

93 posted on 09/29/2006 4:08:21 PM PDT by delacoert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: durasell
Made coffee come out of my nose...

Ooh! Is it good for you when I make it come out of your nose? Are you wearing clothes now?

94 posted on 09/29/2006 4:08:56 PM PDT by Right Wing Assault ("..this administration is planning a 'Right Wing Assault' on values and ideals.." - John Kerry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: lauriehelds

sick b*astard,hope he gets the book thrown at him!


95 posted on 09/29/2006 4:11:17 PM PDT by linn37 (Have you hugged your Phlebotomist today?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wideminded
"Obviously a lot of the most vocally anti-gay people are completely gay themselves."

I have seen examples of this in people I've been acquainted with. I occasionally spoke with a sheriff's deputy who was the biggest gay basher I'd seen when we were at the shooting range, to the point I thought he shouldn't have been a cop. I hadn't saw him in awhile last year, only to learn he was busted for drugs while he was getting it on with a male prostitute in a city an hour away from town lol.

96 posted on 09/29/2006 4:11:38 PM PDT by KoRn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: Rome2000
Image and video hosting by TinyPic
97 posted on 09/29/2006 4:13:19 PM PDT by Wormwood (Everybody lies, but it doesn't matter because nobody listens.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: KoRn

The mayor of Spokane too.

You can be anti-homosexuality and just leave it at that. Some of the people who rant and rave all day long about it though, not so much.

I am amazed at some of these folks who claim to investigate these very sick sex practices "for research" all the time to expose homosexuality. Something just ain't right there.


98 posted on 09/29/2006 4:14:18 PM PDT by dogbyte12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: All

Repulsive. Good-riddance.


99 posted on 09/29/2006 4:14:25 PM PDT by Mr. Buzzcut (metal god ... visit The Ponderosa .... www.vandelay.com ... DEATH BEFORE DHIMMITUDE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: All

But remember, everyone: we always have to vote for the lesser of two evils. Anybody with an 'R' next to his name deserves our support. So what if there's an occasional child molester in Congress -- it's worth keeping Nancy Pelosi out of the Speaker's chair.

< /sarcasm >


100 posted on 09/29/2006 4:15:03 PM PDT by Sloth ('It Takes A Village' is problematic when you're raising your child in Sodom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 261-272 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson