Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Where’s The Compassion for Mel Gibson?
BOND Brotherhood Organization of a New Destiny ^ | 08/02/06 | Rev. Jesse Lee Peterson

Posted on 08/02/2006 10:00:34 AM PDT by abigail2

August 2, 2006

Contact: Ermias Alemayehu (323) 782-1980 / (213) 804-1872

Where’s The Compassion for Mel Gibson?

LOS ANGELES- Since Mel Gibson’s arrest for suspicion of drunk driving last week, liberal Jewish leaders and most of the media have condemned him for uttering anti-Jewish slurs. On two occasions Gibson has since offered apologies and asked forgiveness from the Jewish community—but some in the media are still not satisfied. Rev. Jesse Lee Peterson, Founder and President of BOND (Brotherhood Organization of a New Destiny) issued a statement today calling for Gibson’s detractors to “have compassion” for the star. Below is Rev. Peterson’s statement in its entirety regarding this issue:

“I am sorry that Mel Gibson and his family are going through this difficult period. Gibson absolutely did the right thing by offering a heartfelt apology and asking for forgiveness from the Jewish community—he’s even asked to meet with Jewish leaders. To those who will not be satisfied until Gibson is destroyed—I say ‘shame on you. Where’s your humanity?’

“Now there appears to be an orchestrated campaign by some Hollywood insiders and media to personally destroy Gibson. These same people opposed Gibson’s blockbuster ‘The Passion of the Christ’ which despite opposition from liberals was a huge hit among audiences. These ‘smear merchants’ are using this incident to get back at Gibson. It’s time that people accept his apology and move on.

“Had this been a liberal struggling with a similar addiction—these same people would be calling for understanding—so where’s the compassion for Mel Gibson? Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson, and Louis Farrakhan have all made anti-Jewish remarks in the past with little public condemnation. But God help you if you make a highly successful movie about Jesus Christ and then succumb to alcoholism. This is another example of selective outrage practiced by liberal hypocrites. So much for liberal compassion.”

BOND (Brotherhood Organization of a New Destiny) is a nationally recognized nonprofit organization whose mission is “rebuilding the family by rebuilding the man.” Rev. Peterson is the author of SCAM: How the Black Leadership Exploits Black America. For more information visit BOND

You are receiving this communication because you asked to receive information via email from BOND. If you have received this email in error or would like to be removed from the email list, please send an email to frontdesk@bondinfo.org


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: antisemitism; drunkenfool; jessepeterson; jews; melgibson
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 181-194 next last
To: Responsibility2nd
I like Rev. Jesse Lee, I really do. But what if Mel had drunkenly spouted hate speech against Blacks? I wonder if Peterson would have been so forgiving.

==============================================

Based on JLP's own writing (we all know that most Blacks are lazy and immoral - Sept. 2005) I would say that he would agree.

101 posted on 08/02/2006 2:06:28 PM PDT by wtc911 (You can't get there from here)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: XJarhead
I've been drunk more than once, and I never went off about jews or any other ethnic group. I might have said an unkind word or two about an ex-girlfriend or something, and perhaps said much worse than I actually believed. But there always was a kernel of truth that the booze needs to start the ball rolling.

Getting drunk now and then, even falling down drunk, is NOT the same as being an alcoholic. Two completely different animals. And by alcholoic I mean someone who starts their day with a morning screwdriver or two, and moves on from there, from lunch to dinner and up til bed time.

And I can tell you from personal experience that vodka does smell. And I can also tell you that the difference between when an alcoholic is sober and when they are not is like night and day - Jekle and Hyde. It is THAT dramatic a difference. Add into that whatever depression the person is feeling.... well ...

It's an ugly picture - damn ugly!

Getting drunk and being a drunk - not the same at all.

102 posted on 08/02/2006 2:11:20 PM PDT by AFreeBird (... Burn the land and boil the sea's, but you can't take the skies from me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Kermit the Frog Does theWatusi; abigail2
I mean, it's not like he left a girl to drown in the back seat of his car or anything...


103 posted on 08/02/2006 2:11:51 PM PDT by HowlinglyMind-BendingAbsurdity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: D-Chivas
In an interview with Reader's Digest, Braveheart star Mel said he would not hear any criticism of his father.

Is it the 4th Commandment that requires us to honor our father and our mother?

What would you have a son do who loves his father even though the father is a flawed human being like the rest of us?

104 posted on 08/02/2006 2:13:50 PM PDT by Wolfstar (Where you go with me, heaven will always be.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Wolfstar

Exactly.

And what does it matter whether his father is a communist, a Nazi, or a Quaker?

Good grief, if someone attacked my parents, on national TV, the last thing I would do is agree with them. No matter what I thought of the privately.


105 posted on 08/02/2006 2:24:56 PM PDT by rcocean (Copyright is theft and loved by Hollywood socialists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: abigail2

This was a wake-up call to Mel to stop drinking before he kills himself or another driver.

106 posted on 08/02/2006 2:27:15 PM PDT by Dr. Scarpetta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Just mythoughts

Yea, Cindy Sheehan said the same thing and went into detail about it talking about Neo-Cons and PNAC. There is always a double standard against the right. Rhandi Rhodes statements make Ann Coulter's look tame but she gets a radio show on a a left wing network.


107 posted on 08/02/2006 2:27:57 PM PDT by John Lenin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: John Lenin
These trash making perverts in Hollywood know darn well what sells more, al la Mel's movie, did they take the lead to make more profits, ha, not they tried to CENSOR and trash multiple of millions of Christians.

(Oh and I know full well that Mel IS NOT a conservative, that is not a "grace" over these that tried to blacken the eye of Christianity.)
108 posted on 08/02/2006 2:32:43 PM PDT by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: Jedi Master Pikachu
strong mild antisemitic streak. The guy was DRUNK

Okay, I don't know exactly how strong or mild Mel Gibson's anti-semitism is. Certainly it exists, and it's not pretty. The fact that he was drunk could have diminished his inhibitions so as to cause him to reveal his true inner feelings, or else it could have led him to make exaggerated statements in a deliberate attempt to shock and outrage his listeners, or perhaps it was some combination of both.

Different people react in different ways to alchohol. I've never been drunk myself, so I can't offer any first-hand experience. But it's impossible to believe there wasn't at least a kernel of anti-semitism for Gibson to even think of making those comments about Jews.

Mel has the right to think what he thinks, and the First Amendment allows him to say what he said. He's not going to be placed in a politically-correct indoctrination camp to re-mold his opinions. But other people also have a right to evaluate him by his statements and alter their opinions of his character.

I personally hope this will be a wake-up call for Mel. Driving drunk at high speeds and getting arrested and facing a barrage of criticism for his anti-semitic tirade might just cause him to re-evaluate the direction his life is going. His apology is a good first step. I hope it's a sincere one, and that he will decide to make changes in his life. If he truly does so, he should eventually be able to rehabilitate his reputation.

109 posted on 08/02/2006 2:33:27 PM PDT by dpwiener
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: XJarhead
Be caareful, I made the exact same arguments on another thread yestrday and was dogpiled on by those who accused me of being holier-than-thou, etc...

I just don't get the ease at which some just write off these statements as "the booze talking", and not a glimpse into his soul.

You'll probably even get the alcoholic "Jekyl and Hyde" argument. Funny thing is is that the whole point of that story was the concoction was simply briging out the dark side of what is already in us...

110 posted on 08/02/2006 2:38:27 PM PDT by cspackler (There are 10 kinds of people in this world, those who understand binary and those who don't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: skeeter
Maybe you could start by telling us if you've ever driven while over the legal limit?

Yes I have. But I have never driven drunk. I hope you can realize the severity of the difference. I have known too many people injured from drunk drivers to take this any less seriously.

Any criticism directed at Gibson should also be directed at anyone who's done anything similar, and with the same intensity.

I don't think I've ever given anyone a pass on something like this.
111 posted on 08/02/2006 2:45:47 PM PDT by Stone Mountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: cspackler
Too late, he just got the argument from me, and although I don't recall responding to you directly on the other thread(s), I think I did agree with someone who did.

I've been touched by alchoholism in a very personal way. I saw it, and was affected by it everyday for more years than I care to remember.

And I saw how, when on the sauce, a normally very caring and loving person, could turn on, and be mean and downright cruel, to the people that person loved.

So its not a stretch for me to beleive that a group of people, not related in any way to Mel, for whom he may may may not have any personal feelings for, could come under fire from him while the monkey was riding his back.

You folks need to under understand that long time alchoholics brain chemistry has been severely altered. It NOT THE SAME as getting drunk once in a while.

112 posted on 08/02/2006 2:47:54 PM PDT by AFreeBird (... Burn the land and boil the sea's, but you can't take the skies from me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: John Lenin
Hehe, it's ok to crucify Mel about a stupid movie but if Mel says one bad thing about Jews he needs to be crucified.

Not sure why this was directed at me - I supported the making of The Passion. And while the anti-semitic comments he made were disgusting, so was calling an officer "Sugartits" and so was the fact that he was driving drunk.
113 posted on 08/02/2006 2:48:20 PM PDT by Stone Mountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff
What apology?

From Clinton's apology, December 11, 1998:

What I want the American people to know, what I want the Congress to know is that I am profoundly sorry for all I have done wrong in words and deeds. I never should have misled the country, the Congress, my friends or my family. Quite simply, I gave into my shame.

That apology good enough for you? Is all forgiven now?

114 posted on 08/02/2006 2:52:16 PM PDT by Stone Mountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: John Lenin
The issue isn't Mel driving drunk it's what he said to the cop.

I disagree. Both are the issue. Also, what he said to the policewoman. But out of those three, I consider drunk driving to be the most serious.

But he didn't ram his car into anything nor did he kill anyone.

Is that what you say when anyone else is arrested for drunk driving? I happen to think it's much more serious than that.
115 posted on 08/02/2006 2:55:43 PM PDT by Stone Mountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Stone Mountain

.12 is three drinks. That is not blind drunk.


116 posted on 08/02/2006 2:59:14 PM PDT by John Lenin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: El Cid

I'm assuming, truth serum that booze is, that no one on a drunken toot ever told another that they "loved them' when all they really wanted was the proverbial roll in the hay. When drunk we ONLY speak the truth ;)


117 posted on 08/02/2006 3:00:31 PM PDT by EDINVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: abigail2
It's the selfish, jealous haters of all that's good that love this.

---------------------------------------------

And those who can insert themselves into it for the purpose of getting a little media attention.

118 posted on 08/02/2006 3:02:37 PM PDT by wtc911 (You can't get there from here)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stone Mountain
Oddly enough, in a lot of cases, the alcoholic can drive and function in other areas of society fairly well while drunk. Better than someone who just got drunk one night. I'm not excusing the practice, and over the years that functionality will fade, but you'd be surprised.

You can google "functioning alcoholic" for more info.

119 posted on 08/02/2006 3:06:22 PM PDT by AFreeBird (... Burn the land and boil the sea's, but you can't take the skies from me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff
That's fine, but once again, it wasn't "The" Jews, Jews, most Jews, or "the Jewish people" that were criticizing the movie. The most you can say is that some Jews criticized the movie. As did some members of other faiths, I might add.

In case you didn't realize, I was responding originally to this statement which I have a big problem with:

Sure he has issues with Jews, think of what he had to go through to make The Passion.

Why should he have issues with "Jews?" Again, I believe this is the soul of bigotry. Some Jews slurred The Passion. The vast majority didn't - in face, the vast majority of Jews didn't care at all. But apparently, he has issues with "Jews" which would imply all Jews to me. So again, why is it that Gibson has issues with Jews?

120 posted on 08/02/2006 3:09:34 PM PDT by Stone Mountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 181-194 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson