More from the article:
A letter on Brosnan's Web site questioning the project's impact was signed by Barbra Streisand, Cindy Crawford, Martin Sheen, Tom Hanks, Sting and Charlize Theron.
Babs is opposed to it? Who would've thunk??
If Babs is opposed, then it really is a GREAT idea!
1 posted on
09/16/2006 9:01:20 AM PDT by
JRios1968
To: JRios1968
I believe these idiots do such things to give them something to talk about at their social gatherings. I suppose it gets them a little camera time as well.....
2 posted on
09/16/2006 9:07:17 AM PDT by
KoRn
To: JRios1968
Hollywood type + newly developed "social conscience" =
career-wise
5 posted on
09/16/2006 9:15:51 AM PDT by
yankeedame
("Oh, I can take it but I'd much rather dish it out.")
To: JRios1968
"Pierce Brosnan"
Uh... why does this FOREIGNER give a shiite what's built off the coast of the USA. If he's so ticked, why doesn't he go back where he came from, the UK?
Hmm, couldn't be because he's avoiding the draconian UK taxes could it? Nah, a liberal wouldn't do that.
7 posted on
09/16/2006 9:24:27 AM PDT by
Condor51
("Alot" is NOT a word and doesn't mean "many". It is 'a lot', two separate words.)
To: JRios1968
Good afternoon.
"If Babs is opposed, then it really is a GREAT idea!"
I'm opposed to the idea, too, almost as much as I'm opposed to the idea that Babs is still wasting good American air.
There are high seas and pearly silver fogs and lots of shipping races though the channel. I've scurried out of the way of fast moving tankers and container ships in those waters several times, without the big guys even acknowledging my presence. A collision is almost certain one day and if it involves an LPG tanker the effect can be catastrophic.
Worse than this were plans to build a terminal at Point Conception. Some of the worst conditions on the west coast are to be found there.
Michael Frazier
8 posted on
09/16/2006 9:30:18 AM PDT by
brazzaville
(no surrender no retreat, well, maybe retreat's ok)
To: JRios1968
Ya know, whats REALLY interesting is that these idiots have been spouting off about creating and using cleaner sources of fuel, but when someone actually proposes doing exactly that, they protest it. WTF
Proof that the Left does not have 2 brain cells to rub together.
9 posted on
09/16/2006 9:37:19 AM PDT by
Danae
(Anál nathrach, orth' bháis's bethad, do chél dénmha)
To: JRios1968
Click the Pic J
12 posted on
09/16/2006 9:41:15 AM PDT by
Fiddlstix
(Warning! This Is A Subliminal Tagline! Read it at your own risk!(Presented by TagLines R US))
To: JRios1968
Of course they are opposed to it.
I would provide relatively clean fuel at a lower cost.
(So would a nuclear power plant)
They oppose they measures, if they pass they would have nothing to complain about!
14 posted on
09/16/2006 9:56:15 AM PDT by
truemiester
(If the U.S. should fail, a veil of darkness will come over the Earth for a thousand years)
To: JRios1968
N I M B Y bump!
16 posted on
09/16/2006 10:01:29 AM PDT by
upchuck
(Q:Why does President Bush support amnesty for illegal aliens? A:Read this: http://tinyurl.com/nyvno)
To: JRios1968
The $800 million terminal would be located 14 miles off the coast of Malibu. That explains it. NIMBY-ism from the rich and famous who inhabit the utral exclusive Malibu Colony. If the Hollyweird twits really wanted to protect the environment, they'd clear out of Malibu Colony and turn it into a nature preserve.
22 posted on
09/16/2006 4:41:28 PM PDT by
Wolfstar
To: JRios1968
From fire eater to lame protestor...these hollyweird types really think a lot of themselves.
Embarrasing...
26 posted on
09/16/2006 4:46:21 PM PDT by
eleni121
('Thou hast conquered, O Galilean!' (Julian the Apostate))
To: JRios1968
I wonder if he's still a fall-down drunk, like the time I saw him several years ago - at lunchtime - at some Beverly Hills restaurant.
He was pounding 'em down at the bar the whole time we had a business lunch in the dining room....he left at the same time, and I'm astounded the valet let him have his car.
28 posted on
09/16/2006 4:54:30 PM PDT by
ErnBatavia
(Meep Meep)
To: JRios1968
Limosine libs and Gulfstream environmentalists.
Hypocrites.
32 posted on
09/16/2006 5:58:57 PM PDT by
mewzilla
(Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
To: JRios1968
Anyone opposing fuel production facilities should be required to relinquish all of their fuel consuming 'gadgets'.
33 posted on
09/16/2006 6:01:27 PM PDT by
lawdude
(Bill Clinton is a virus and should be treated as such.)
To: JRios1968
>>>Pierce Brosnan and other celebrities on Friday protested plans to build a liquefied natural gas terminal off the coast of Southern California.<<<
I am outraged that this idiot (Brosnan) has caused the Bond movies I have in my collection to be no longer palatable. I demand my money back.
To: JRios1968
"The $800 million terminal would be located 14 miles off the coast of Malibu."
That's what this is all about.
(spoiled rich babies)
35 posted on
09/16/2006 6:12:45 PM PDT by
Cringing Negativism Network
(Tehran: Iran leader insists development of gas chambers, ovens marked "Jews", is for peaceful use.)
To: JRios1968
Hey Pierce, shut up and act!
38 posted on
09/16/2006 8:55:22 PM PDT by
COEXERJ145
(Free Republic is Currently Suffering a Pandemic of “Bush Derangement Syndrome.”)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson