Skip to comments.
Reuters Caught with Doctored Lebanon Photo, Again
Newsbusters/Reuters ^
| August 28
| John Armor
Posted on 08/28/2006 5:14:42 AM PDT by Halfmanhalfamazing
You would think that Reuters learned its lesson about publishing to the world photos doctored to create a false image. After all, they were caught with multiple false photos from Lebanon, and had to take down more than 900 images from one stringer. Reuters promised it would have "experienced editors" look at all such photos in the future.
(Excerpt) Read more at newsbusters.org ...
TOPICS: News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 2006israelwar; 4thestate5thcolumn; alreuters; antiisrael; antisemites; biasmeanslayoffs; bullzogby; communisttrick; congame; crap; enemedia; fakephotos; fauxtography; goebbelswouldbeproud; hezbollah; hizbollywood; idiots; islamoganda; israel; lebanon; leftistsubversion; liberalmedia; makingitup; mediabias; mediajihad; mediawarwaronerror; middleeast; mslm; msm; msmwoes; needmorekeywords; pajamahadeen; pajamapeoplerule; picturekill; proterrorist; reuterbias; reutergate; reuterrorism; reuters; reutorrism; revisionisthistory; rotoreuters; rotorooters; terrorists; terrorsympathizers; traitors; treason; trysellingthetruth; whatabunchamorons; whywefight; zogbyism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-52 next last
To: Halfmanhalfamazing
I'm honestly surprised we don't see photoshoppery on other topics as well, not just from lebanon.We have... and it's most likely that inumerable images have been radically altered on ALL topics... if not flat-out 'created'. It's amazing what a trained, retoucher can do in Photoshop... in high-end advertising, you can earn a good living at it.
21
posted on
08/28/2006 5:43:39 AM PDT
by
johnny7
(“And what's Fonzie like? Come on Yolanda... what's Fonzie like?!”)
To: Carry_Okie
Totally agree. You can see the photo is shooting into a tough light situation. The open sky on the upper right most likely made the aperture close way down resulting in a dark picture. Lazy photoshop work trying to correct it, thats all.
Nothing to see here. Move along.
22
posted on
08/28/2006 5:44:43 AM PDT
by
baystaterebel
(http://omphalosgazer.blogspot.com/)
To: johnny7
"Shazam! They done it again???"
23
posted on
08/28/2006 5:45:40 AM PDT
by
COBOL2Java
(Freedom isn't free, but the men and women of the military will pay most of your share)
To: BallyBill
I agree, this is crying wolf. I think it should be removed from Breaking News.
24
posted on
08/28/2006 5:54:03 AM PDT
by
Paradox
(The "smarter" the individual, the greater his power of self-deception.)
To: hellinahandcart
I think it's "fake but accurate".....:)
25
posted on
08/28/2006 5:54:43 AM PDT
by
Salamander
(And don't forget my Dog; fixed and consequent.........)
To: baystaterebel
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^You can see the photo is shooting into a tough light situation. The open sky on the upper right most likely made the aperture close way down resulting in a dark picture.^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
That's not open sky. As Armor over at NB noted, that's not sky.
I've never seen the sky with clean writing on it. Have you?
It's got arabic writing on it, then it says "AL JANGUS", whatever that means.
26
posted on
08/28/2006 5:54:46 AM PDT
by
Halfmanhalfamazing
(Linux, the #2 OS. Mac, the #3 OS. That's why Picasa is on Linux and not Mac.)
To: dennisw; Cachelot; Nix 2; veronica; Catspaw; knighthawk; Alouette; Optimist; weikel; Lent; GregB; ..
If you'd like to be on this middle east/political ping list, please FR mail me.
High Volume. Articles on Israel can also be found by clicking on the Topic or Keyword Israel.
also Keywords 2006israelwar or WOT [War on Terror]
----------------------------
27
posted on
08/28/2006 5:55:56 AM PDT
by
SJackson
(The Pilgrims—Doing the jobs Native Americans wouldn't do!)
To: Halfmanhalfamazing
I'm more worried about Israel's doctored military apparatus.
To: Halfmanhalfamazing
Bush Derangement Syndrome is proven to prevent learning from past mistakes in 99.9% of journalists and dems.
To: COBOL2Java
You know what I'm talkin' about.
30
posted on
08/28/2006 6:01:57 AM PDT
by
johnny7
(“And what's Fonzie like? Come on Yolanda... what's Fonzie like?!”)
To: Rutles4Ever
31
posted on
08/28/2006 6:05:30 AM PDT
by
Halfmanhalfamazing
(Linux, the #2 OS. Mac, the #3 OS. That's why Picasa is on Linux and not Mac.)
To: Halfmanhalfamazing
"Yeah, you can see the washed out UN logo on it"
Washed out UN seems more appropriate!
To: Halfmanhalfamazing
All I see is little red x's.
33
posted on
08/28/2006 6:08:19 AM PDT
by
Terabitten
(The only time you can have too much ammunition is when you're swimming.)
To: Halfmanhalfamazing
I have taken thousands of pictures, edited them in photoshop, yadda yadda yadda I wont bore you with the details....
Thats a washed out sky. Note the roof tops and power lines also in that part of the frame. Your looking for a devious deception where none exists.
Save it for the real thing.
Its nothing more then a bad photo with bad photoshop work done to it.
34
posted on
08/28/2006 6:11:55 AM PDT
by
baystaterebel
(http://omphalosgazer.blogspot.com/)
To: All
I can't believe no one caught this. "A French United Nations vehicle". A white flag. Whats the running joke about France???????
Not only is it doctored...its a joke at the French military. Or France itself.
To: Halfmanhalfamazing
|
Sometimes I think people get their panties in a wad for the sake of that wedgies feeling. So what? This guy smiling at a white flag or a UN flag makes no difference to me. When I first clicked onto this thread, before I read the part about the smile directed to the white flag, I simply couldn't find any part of the picture that made me think anything other than this guy looks like a kid. The photographer probably saw the connection, took the shot and had to lighten it to get Nasrallah to even appear. Lightening the photo makes the image on photo paper look like the image the cameraman saw. That is not dishonest. It's no more dishonest than a photojournalist using a telephoto lens, or a polarizing one, or a sketch artist doing the graphic. Sometimes I think people need a bit more Zoloft in their lives.. |
36
posted on
08/28/2006 6:13:34 AM PDT
by
HawaiianGecko
(Timing has a lot to do with the outcome of a rain dance.)
To: BallyBill
Yeah, to us it's a non-event. But I think, to the average hezbo/hezbo- supporter on the street, it accomplishes what the propagandist/photographer intended.
37
posted on
08/28/2006 6:14:09 AM PDT
by
Roccus
To: hellinahandcart
The setting (a BIG SMILING Muslim dictator) is shown welcoming the UN army....
Having defeated the Evvvvvvvvvvvvviiiiiiiiiiil Israeli army.
Ya can't pay for that kind of propaganda to the world, and Reuters does it for free!
38
posted on
08/28/2006 6:15:22 AM PDT
by
Robert A Cook PE
(I can only donate monthly, but Hillary's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
To: wagglebee
The marquis of Nasrallah on the side of the building is pretty dark compared to the rest of the photograph. I'm still a novice in Photoshop, but it looks to me as if the contrast was pumped up so Nasrallah's face wasn't in the dark. It resulted in washing out the rest of the image.
As to the words hanging in the sky, I'd assumed they were letters on posts. You don't see them often in the US anymore but they're still around.
39
posted on
08/28/2006 6:18:44 AM PDT
by
Kieri
(A Grafted Branch (Rom. 11))
To: baystaterebel
^^^^^^^^^^I have taken thousands of pictures, edited them in photoshop, yadda yadda yadda I wont bore you with the details....^^^^^^^^^^
I don't doubt your experience, and that does appear to be sky, however I've never seen writing like that any time I've looked up.
If anything, it looks like it's a separate banner. Note the orange bar inbetween the nasrallah photo and what appears to be sky on the right.
Yellow writing doesn't appear in skies, but it does on wall/banners.
^^^^^^^^^^Save it for the real thing.^^^^^^^^^^
Yeah, I have to agree. However, with all that Reuters and other lib media outlets have done up until this point, you can't blame people for overscrutinizing.
40
posted on
08/28/2006 6:21:59 AM PDT
by
Halfmanhalfamazing
(Linux, the #2 OS. Mac, the #3 OS. That's why Picasa is on Linux and not Mac.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-52 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson