"Crunch time" for the Moobats re: ABC's Path to 911

Email f rom the DNC | Sept 8, 2006 | Tom McMahon

[Jim Robinson]

Dear Jim,

This is it: crunch time for getting the slanderous ABC television docudrama "The Path to 9/11" yanked off the air. The network schedule has this slanderous attack on Democrats slated to start on Sunday night, September 10, at 8 o'clock -- and as long as it stays on the schedule, we have work to do. Take a minute right now and tell Disney president Robert Iger to keep this right-wing propaganda off our airwaves:

http://www.democrats.org/pathto911

Here's the good news: the suits at ABC and the Walt Disney Company have started panicking under pressure, thanks to your ferocious response to the outrageous decision to put this irresponsible miniseries on the air. But until Disney quits defending its plan to broadcast conservative propaganda -- fraudulently presented to Americans as "based on the 9/11 Commission Report" -- the company should plan to keep taking every bit of heat we dish out.

Here's a quick catch-up on developments over the last 48 hours:

* President Clinton, through his attorney, rebuked ABC for producing a "factually and incontrovertibly inaccurate" miniseries -- and walked the network through three make-believe scenes in the "the Path to 9/11" that defame people and misrepresent events during his administration.

* Clinton's spokesman later stepped up the pressure, condemning Disney as "despicable" for "airing a fictional version of what is a serious and emotional event for our country. No reputable organization," he said, "should dramatize 9-11 for a profit at the expense of the truth."

* The families of September 11 victims have weighed in on the controversy, telling "entertainers" not to "promote misleading or incorrect information as fact to the public."

* House and Senate Democratic leaders hammered Disney president and CEO Robert Iger, in letters that questioned the company's commitment to its "reputation ... as a corporation worthy of the trust of the American people and the United States Congress."

* Scholastic has pulled teaching materials off its website and has scrambled to adopt a plan to help teachers show students "the differences between factual reporting and a dramatization," but is still encouraging teachers to show their students this propaganda.

We should all be deeply concerned and disappointed that ABC would air a film that has been proven to have factual inaccuracies about one of the most important events in our nation's history. It's particularly disturbing given that the producer of the piece is a well known conservative. It's incomprehensible how something like this could even get on the air.

In a few hours, we deliver letters from over 150,000 outraged Democrats to ABC's front doorstep. You still have time to make your feelings known. Join the thousands standing up for President Clinton and our party -- tell Disney president Robert Iger to keep ABC's right-wing propaganda off our airwaves:

http://www.democrats.org/pathto911

Thank you, Tom

Tom McMahon Executive Director Democratic National Committee

>>> "Tom McMahon, Democratic Party" 9/6/2006 5:53 pm >>>

Dear Jim,

Does a major national broadcast network want to stain itself by presenting an irresponsible, slanderous, fraudulent, "docu-drama" to the American public?

Not if you and I have the last word -- but either way, we're about to find out.

The ABC television network -- a cog in the Walt Disney empire -- unleashed a promotional blitz in the last week for a new "docudrama" called "The Path to 9/11". ABC has thrown its corporate might behind the two-night production, and bills it as a public service: a TV event, to quote the ABC tagline, "based on the 9/11 Commission Report".

That's false. "The Path to 9/11" is actually a bald-faced attempt to slander Democrats and revise history right before Americans vote in a major election.

The miniseries, which was put together by right-wing conservative writers, relies on the old GOP playbook of using terrorism to scare Americans. "The Path to 9/11" mocks the truth and dishonors the memory of 9/11 victims to serve a cheap, callous political agenda. It irresponsibly misrepresents the facts and completely distorts the truth.

ABC/Disney executives need to hear from the public and understand that their abuse of the public trust comes with a cost. Tell Walt Disney CEO Robert Iger to keep this right-wing propaganda off the air -- we'll deliver your message:

http://www.democrats.org/pathto911

This story is breaking quickly. The bias of the "docudrama" only became known when ABC began circulating previews recently. Less than two weeks ago, 9/11 Commission member Richard Ben-Veniste confronted a lead writer of "The Path to 9/11" after watching the first half of the miniseries at a screening, but most of what we know amounts to bits and pieces because ABC chose to screen the miniseries to conservative bloggers and right-wing media outlets exclusively. Almost none of the Democrats portrayed in the film have even been asked for their thoughts.

But we still know enough, thanks to news accounts and crack research, to fact check "The Path to 9/11" as a biased, irresponsible mess. Here's what you need to know:

* Richard Clarke -- the counterterrorism czar for the Clinton administration, now himself a consultant to ABC News -- describes a key scene in "The Path to 9/11" as "180 degrees from what happened." In the scene, a CIA field agent places a phone call to get the go ahead to kill Osama Bin Laden, then in his sights, only to have a senior Clinton administration official refuse and hang up the phone. Sandy Berger, President Clinton's National Security Advisor, called the same scene "a total fabrication. It did not happen." And Roger Cressey, a top Bush and Clinton counterterrorism official, said it was "something straight out of Disney and fantasyland. It's factually wrong. And that's shameful."

* Another scene revives the old right-wing myth that press reporting made it impossible to track Osama bin Laden, accusing the Washington Post of blowing the secret that American intelligence tracked his satellite phone calls. In reality, responsibility for that blunder -- contrary to "The Path to 9/11" -- rests with none other than the arch-conservative Washington Times.

* The former National Security Council head of counterterrorism says that President Clinton "approved every request made of him by the CIA and the U.S. military involving using force against bin Laden and al-Qaeda," and the 9/11 report says the CIA had full authority from President Clinton to strike Bin Laden. Yet chief "Path to 9/11" scriptwriter Cyrus Nowrasteh, a friend of Rush Limbaugh, says the miniseries shows how President Clinton had "frequent opportunities in the '90s to stop Bin Laden in his tracks -- but lacked the will to do so."

* ABC asked only the Republican co-chair of the 9/11 Commission, Tom Kean, Sr., to advise the makers of "The Path to 9/11". The producers optioned two books, one written by a Bush administration political appointee, as the basis of the screenplay -- yet bill the miniseries as "based on the 9/11 Commission Report."

This is a picture of bias -- a conservative attempt to rewrite the history of September 11 to blame Democrats, just in time for the election.

Tell Walt Disney president Robert Iger that you hold his company responsible -- and that this community demands that ABC tell the truth:

http://www.democrats.org/pathto911

ABC is trying to use of the airwaves -- airwaves owned by you and me, and loaned to broadcasters as a public trust -- to slander Democrats and sell a slanderous, irresponsible fraud to the American people, and they're shamefully doing it just weeks away from Election Day.

The Walt Disney Corporation could have given Americans an honest look at September 11. Instead, the company abandoned its duty to the truth -- and embraced the fiction known as "The Path to 9/11."

But ABC isn't the only company pushing this gross revision of history. ABC has enlisted the reputable education and children's entertainment company Scholastic, Inc. to send 100,000 letters to high school teachers, urging them to show students "The Path to 9/11". Scholastic has also created a discussion guide for teachers to use to encourage students and their families to watch this irresponsible fraud and then discuss it in school. The discussion guide does not in any way point out the concerns and criticisms that have been raised about the validity and accuracy of the film.

We've got to stop this now.

ABC/Disney must face an accountability moment. You can ratchet up the pressure on ABC by sending your own letter to Walt Disney CEO Robert Iger -- tell him to keep this propaganda off their air.

http://www.democrats.org/pathto911

We'll keep you up to date as this story evolves.

Thank you, Tom

Tom McMahon Executive Director Democratic National Committee

[bitt]

missed this thread -ping

[Valin]

For what it's worth the writer of Path to 911 will be on Sean Hannity's show monday to talk about what was cut from the film he made.

[bitt]

I have heard him interviewed several times already - he is pretty cool. I wish I could stay home Monday and just freep and watch and remember...

[Valin]

I always take 9-11 off from work. (for me) it's a day of reflection.

[bitt]

http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2001/09/20010911-16.a.ram

President Bush that night. radio.

[Boazo]

('http://cosmos.bcst.yahoo.com/up/news;_ylt=AsDJKWRRlX36aabMrx.e.dKyFz4D;_ylu=X3oDMTBhNXIwMGFqBHNlYwN2cHJvbW8-?ch=49799&cl=826702&lang=en

[FreeReign]

The Democrats did control what the public knew and learned. Their control has been getting less and less.

No, the Dems/liberal media still have GREAT CONTROL (I prefer to use the word "effect") over public opinion!

The Media still has too much control. But, with talk radio and the internet, their control has been getting less and less.

And it is good to see the liberals out in the open having to beat back a criticle-of-Clinton program. Not to long ago this kind of program would never have gotten has far as it has now and all the political pressure by the left against it would have been hidden and seamless.

[beyond the sea]

The Media still has too much control. But, with talk radio and the internet, their control has been getting less and less.

LOL........ pardon me, but may I guess that you are under 40 years of age (not that there is anything wrong with that)? ;-)

Not to long ago this kind of program would never have gotten has far as it has now

Proof reading is your friend.

Good luck in the future. Maybe you are under 30, eh???

;-)

[FreeReign]

The Media still has too much control. But, with talk radio and the internet, their control has been getting less and less.

LOL........ pardon me, but may I guess that you are under 40 years of age

So the Internet and talk radio has had no effect on public opinion?

LOL!

...and therefor I must be under 40?

LOL!

That's no and no again.

Are you even a major?

[beyond the sea]

You've answered my question.

LOL.... and goodbye.

[FreeReign]

LOL.... and goodbye.

Did you mean "good-bye"?

LOL!

[beyond the sea]

Did you mean "good-bye"?

I certainly did.

Now ........ you keep praying and convincing yourself that talk radio has overcome the old lying liberal media............ as you stil have never answered the question as to why when the economy is so good the citizens think it is so bad.

No... don't bother to try to answer.

You are dreaming..... and your youthful dreaming is one of the direct problems and a real cause of why conservatives may lose the elections in 2006 and 2008.

Young and dimpled........... and still faking it.

[Mr. Silverback]

Thanks a ton for posting this, jim. The reaction of the Clitoids to this movie guarantees that I will not only watch both episodes, but I will be writing down the sponsors and sending every one of them a thank you note.,P>

Funny how an unbiased retelling of the basic facts makes Bill Clinton and his crew look like the Gang That Couldn't Shoot Straight.

[FreeReign]

The Media still has too much control. But, with talk radio and the internet, their control has been getting less and less.

Now ........ you keep praying and convincing yourself that talk radio has overcome the old lying liberal media...

"Overcome"?

LOL!

I never, said "overcome". Nice straw man fallacy.

"Overcome" does not equal "too much...but...less and less", which is what I said. Try responding directly to things I've really said, okay?

Don't make things up.

Reality isn't your strong suit is it or is it reading comprehension?

[Mr. Silverback]

The families of September 11 victims have weighed in on the controversy, telling "entertainers" not to "promote misleading or incorrect information as fact to the public."

Three questions/comments:

1. Which 9/11 families? After all, there's a big difference in opinion between the hard-left "9/11 families for peace," Jersey Girls, etc. and the 9/11 families for security. I know of no one who actually speaks for the entire 9/11 family community. I'm betting the DNC is quoting Jersey Girls or allies here.

2. While many who worked on this film are technically "entertainers," this is not an entertainment film, and the fact that these people are entertainers has no bearing on whther they're presenting facts, or whether they have the right to mislead or tell the truth.

3. When Michael Moore produced a movie full of 9/11 lies, what did these same 9/11 families and the DNC have to say about it?

[beyond the sea]

Ladies U.S. Open tennis semi finals (Sharapova vs. Henin-Hardenne) this evening. Penn State and Notre Dame in college football right about now.

Take a deep breath kid.

You'll be smarter and happier in the morning.

[AZConser]

If only they went after the terrorists with such vigor.

The Clinoonistas and the Looney Liberal Left are SCARED SH$TLESS over this - we all deserve to see it and decide why they are throwing such a hissyfit!!!

[devolve]

[potlatch]

That's beautiful devolve, a fiery blue moon!