Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Administration Researches Laser Weapon (encouraging news)
New York Times ^ | May 3, 2006 | WILLIAM J. BROAD

Posted on 09/29/2006 12:03:09 PM PDT by Angel

The Bush administration is seeking to develop a powerful ground-based laser weapon that would use beams of concentrated light to destroy enemy satellites in orbit.

The largely secret project, parts of which have been made public through Air Force budget documents submitted to Congress in February, is part of a wide-ranging effort to develop space weapons, both defensive and offensive. No treaty or law forbids such work.

But some Congressional Democrats and other experts fault the research as potential fuel for an antisatellite arms race that could ultimately hurt this nation more than others because the United States relies so heavily on military satellites, which aid navigation, reconnaissance and attack warning.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Politics/Elections; Technical; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: china; defense; laser; russia; weapons
This is an old article, but with the discussion of China trying to hamper our satellites I thought it was encouraging news.

Of course the Democrats are against it.

1 posted on 09/29/2006 12:03:10 PM PDT by Angel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Angel
The gas dynamic laser system for the Airborne Laser System has been tested and is in final operational testing phase. It was reported several years ago that the Air Force was testing a tactical laser which would be mounted on F-16 fighter jets and would function very similar to the Tie Fighters of Star Wars fame.

Luke lower your visor!!!

2 posted on 09/29/2006 12:06:51 PM PDT by Young Werther (ues!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Angel
But some Congressional Democrats and other experts fault the research as potential fuel for an antisatellite arms race that could ultimately hurt this nation more than others because the United States relies so heavily on military satellites, which aid navigation, reconnaissance and attack warning.

Of course they do. More from the put-a-flower-in-the-rifle-muzzle crowd.

3 posted on 09/29/2006 12:06:53 PM PDT by CaptRon (Pedecaris alive or Raisuli dead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Angel
But some Congressional Democrats
But some Congressional Democrats
But some Congressional Democrats
But some Congressional Democrats
But some Congressional Democrats
But some Congressional Democrats
But some Congressional Democrats
AD NAUSEUM
4 posted on 09/29/2006 12:10:17 PM PDT by steel_resolve (Do you know what a bigot is? Someone winning an argument with a liberal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: steel_resolve

Don't Democrats rmind you of the Daleks.


5 posted on 09/29/2006 12:11:11 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Angel

The logic of the DemocRATS opposition is pure idiocy. They oppose it saying it would cause our enemies to more likely attack our satellites. Same logic they employ in Iraq. Morons!!!!


6 posted on 09/29/2006 12:11:16 PM PDT by good_ole_texas_boy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

Or the Morlocks


7 posted on 09/29/2006 12:15:53 PM PDT by steel_resolve (Do you know what a bigot is? Someone winning an argument with a liberal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

EX-TER-MIN-ATE!


8 posted on 09/29/2006 12:34:22 PM PDT by Redcitizen (When you have to shoot, shoot, don't talk. -Tuco)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Angel

With China and Russia buliding up their strategic forces and both of those countries posessing ABM systems of our own, why can't we have one???


9 posted on 09/29/2006 1:57:20 PM PDT by Thunder90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Young Werther

Raise Shields, ready phasers, Load torpedo bays...


10 posted on 09/29/2006 1:58:28 PM PDT by Thunder90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Angel

Russia is also trying to hamper our sattelites...


11 posted on 09/29/2006 1:59:05 PM PDT by Thunder90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Angel

Such a surprise! The Dems don't want us to have weapons?


12 posted on 09/29/2006 2:34:59 PM PDT by pankot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thunder90

Your are looking in wrong direction.
http://www.qglt.com/bbs/ReadFile?whichfile=102057&typeid=15


13 posted on 09/30/2006 6:18:26 AM PDT by Sergei_DV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Angel

14 posted on 09/30/2006 6:27:20 AM PDT by patton (Sanctimony frequently reaps its own reward.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Angel

Now if we can just fit these on sharks heads, we will be in business.


15 posted on 09/30/2006 6:35:08 AM PDT by VanDeKoik (Fitzmas Has Been Canceled.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CaptRon
It should be crystal clear to everyone, we must surrender NOW or run the risk of hurting the feelings of those determined to destroy us.
16 posted on 10/03/2006 5:44:46 PM PDT by NickFlooding (Canceling out liberal votes since 1972.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson