Skip to comments.
Administration Researches Laser Weapon (encouraging news)
New York Times ^
| May 3, 2006
| WILLIAM J. BROAD
Posted on 09/29/2006 12:03:09 PM PDT by Angel
The Bush administration is seeking to develop a powerful ground-based laser weapon that would use beams of concentrated light to destroy enemy satellites in orbit.
The largely secret project, parts of which have been made public through Air Force budget documents submitted to Congress in February, is part of a wide-ranging effort to develop space weapons, both defensive and offensive. No treaty or law forbids such work.
But some Congressional Democrats and other experts fault the research as potential fuel for an antisatellite arms race that could ultimately hurt this nation more than others because the United States relies so heavily on military satellites, which aid navigation, reconnaissance and attack warning.
(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...
TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Politics/Elections; Technical; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: china; defense; laser; russia; weapons
This is an old article, but with the discussion of China trying to hamper our satellites I thought it was encouraging news.
Of course the Democrats are against it.
1
posted on
09/29/2006 12:03:10 PM PDT
by
Angel
To: Angel
The gas dynamic laser system for the Airborne Laser System has been tested and is in final operational testing phase. It was reported several years ago that the Air Force was testing a tactical laser which would be mounted on F-16 fighter jets and would function very similar to the Tie Fighters of Star Wars fame.
Luke lower your visor!!!
To: Angel
But some Congressional Democrats and other experts fault the research as potential fuel for an antisatellite arms race that could ultimately hurt this nation more than others because the United States relies so heavily on military satellites, which aid navigation, reconnaissance and attack warning. Of course they do. More from the put-a-flower-in-the-rifle-muzzle crowd.
3
posted on
09/29/2006 12:06:53 PM PDT
by
CaptRon
(Pedecaris alive or Raisuli dead)
To: Angel
But some Congressional Democrats
But some Congressional Democrats
But some Congressional Democrats
But some Congressional Democrats
But some Congressional Democrats
But some Congressional Democrats
But some Congressional Democrats
AD NAUSEUM
4
posted on
09/29/2006 12:10:17 PM PDT
by
steel_resolve
(Do you know what a bigot is? Someone winning an argument with a liberal.)
To: steel_resolve
Don't Democrats rmind you of the Daleks.
5
posted on
09/29/2006 12:11:11 PM PDT
by
muawiyah
To: Angel
The logic of the DemocRATS opposition is pure idiocy. They oppose it saying it would cause our enemies to more likely attack our satellites. Same logic they employ in Iraq. Morons!!!!
To: muawiyah
7
posted on
09/29/2006 12:15:53 PM PDT
by
steel_resolve
(Do you know what a bigot is? Someone winning an argument with a liberal.)
To: muawiyah
8
posted on
09/29/2006 12:34:22 PM PDT
by
Redcitizen
(When you have to shoot, shoot, don't talk. -Tuco)
To: Angel
With China and Russia buliding up their strategic forces and both of those countries posessing ABM systems of our own, why can't we have one???
9
posted on
09/29/2006 1:57:20 PM PDT
by
Thunder90
To: Young Werther
Raise Shields, ready phasers, Load torpedo bays...
To: Angel
Russia is also trying to hamper our sattelites...
To: Angel
Such a surprise! The Dems don't want us to have weapons?
12
posted on
09/29/2006 2:34:59 PM PDT
by
pankot
To: Thunder90
To: Angel
14
posted on
09/30/2006 6:27:20 AM PDT
by
patton
(Sanctimony frequently reaps its own reward.)
To: Angel
Now if we can just fit these on sharks heads, we will be in business.
15
posted on
09/30/2006 6:35:08 AM PDT
by
VanDeKoik
(Fitzmas Has Been Canceled.)
To: CaptRon
It should be crystal clear to everyone, we must surrender NOW or run the risk of hurting the feelings of those determined to destroy us.
16
posted on
10/03/2006 5:44:46 PM PDT
by
NickFlooding
(Canceling out liberal votes since 1972.)
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson