Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

UN Plea To Europe To Back Lebanon Force With Troops
Breaking News.ie ^ | 8/19/06

Posted on 08/18/2006 9:34:44 AM PDT by areafiftyone

The United Nations appealed to European countries today to contribute troops to an expanded UN peacekeeping force in Lebanon to balance the commitments from Muslim countries, so that both Israel and Lebanon will view it as legitimate.

UN Deputy Secretary-General Mark Malloch Brown said there was promising news from Italy and Finland, but he stressed that more European nations are needed for the vanguard force of 3,500 troops that the UN wants on the ground by August 27.

Italy formally endorsed sending troops to Lebanon but did not commit itself to specific numbers. Finland formally decided to send up to 250 peacekeepers to Lebanon, but said they would not be deployed until November.

At a meeting of 49 potential troop-contributing nations yesterday, the only countries to offer mechanised infantry battalions which will be the front line of the expanded force were three Muslim countries – Bangladesh, Indonesia and Malaysia – and Nepal, which is predominantly Hindu.

Israel’s UN Ambassador Dan Gillerman said today “it would be very difficult if not inconceivable for Israel to accept troops from countries who do not recognise Israel ... to guard Israel’s safety.”

Malloch Brown stressed that the final decision on the composition of the force will be made by the United Nations, but he added: “It’s very important that Europe now steps forward.”

“We want this force that we deploy to have a kind of multinational, multilateral character so that it enjoys the confidence of both sides.”

The United Nations has been seeking “a Muslim-European or European-Muslim force” not only because of the interest of both groups in helping to maintain the ceasefire between Israel and Hezbollah militants in southern Lebanon but because the combination provides “a legitimacy that satisfies both sides to this conflict,” he said.

France, which commands the current 2,000-strong force known as UNIFIL, had been expected to make a significant new contribution that would form the backbone of the expanded force. But French President Jacques Chirac disappointed the United Nations and other countries by announcing that France would contribute just 200 combat engineers to its current 200-member contingent in Lebanon


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Israel; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2006israelwar; geopolitics; un; unifil
Mostly Muslim countries - Jeeze that'll work! NOT!! Now they will have a place to have a JIHAD PARRRTY!!
1 posted on 08/18/2006 9:34:46 AM PDT by areafiftyone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone

Well at least France can supply white flags, and any required cowardice, above and beyond what the Hezzies already have. They will need the white flags if Israel gets the right fighting leader in place with the guts to take down the Hezzie-based, Iran-dictated Lebanese government.


2 posted on 08/18/2006 9:39:33 AM PDT by EagleUSA (T)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA

I guess the Muslim troops can use the French white Flags for their headwraps.


3 posted on 08/18/2006 9:40:36 AM PDT by areafiftyone (Politicians Are Like Diapers - Both Need To Be Changed Often And For The Same Reason)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
“We want this force that we deploy to have a kind of multinational, multilateral character so that it enjoys the confidence of both sides.”

Wonderful...

When the US, Briitain and others, went to Iraq, we asked for help and they thumbed their noses at us. OK, it was pay us now or pay us later... what's the difference?

Now (which is the 'later' of the previous scenario) they are asked again, on basically the same errand... how many excuses will they come up with?
4 posted on 08/18/2006 9:41:17 AM PDT by SMARTY ("Stay together, pay the soldiers and forget everything else." Lucius Septimus Severus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
"French President Jacques Chirac disappointed the United Nations and other countries by announcing that France would contribute just 200 combat engineers to its current 200-member contingent in Lebanon."


5 posted on 08/18/2006 9:50:56 AM PDT by Grampa Dave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone

No-one but NO-ONE should send a force to serve under Field-Marshal Annan.


6 posted on 08/18/2006 9:59:22 AM PDT by agere_contra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone

The talks leading up to this ceasefire must have been very amusing. Didn't anyone think to ask if nations would participate BEFORE signing the deal to implement a ceasefire based on an international force being a major part of that deal?

DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!


7 posted on 08/18/2006 10:09:13 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (Bring your press credentials to Qana, for the world's most convincing terrorist street theater.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SMARTY
Next time some RAT spouts off about needing a coalition with former allies so we don't act unilaterally, remind them of this.

Old Europe is so militarily and politically impotent they can't even roust up a few hundred troops for a peace keeping mission.

They have ceased to have any standing in the world and need to be ignored when there is real work to do. They should not be included in any further negotiations about the Islamic problem.
8 posted on 08/18/2006 10:10:23 AM PDT by BigBobber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave

And these sons of Bs were the ones that championed a ceasefire backed up by an international force.

And we suckered for this?

Un-fricken believable!


9 posted on 08/18/2006 10:10:56 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (Bring your press credentials to Qana, for the world's most convincing terrorist street theater.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
France, which commands the current 2,000-strong force known as UNIFIL, had been expected to make a significant new contribution that would form the backbone of the expanded force. But French President Jacques Chirac disappointed the United Nations and other countries by announcing that France would contribute just 200 combat engineers to its current 200-member contingent in Lebanon.

Stabbed in the back... again.

France CANNOT be trusted. In many ways they are an outright enemy.

Will we ever learn?

10 posted on 08/18/2006 10:13:06 AM PDT by EternalHope (Boycott everything French forever. Including their vassal nations.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone

"The United Nations has been seeking “a Muslim-European or European-Muslim force” not only because of the interest of both groups"

???

Muslim (in Jews best interest - no)
European (in Jews best interest - no)


11 posted on 08/18/2006 10:15:22 AM PDT by Sax (You Done Tore Out My Heart And Stomped That Sucker Flat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
This would be hysterically funny if people's lives weren't riding on it. These are the people who announce haughtily and incessantly that they know far better than the stupid cowboys in the U.S. how to bring peace to a troubled region. Well, folks, it's crunch time and the area's being evacuated. I don't think November's going to cut it, and I know 200 French engineers certainly aren't.

So the issue is collective security and the participants aren't going to include the U.S. or Great Britain (at least at the moment). Step up, boys! Who wants to be taken seriously next time the topic comes up?

12 posted on 08/18/2006 10:18:16 AM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone

"The United Nations appealed to European countries today to contribute troops"...confirming what we already knew; the UN is impotent. Also confirming that it only gets anything done when the USA gets things done for it.


13 posted on 08/18/2006 10:41:28 AM PDT by villagerjoel (US of A!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: villagerjoel

Did I miss something? Why are the US and GB not included in this? Are we refusing? Do they not want us? Are we finally implementing some common sense and keeping our distance from the UN?


14 posted on 08/18/2006 10:46:11 AM PDT by villagerjoel (US of A!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson