Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Torrent of Unedited Path to 9/11 ???

Posted on 09/10/2006 1:51:22 PM PDT by WinDeveloper

Can anyone point me to a torrent of the uncut version of path to 9/11???


TOPICS: War on Terror; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: benedictarnolds; bildo; clintoon; dontzotallnewbies; ibtz; pathto911
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last
To: LasVegasMac
Feeling the heat?

No, but I'm finding out how quickly people can turn snotty here, and over something fairly minor.

Since when have you been able to down load software / files from FR??

Never.

IIRC They don't have to host the files. There are a number of forums related to DOS, abandonware, etc. which prohibit the posting of links to copyrighted software, etc.

Whether they can get into trouble for simply having a link to warez, booglet, etc. I don't know. I do know they delete such posts.

41 posted on 09/10/2006 2:28:32 PM PDT by holymoly ("A lot" is TWO words.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: WinDeveloper

I'm sure this is nothing compared to "The Clinton Cronicles". Interesting that Clinton's "legal team" never sued over that movie, probably because they couldn't dispute ANY of its content. Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm.


42 posted on 09/10/2006 2:37:28 PM PDT by nonessential-personel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mass55th

And notice how he hasn't responded to any post. Typical troll.


43 posted on 09/10/2006 2:41:34 PM PDT by RedRover
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: RedRover
"And notice how he hasn't responded to any post. Typical troll."

Yep. I was going to write that myself but figured by the time I posted it, somebody else would have beat me to it.

44 posted on 09/10/2006 2:45:09 PM PDT by mass55th (Courage is being scared to death - but saddling up anyway~~John Wayne)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: RedRover

I am NOT a troll and I have indeed responded to a post; apparently you didn't look carefully enough.

Anyway, how does having the desire to see an unedited copy of this film make me a "troll" anyway???


45 posted on 09/10/2006 2:45:13 PM PDT by WinDeveloper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: WinDeveloper
Anyway, how does having the desire to see an unedited copy of this film make me a "troll" anyway???

It doesn't. I'm interested in a "before and after" comparison, myself.

46 posted on 09/10/2006 2:46:23 PM PDT by Pearls Before Swine (Is /sarc really needed?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: holymoly
I'm finding out how quickly people can turn snotty here, and over something fairly minor.

Ignore them. You were right. This is obviously a stupid post by a troll looking to report back to the DUmmies. And the troll didn't even have the good manners to be entertaining.

47 posted on 09/10/2006 2:48:24 PM PDT by RedRover
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: RedRover

Your level of paranoia is pretty amazing.

I have no other motive than wanting to see the film as it was intended.

But, since my question seemed to upset so many people, forget I asked.


48 posted on 09/10/2006 2:57:04 PM PDT by WinDeveloper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: RedRover
Ignore them. You were right.

I don't know if I was right or not.

I do agree with Tinians' post #32.

49 posted on 09/10/2006 3:10:10 PM PDT by holymoly ("A lot" is TWO words.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

I just watched scene one, is this what abc wanted to show and backed off?


50 posted on 09/10/2006 3:12:01 PM PDT by thiscouldbemoreconfusing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: WinDeveloper
Review the censored portions - 6 clips - See post #25 and watch the rest on TV. They couldn't have taken out all the good (bad?) parts. Could they?
;-)
51 posted on 09/10/2006 3:35:28 PM PDT by Tunehead54 (Nothing funny here ;-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas

Not according to the writer of "Path to 9/11". On Hannity's Fri. show he (the writer) said that NO ONE had been shown the second part.


52 posted on 09/10/2006 3:37:42 PM PDT by Roccus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: WinDeveloper

Some folks here are a bit edgy over this. Don't take offense, just let it play out.


53 posted on 09/10/2006 3:39:27 PM PDT by Roccus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: WinDeveloper

I wont forget, it was a great question. :)


54 posted on 09/10/2006 3:52:55 PM PDT by RaceBannon (Innocent until proven guilty: The Pendleton 8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: WinDeveloper

First, Welcome to FR.

It's yet to be determined if there is an uncut version.

Rush Limbaugh was given a copy last week, before the final editing.

I plan to listen to him tomorrow to get his opinion of tonight's broadcast.


55 posted on 09/10/2006 3:58:44 PM PDT by onyx (1 Billion Muslims -- IF only 10% are radical, that's still 100 Million who want to kill us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: onyx
It's yet to be determined if there is an uncut version.

LoL!!!

56 posted on 09/10/2006 4:04:13 PM PDT by don-o (Proudly posting without reading the thread since 1998. (stolen from one cool dude))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative
Thank you. I just sent them to all my friends.

I've heard that Part II tomorrow is unsparing on Bush. Thus, Bush, who was in office for 8 months, takes all the hits. And the real culprit, Bill Clinton, who was in office for 8 years--- gets off the hook.

You just KNOW he's smug tonight. You just KNOW it...

57 posted on 09/10/2006 6:30:26 PM PDT by melt (Someday, they'll wish their Jihad... Jihadn't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: WinDeveloper
I think you joined four years and 364 days late....

Did you get the word "torrent" by translating "stream" from an Igbo to American English dictionary?

58 posted on 09/10/2006 6:36:16 PM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (NYT Headline: 'Protocols of the Learned Elders of CBS: Fake But Accurate, Experts Say.')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mware

Not so with DVD's, though they are regionalized for copyright and "cultural" reasons. Saudis don't want their womenfolk seeing the nasty bits.


59 posted on 09/10/2006 6:38:25 PM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (NYT Headline: 'Protocols of the Learned Elders of CBS: Fake But Accurate, Experts Say.')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: mass55th
Ever hear of Google?

In fairness, Freepers are better googlers and make a lot of intelligent surmises that lead to better results than one lone, lost soul googling by himself.

Why google when thousands stand ready to do it for you?

60 posted on 09/10/2006 6:43:11 PM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (NYT Headline: 'Protocols of the Learned Elders of CBS: Fake But Accurate, Experts Say.')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson