Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

"And so on. By tradition and temperament, a Marine infantry company is a blunt instrument, designed to storm a beach or take a building with force and violence that overwhelms the enemy; it's a hammer, not a scalpel.

Under the rules, if the suspects are running away, if they pose no direct and immediate threat to the Marines, the most the Marines can do is shoot "pyro," small flares, as a warning – a warning that Marines believe simply leaves the fleeing enemy laughing.

The Marines here know they are under close scrutiny – by the press, by the politicians and by the often fickle American public. And that knowledge permeates almost everything they do. But no one should doubt that American Marines and soldiers are paying for their restraint, and for the American concern about civilian casualties.

They are paying for it in blood – their own blood."

Every American should have to read this! again and again and again!

Semper Fi, Kelly

1 posted on 08/20/2006 6:22:40 AM PDT by kellynla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: SandRat; NormsRevenge

ping!


2 posted on 08/20/2006 6:23:34 AM PDT by kellynla (Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots! Semper Fi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kellynla

Fact.

bttt


3 posted on 08/20/2006 6:25:53 AM PDT by SE Mom (Proud mom of an Iraq war combat vet-pray for Israel))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kellynla

Ahh the joys of lawyers running a war!


4 posted on 08/20/2006 6:26:16 AM PDT by Bommer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kellynla

"Unnamed sources" yet again. I would expect after being lied to by the junk media over and over and over, that the Usual Whiners would finnally learn NOT to take every word they read in the Junk Media seriously. I say your sources are pure fiction make up by an Anti War bigot pretending to be a "Journalists" prove me wrong.


5 posted on 08/20/2006 6:26:40 AM PDT by MNJohnnie (History shows us that if you are not willing to fight, you better be prepared to die)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kellynla

One can only throw up their hands whenever they read a post by someone on FR commenting on how scandals such as Abu Gharib was much ado about nothing. It was not. Such bad press ensured the very harmful restraints on our troops that the above mentioned article details - all put in place in order to prevent any more bad news.


7 posted on 08/20/2006 6:30:30 AM PDT by KantianBurke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kellynla

Word up!


11 posted on 08/20/2006 6:33:32 AM PDT by Drango (A liberal's compassion is limited only by the size of someone else's wallet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kellynla

"But no one should doubt that American Marines and soldiers are paying for their restraint, and for the American concern about civilian casualties."

...with defeat!


13 posted on 08/20/2006 6:34:44 AM PDT by observer5 (It's not a War on Terror - it's a WAR ON STUPIDITY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kellynla
Welcome to the wornderful world of Counter Insurgency. This is why the "more boots on the ground" and "It's World War 3" screamers are so clueless.

Why are the vast bulk of the forces fighting and dying on OUR side are Muslim Iraqis?

Because we are fight the war smart instead of following the dogma of the "Nuke Fullgha Now" know nothings with their desperation to recreate the Soviet experience in Afghanistan for us in Iraq.

Conventional War and Anti Terrorist ops are completely different missions. Way past types FReepers come to grip with this fact instead of complaining endlessly about it

14 posted on 08/20/2006 6:35:21 AM PDT by MNJohnnie (History shows us that if you are not willing to fight, you better be prepared to die)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kellynla

At some point, the chair warmers and lawyers will have to give way to warriors, and the Dogs of War will be unleashed.

'Til then, our brave Marines and Soldiers will be wounded and die under these ridiculous RoE. Whoever came up with them should be awarded the Al Quaida Medal of Honor.


16 posted on 08/20/2006 6:36:20 AM PDT by Taxman (So that the beautiful pressure does not diminish!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kellynla

This is exactly what I have been told by several area soldiers who have come back from Iraq. Sickening, isn't it???


17 posted on 08/20/2006 6:41:29 AM PDT by Cricket24 (ULTRA PATRIOT!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kellynla


Home | About | Columnists | Blog | Subscribe | Donate

Two Marine Corps

by William S. Lind
by William S. Lind

Save a link to this article and return to it at www.savethis.comSave a link to this article and return to it at www.savethis.com Email a link to this articleEmail a link to this article Printer-friendly version of this articlePrinter-friendly version of this article View a list of the most popular articles on our siteView a list of the most popular articles on our site

Since sometime before Caesar was a lance corporal, the United States Marine Corps’ greatest fear has been becoming "a second land army." It has long believed that if the country perceived it had two armies, it would require one to go away, and that one would be the Marine Corps. It is therefore ironic that the United States now finds itself with not one, but two Marine Corps, and the final result may be that both disappear.

Almost any Marine knows the two Marine Corps of which I speak. One is the heir of the maneuver warfare movement of the 1970s and 80s, of Al Gray and Warfighting, of free play training, officer education focused on how to think, not what to do, of the belief that the highest goal of all Marines is winning in combat with the smallest possible losses. This is the Marine Corps that led the advance to Baghdad in the first phase of the ongoing war in Iraq. It is also the Marine Corps that recently "fought smart" in Fallujah by not taking the city.

The other Marine Corps’ highest goal is programs, money and bureaucratic success "inside the Beltway." Its priorities are absurdities such as the MV-22 "Albatross" and reviving the 1990s "Sea Worm" project under the label "distributed operations," which are referred to openly at Quantico as "putting lipstick on a pig." This Marine Corps is anti-intellectual, sees the First Generation culture of order as sacred, believes that sufficient rank justifies any idiot and regards politics, not combat, as the "real world."

Regrettably, in the war between these two Marine Corps, the second one is winning. I recently encountered a horrifying example of its success at the Marine Corps Command & Staff School at Quantico. At the end of this academic year, the Command & Staff faculty simply got rid of 250 copies of Martin van Creveld’s superb book, Fighting Power. This book, which lays out the fundamental difference between the Second Generation U.S. Army in World War II and the Third Generation Wehrmacht, is one of the seven books of "the canon," the readings that take you from the First Generation into the Fourth. It should be required reading for every Marine Corps and Army officer.

When I asked someone associated with Command & Staff how such a thing could be done, he replied that the faculty has decided it "doesn’t like" van Creveld. This is similar to a band of Hottentots deciding they "don’t like" Queen Victoria. Martin van Creveld is perhaps the most perceptive military historian now writing. But in the end, the books went; future generations of students at Command & Staff won’t have them.

A friend who attended the last Marine Corps General Officers’ conference reported the same division between the two Marine Corps. The officers from the field, he said, had completely different concerns from those stationed in Washington. They were ships passing in the night. But it is the interests of the Washington Marine Corps, not those in the field, that determine Marine Corps policy. And that policy is affected little, if at all, by the two wars in which Marines are now fighting.

Throughout my years as a Senate staffer, the Marine Corps’ clout on Capitol Hill was envied by the other services. The Marine Corps then had little money and not much interest in programs. Its message to Congress and to the American public was, "We’re not like the other services. We aren’t about money and stuff. We’re about war." That message brought the Corps unrivalled public and political support.

In the mid-1990s, the Marine Corps changed its message and, without realizing what it was doing, abandoned its successful grand strategy for survival. The new message became, "We are just like the other services. We too are now about money and programs." And that new message is what now dominates Headquarters Marine Corps and Quantico. Thinking about war is out; money and stuff is in. In effect, the Marine Corps has sat down at the highest-stakes poker game in the world, American defense politics, with 25 cents in its pocket. It simply cannot compete with the Army, Navy or Air Force at buying Congressional and public support. But it is determined to try.

If the dumb (and increasingly corrupt) "Washington" Marine Corps finally triumphs over the smart, Warfighting Marine Corps, in the end both will disappear. And that will be a shame, because the smart Marine Corps, Al Gray’s Marine Corps, really had something going. It was on its way to becoming the first American Third Generation armed service.

Maybe Martin van Creveld’s next book should be The Rise and Decline of the United States Marine Corps.

June 5, 2004

William Lind [send him mail] is Director of the Center for Cultural Conservatism at the Free Congress Foundation.

Copyright © 2004 William S. Lind

William Lind Archives

Back to LewRockwell.com Home Page


18 posted on 08/20/2006 6:42:33 AM PDT by gunnyg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kellynla

BTTT


19 posted on 08/20/2006 6:42:45 AM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kellynla

Politicians are not generals. Thus we are likely to make the same mistakes that were made in Viet Nam. We all know politicians never learn, and definitely never change.

I really hope we are making a difference. The different messages we are getting from the front are confusing. No wonder the war on terror in iraq is losing support.

Just like Viet Nam, the enemy is winning the propaganda war with the help of a willing and complicit news media.

How many years will it be before Americans are evacuated from the Embassy in Baghdad by chopper as Hezbollah and Al Queda militia march into the city? The ideological clensing is already taking place. Killing innocent Iraqis with car bombs and the kidnapping of pro government officials is scaring the people into subservience with the terror islamofacists.

We can kill the cockroaches. But there are millions more being brainwashed every day.


20 posted on 08/20/2006 6:43:27 AM PDT by o_zarkman44 (ELECT SOME WORKERS AND REMOVE THE JERKERS!.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kellynla
I just read it, Kelly, and it makes me so mad I could spit.

Rules of war? What could possible be more asinine? If war could be waged within rules of engagement with all sides obeying the referees or umpires and accepting and learning from the penalties for foul calls;why the hell would we have a war in the first place?

Rules of engagement, Geneva conventions etc., have never been respected by anyone on earth except the USA and has never spared our troops one iota of pain and suffering dished out by the enemy, but has caused too many of America's finest to be prosecuted (persecuted?) by our own government for alleged violations.

We can't afford to lose this war against brainless,merciless, and brutal Muslim Nazis, but we can't win it without giving them back in spades, every thing they give us. And/or doing unto them before they do unto us!
30 posted on 08/20/2006 7:55:31 AM PDT by F.J. Mitchell (But who or what can check or balance the appointed for life, dictatorial US Supreme Court?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kellynla

It is astounding that our politicians NEVER learn that they should not interfere when they commit troops to a combat zone. This sounds for all the world like the same ridiculous ROE that we were forced to endure in Beirut in 1983! The Reagan Administration was so afraid of appearing like warmongerers to the rest of the world that they imposed the "Peacekeeper" role to the most absurd extreme. No one could be engaged unless they were in the open act of engaging you first and then your response could not outweigh their method, if they were hitting you with small arms you could only respond with small arms, and that response first had to be DOD approved!

If they are going to tie the hands of this generation too then they need to start the withdrawel now because when you get targeted enough and don't respond the insurgency is only emboldened and their provocations will only escalate. I hate to see the Bush administration caving to world opinion when it comes to our folks in a combat zone. If they aren't allowed to do their jobs, let alone protect themselves then it is time to leave.

Semper Fidelis


33 posted on 08/20/2006 9:05:13 AM PDT by No more Demofascists
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kellynla

Police actions are losing prospects...but so are iron-fisted occupations.


42 posted on 08/20/2006 4:41:06 PM PDT by Name Withheld
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kellynla
Someone posted the article with the wrong title (terrorist's winning) and no direct link. The thread was pulled. Before it was, however, I made this observation reposted here:

This is an excellent article. It details how our boys hands are being tied, especially with the likes of Murtha. From the article:

True, in the rare event of an all-out firefight, a direct confrontation with the enemy, the rules change. When faced with a conventional attack by insurgents, Marines can respond conventionally, with overwhelming firepower.

But in routine, day-to-day operations, every single shot fired by Marines here must be documented and reviewed by higher command. Let me repeat that: Every single shot fired by Marines is reported to and reviewed by higher command – regimental level or above – to make sure that it conformed to the ROEs.

51 posted on 08/21/2006 8:51:54 AM PDT by CedarDave (RIP Coast Guard Lt. Jessica Hill & Petty Officer 2nd Class Steven Duque, died in Arctic service 8/17)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kellynla

Gee Bush, thanks for watching out for the religion of peacers. I guess my young ones will just have to take the incoming so it doesn't upset your little compassionate ass.


60 posted on 08/24/2006 3:05:16 PM PDT by Modok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kellynla
Once again the wisdom of the founding fathers becomes apparent in hindsight. The reason Congress was given exclusive power to declare war is the reason presidents in the post-WW II era have never asked for it: It requires the unified will of the country to declare war. This is hard to obtain. But without such unity there can be no national will to wage war, and hence modern "wars" quickly devolve into these sort of "police actions".
61 posted on 08/25/2006 7:55:53 AM PDT by AustinBill (consequence is what makes our choices real)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kellynla

Must Read-ROE-Col Sully....
http://www.network54.com/Forum/135069/message/1156615985/GyG%27sMailbag-+Re+Must+Read+%28ROE%29
http://www.network54.com/Forum/135069/message/1156615985/GyG%27sMailbag-+Re+Must+Read+%28ROE%29


62 posted on 08/27/2006 5:54:24 AM PDT by gunnyg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson