Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US, FRANCE NARROW DIFFERENCES OVER LEBANON CEASEFIRE
AFP via The Tocqueville Connection ^ | 08/02/2006

Posted on 08/02/2006 2:04:39 PM PDT by Republicain

WASHINGTON, Aug 2, 2006 (AFP) - The United States and France have significantly narrowed their differences over how to achieve a ceasefire in Lebanon and could present a draft resolution to the UN Security Council by early next week, a senior US official said Wednesday.

"I would say that our point of view and the French point of view are really converging, to the point now where we are working off a single text of a draft resolution," State Department spokesman Sean McCormack said.

"We agree on all the major elements. It's now a question of how those elements fit together and how you memorialize, encapsulate those elements in texts of UN resolutions," he said. McCormack said Washington hoped to reach an agreement and submit the resolution at the UN within days, either this week or early next week. There were no immediate plans for a meeting of foreign ministers from the five Security Council permanent members -- the Britain, China, France, Russia and the US -- on the matter, he added.

Ambassadors from the five nations were holding intensive talks on the crisis in New York Wednesday, while senior US officials in Washington were also in constant touch with their counterparts in other capitals in a bid to thrash out a deal, officials said. France holds a key role in the negotiations because it is expected to provide the bulk of an international military force to be deployed in southern Lebanon as part of a deal to end three weeks of deadly fighting between Israel and the Lebanese Islamic militia Hezbollah.

The French, backed by fellow members of the European Union, have been pressing for an immediate cessation of fighting followed by a permanent ceasefire and a political deal that will involve disarming Hezbollah. Only then would an international military force be deployed to help the Lebanese army gain effective control over southern Lebanon and prevent future Hezbollah attacks on Israel.

The United States has insisted all the elements be "intertwined" and that a ceasefire cannot be ordered until the achievement of a political agreement involving Lebanon, Hezbollah and Israel. McCormack declined to provide details of the remaining issues under negotiation other than to say they centered primarily on "sequencing and timing" of the various elements.

But a senior US official who spoke on condition of anonymity said one issue involved the possible deployment of a "rapid reaction force" to southern Lebanon as soon as Israel and Hezbollah agree to halt the fighting. Such a force could help reassure Israel that Hezbollah would not take advantage of a lull in fighting to rearm its forces in southern Lebanon before the full-scale stabilization force can be put in place. The official said "the idea has some validity" and was part of the mix of discussions at the UN and between the various capitals.

McCormack cautioned that there remained a number of key issues to resolve before the ceasefire resolution would be ready. "There's still a lot of conversations to be had, but we are working very closely and very well with our friends and allies on this, and we hope to have action in the United Nations this week, if not in the coming days," he said.

McCormack also sought to counter reports that France had torpedoed planned talks this week in New York on the composition of the eventual stabilization force for southern Lebanon, saying the US agreed with a postponement of that meeting. "We actually support the idea of postponing that meeting that was going to be held tomorrow," he said. "We think now the focus should be -- and is -- on coming up with that initial resolution. We can have a discussion at the expert level about the specifics of generating this force at some point down the line," he said. Reports from the UN had blamed the postponement of the meetings on a French boycott.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: ceasefire; france; lebanon; us

1 posted on 08/02/2006 2:04:40 PM PDT by Republicain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Republicain

I don't like the sound of this at all. Any time we narrow our differences with France means we're going off the rails.


2 posted on 08/02/2006 2:05:24 PM PDT by MikeA (Not voting out of anger in November is a vote for Nancy Pelosi as Speaker of the House)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Republicain

B.S. -- France surrendered to the terrorist long time ago!


3 posted on 08/02/2006 2:06:47 PM PDT by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Republicain

Poor ole Chirac. The world is starting to close the pliers on Iran and Syria and their proxy armies. Some day, France may have to legitimize its socialist self, by actually selling goods to honest, above-board countries.

What a shocker for Chirac. He might even have to work for a living...


4 posted on 08/02/2006 2:06:50 PM PDT by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MikeA

LOL, my thoughts exactly :)


5 posted on 08/02/2006 2:06:58 PM PDT by soccer_maniac (My new blog: http://capitalistpundit.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Republicain

What a difference a little staged massacre and willing media accomplices can make...


6 posted on 08/02/2006 2:07:26 PM PDT by epluribus_2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MikeA

Don't worry. We haven't made any more than the usual noises for "restraint", the UN is worthless, Israel won't agree to a "cease fire" until there's a UN force in place and that will take months, and nobody wants to be in a UN force anyway.


7 posted on 08/02/2006 2:09:36 PM PDT by jiggyboy (Ten per cent of poll respondents are either lying or insane)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MikeA
so basically this means that France as agreed to loan Israel a Big white flag... they just need the US to deliver it
8 posted on 08/02/2006 2:09:57 PM PDT by gth833s
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Republicain

Excellent. At this rate Israel will be in control of Damascus by the time a force is ready to move in to S. Lebanon.


9 posted on 08/02/2006 2:10:20 PM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Republicain
Out of all this call for cease fire these negotiators seem to have forgotten one point, Israel and Hezbos have to agree to it.
10 posted on 08/02/2006 2:10:40 PM PDT by tobyhill (The War on Terrorism is not for the weak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MikeA
Nay....we'll call for a cease-fire when Israel gives us the nod...and only then...Bush is all for what's taking place in southern Lebanon...
11 posted on 08/02/2006 2:14:15 PM PDT by shield (A wise man's heart is at his RIGHT hand; but a fool's heart at his LEFT. Ecc. 10:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Republicain

"France holds a key role in the negotiations because it is expected to provide the bulk of an international military force to be deployed in southern Lebanon as part of a deal to end three weeks of deadly fighting between Israel and the Lebanese Islamic militia Hezbollah."

Huh? The same France that just a few days ago said the Iranian government were a bunch of great guys? They're gonna be the ones to hold back Iranian backed Hezbollah?

France/Hezbollah will make UN/Hezbollah look like mortal enemies.


12 posted on 08/02/2006 2:15:33 PM PDT by Sax (You Done Tore Out My Heart And Stomped That Sucker Flat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shield

The only reason France et al are screaming for a cease fire is because they are afraid Israel is winning and will turn East and kick the sheet our Syria and maybe even Iran.

Do you think for a minute that they'd be asking for a cease fire if Israel was getting whupped?

Also, funny when Hizbollah seemed to be putting up a good fight, these Arab countries started showing their support.

They all know now Hizbollah is on the ropes and they're keeping their mouths shut..


13 posted on 08/02/2006 2:18:03 PM PDT by nikos1121 (Thank you again Jimmy Carter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Republicain
The article is by the AFP. Consider the source.

Sounds to me like the US hasn't budged.

14 posted on 08/02/2006 2:21:35 PM PDT by untrained skeptic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Republicain

Here is what I would put in as the requirments for a ceasefire:

1. All traces of Hezbolla must be eliminated from the face of the earth.

2. Lebanon must actively begin rounding up and eradicating terrorists - regardless of their membership (Hezbolla, Hamas, PA, Al-Q, etc.).

3. All weapons traffice between Syria and Lebanon must end.

4. 100K French and German troops must be on-ground to patrol the border between Lebanon and Israel (I figure 100K FAG [French And German] equal about 100 US troops....). Any further terrorist activity originating from Lebanon is now on the backs of the FAG troops - and those respective governments will be held accountable.


15 posted on 08/02/2006 3:34:35 PM PDT by TheBattman (Islam (and liberalism)- the cult of a Cancer on Society)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: untrained skeptic
Ah hell, this article is nothing more that CYOA Dipolspeak..

The U.N. can talk about the conditions of a "ceasefire" for WEEKS - and then have it refused by one member or another...

This "show" of trying to secure a ceasefire - is just that, a show.
The U.S. can show it's trying -- without success - and the Real Jews can go on killing Hizbollah and any or all that support them....
Perhaps the Real Jews will even be successful in suckering Syria into the fight - and then we can really fumigate the neighborhood and kill all the cockroaches.

Semper Fi
16 posted on 08/02/2006 4:44:47 PM PDT by river rat (You may turn the other cheek, but I prefer to look into my enemy's vacant dead eyes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: TheBattman
You need to add:

5. The "FAG" troops monitor all land, sea and air traffic into the country to ensure the above.

6. Israelis or their designated representatives may search anywhere in Lebanon without advance notice, including the "FAG" troops.

7. Any "Lebanese" who protest the above will be promptly exiled to Syria.

8. Any violations of the above gives Israel the right to tell the "FAG" to bug out so they can come in and do whatever is needed themselves.

17 posted on 08/02/2006 5:49:55 PM PDT by JohnBovenmyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson