"Many people find this shocking," continued Singer, "yet they support a woman's right to have an abortion." Concluding his point, Singer said, "One point on which I agree with opponents of abortion is that, from the point of view of ethics rather than the law, there is no sharp distinction between the foetus and the newborn baby." Well then their is no distinction between a fetus and a fully grown eugenicist, so may Singer should abort himself.
1 posted on
09/12/2006 4:28:09 PM PDT by
wagglebee
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-64 next last
To: cgk; Coleus; cpforlife.org; Mr. Silverback; narses
2 posted on
09/12/2006 4:28:36 PM PDT by
wagglebee
("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
To: 8mmMauser; T'wit; BykrBayb; floriduh voter; Irish_Thatcherite
Ping.
This is totally disgusting!
3 posted on
09/12/2006 4:29:29 PM PDT by
wagglebee
("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
To: 69ConvertibleFirebird; Alexander Rubin; An American In Dairyland; Antoninus; Aquinasfan; BIRDS; ...
Moral Absolutes Ping! Freepmail wagglebee or little jeremiah to subscribe or unsubscribe from the moral absolutes ping list.
FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
[ Add keyword moral absolutes to flag FR articles to this ping list ]
First they want to kill the unborn, then the newborn and the infirmed, next it will be whomever they deem "unworthy of living." It is no different than Hitler.
4 posted on
09/12/2006 4:31:10 PM PDT by
wagglebee
("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
To: wagglebee
Singer does not like to be compared to the Nazi's
![](http://www.markdery.com/archives/images/SWASTIKA.gif)
6 posted on
09/12/2006 4:32:01 PM PDT by
Michael Goldsberry
(Lt. Bruce C. Fryar USN 01-02-70 Laos)
To: wagglebee
Singer is a Nazi - but at least he is consistent. He'll kill anyone!
7 posted on
09/12/2006 4:32:11 PM PDT by
Aussie Dasher
(The Great Ronald Reagan & John Paul II - Heaven's Dream Team!)
To: wagglebee
"Singer does not like to be compared to the Nazi's especially since his parents died in the Holocaust"
Talk about not learning from history .....
8 posted on
09/12/2006 4:32:45 PM PDT by
Disturbin
(Welcome to society -- morons with keys)
To: wagglebee
Ahh, Singer, everyone's favorite nutcase.
9 posted on
09/12/2006 4:33:12 PM PDT by
ahayes
("The wicked flee when no one is pursuing, but the righteous are as bold as a lion." -- Prov 28:1)
To: wagglebee
And I repeat, the morally disabled should be summarily fired from any position of authority or responsibility.
10 posted on
09/12/2006 4:33:53 PM PDT by
bvw
To: wagglebee
Singer has advocated killing unwanted babies ever since he was hired at Princeton. Apparently, that's why he was hired.
He also advocates bestiality.
Princeton has really gone down the tubes, with the rest of the Ivy League Colleges. Alumni should not give them a dime while they have monsters like Singer on their payroll.
11 posted on
09/12/2006 4:34:19 PM PDT by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: wagglebee
At least this guy takes a consistent position unlike most people who call themselves pro-choice. This is what groups like NARAL really believe but are afraid to say, for now.
To: wagglebee
Singer is a supreme Darwinist. This kind of horrific thinking is its natural ourworking.
14 posted on
09/12/2006 4:35:38 PM PDT by
JCEccles
To: wagglebee
So does that mean we can kill people who have become disabled later in life?
Surely Stevie Wonder, Steven Hawking, Helen Keller, Franklin Roosevelt, Marlee Matlin and Christopher Reeve would have had to been killed when they became disabled.
Right?
16 posted on
09/12/2006 4:37:52 PM PDT by
msnimje
(What part of-- "DEATH TO AMERICA" --do the Democrats not understand?)
To: wagglebee
Singer advances what I consider to be an evil position. But it is good that he does so in an up-front manner. The man who advances his evil position by stealth and with lies is a far greater danger.
17 posted on
09/12/2006 4:38:01 PM PDT by
gridlock
(The 'Pubbies will pick up at least TWO seats in the Senate and FOUR seats in the House in 2006)
To: wagglebee
People who oppose Singer's position have maintained that Singer is the logical extension of the culture of death and that society will eventually embrace his stance if there is no shift to the culture of life. Exactly right! I would bet that the majority of the opinion shapers in the MSM embrace his viewpoint right now.
To: wagglebee
![](http://www.bibl.u-szeged.hu/bibl/mil/ww2/who/pics/himmler.jpg)
Vell, Herr Doktor Singer, ve may may a place for uns in our Third Reich!
20 posted on
09/12/2006 4:42:23 PM PDT by
texson66
("Tyranny is yielding to the lust of the governing." - Lord Moulton)
To: wagglebee
Peter is one of the most evil men on planet earth. One wonders why lightening hasn't struck him yet. The problem is so many agree with him and revere him. Mostly liberal democrats of course, but also many in the medical profession have been brainwashed and desensitizes to death.
To: wagglebee
Asked, "Would you kill a disabled baby?", Singer responded, "Yes, if that was in the best interests of the baby and of the family as a whole."![Abortus of Borg](http://www.strangepolitics.com/images/content/12516.jpg)
23 posted on
09/12/2006 4:43:36 PM PDT by
Prime Choice
(True Conservatives don't vote for Liberals just because they have an 'R' by their name.)
To: wagglebee
Well if it is just that simple let me give it a shot.... Ahem.
" Question: Should professor singer be allowed to live?"
"Not if it is in the best interest of society...." And whom is to decide what is in the best interest of society? Why not Free Republic? Seems like a perfectly acceptable authority in which to decide Dr. Singers value and usefulness....
That logic holds as much validity as Singers. I am wondering if he would like to live under such a decision making strategy?
To: wagglebee
[The Euthanasia Prevention Coalition leader concluded, "even though Singer does not like to be compared to the Nazi's especially since his parents died in the Holocaust, his philosophical position is identical to what the Nazi's proposed. The Euthanasia Prevention Coalition is primarily concerned for the lives of people with disabilities and other vulnerable persons."]
I wonder who raised Singer, if his parents died in the Holocaust - their jailers? Or maybe it was wolves.
25 posted on
09/12/2006 4:44:23 PM PDT by
khnyny
To: wagglebee
If I really had to make such a decision, I'd kill the cows I'd rather kill a cow than Peter Singer, the cow is much better to eat.
26 posted on
09/12/2006 4:44:26 PM PDT by
Alouette
(Psalms of the Day: 90-96)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-64 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson