Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'Rules' of War Limit Marines(and Soldiers...Must read!)
Orange County Register ^ | August 20, 2006 | GORDON DILLOW

Posted on 08/20/2006 6:22:39 AM PDT by kellynla

We call it "the war in Iraq." But to many of the Marines here, it's not really a war – at least not on their side.

"They are fighting a war," a Marine from 3rd Battalion, 3rd Marine Regiment tells me – "they" meaning the insurgents lurking "outside the wire" of a Marine forward operating base in the Euphrates River town of Barwanah, in western Al Anbar province.

"But us?" the Marine goes on. "We aren't fighting a war. We're just doing a police action."

The young Marine is right. While the insurgents here and throughout Iraq battle American Marines and soldiers with deadly weapons of warfare – IEDs ("improvised explosive devices," or roadside bombs), sniper attacks, mortars, two of which exploded near this forward operating base just the day before – the Marines have to respond under "rules of engagement," or "ROEs," that would be familiar to any cop in America.

Are the Marines catching sniper rounds from a cluster of buildings in the city? In a conventional war, that would be reason enough to light up the buildings with suppressive fire.

But under the Iraq ROEs, unless the Marines get "P.I.D." or "positive identification" – eyes on a guy with a rifle, or a muzzle flash, something very localized and specific – they can't fire back.

Do the Marines see four young males fleeing the scene of an IED attack? The Marines can try to chase them down in vehicles or on foot – this while the Marines are carrying 60 or 70 pounds of equipment on their backs – but they can't even fire warning shots from their M-16s, much less lethal ones, to try to make them stop.

(Excerpt) Read more at ocregister.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government
KEYWORDS: marinecorps; marines; war
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 last
To: kellynla
Once again the wisdom of the founding fathers becomes apparent in hindsight. The reason Congress was given exclusive power to declare war is the reason presidents in the post-WW II era have never asked for it: It requires the unified will of the country to declare war. This is hard to obtain. But without such unity there can be no national will to wage war, and hence modern "wars" quickly devolve into these sort of "police actions".
61 posted on 08/25/2006 7:55:53 AM PDT by AustinBill (consequence is what makes our choices real)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

Must Read-ROE-Col Sully....
http://www.network54.com/Forum/135069/message/1156615985/GyG%27sMailbag-+Re+Must+Read+%28ROE%29
http://www.network54.com/Forum/135069/message/1156615985/GyG%27sMailbag-+Re+Must+Read+%28ROE%29


62 posted on 08/27/2006 5:54:24 AM PDT by gunnyg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson