Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Frist: Europe Missile-Defense Site Needed
Voter's Domain ^ | June 30, 2006

Posted on 07/05/2006 12:17:40 PM PDT by foxy_maiden

In a letter to the president, Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist (R-TN) urged Bush on Friday to intensify efforts to put interceptor missiles at a Europe site. ...

(Excerpt) Read more at votersdomain.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 109th; billfrist; europe; frist; geopolitics; iran; missiledefense; politics
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

1 posted on 07/05/2006 12:17:42 PM PDT by foxy_maiden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: foxy_maiden

And Europe will be charged how much for this service?? Why do we need to continue to pay for Europe's defense?? Let them develop their own missile shield.


2 posted on 07/05/2006 12:19:38 PM PDT by MikeA (Not voting in November because you're pouting is a vote for Nancy Pelosi for Speaker of the House)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MikeA

Indeed. If they want a missile sheld, let them ask for it and pay for it. If it is needed to protect our troops in Europe ... let's get cracking on that exit strategy for WWII.


3 posted on 07/05/2006 12:21:45 PM PDT by NonValueAdded ("I'm all in favor of a dignified retirement: Why not try it on Kerry as a pilot program?" M. Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NonValueAdded; MikeA

Now if it were to be based in Poland, like the extended version of the article alluded to, or all intercepts were designed to happen over Berlin and Paris, maybe it would be worthwile to put the missiles in Europe instead of the East Coast.


4 posted on 07/05/2006 12:27:33 PM PDT by steveegg (It's time once again to keep this lifeforce running - https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: foxy_maiden

Let's face it, this shield is not going to be much use against Russia. It's only real use to Europe would be vis a vis Iran, or maybe Pakistan.


5 posted on 07/05/2006 12:28:10 PM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NonValueAdded

LOL, I like the comment about an exit strategy from WW2. Missile shield for US bases in Europe for sure. Missile shields for the rest of Europe at cost plus a standard 33% mark-up.


6 posted on 07/05/2006 12:28:13 PM PDT by MikeA (Not voting in November because you're pouting is a vote for Nancy Pelosi for Speaker of the House)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MikeA

When I read it I don't see that it is for Europe's defence, rather than a more strategic place for us to shoot down a weapon.


7 posted on 07/05/2006 12:30:19 PM PDT by RDTF ("We love death. The US loves life. That is the big difference between us two.” Osama Bin laden)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: foxy_maiden

If Europe is interested in paying for these sites, fine. But for free? No way.


8 posted on 07/05/2006 12:30:27 PM PDT by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RDTF

That is correct. The Alaska site would have a limited radius of action and the European site would cover some of the other routes between Asia and America. A site in Cuba would nearly complete the circle.


9 posted on 07/05/2006 12:34:51 PM PDT by RightWhale (Off touch and out of base)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: foxy_maiden

excuse me but I see no reason to put up a missile shield for EU... they're all a bunch of ingrate dollar sucking bastards who's only reason to exist is to critisize America, EU UN same crowd... we should be building a 50 ft. wall on our south border, which is the more pressing issue atm, not caring for the bastards across the pond.


10 posted on 07/05/2006 12:38:35 PM PDT by Cinnamon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: foxy_maiden

Why piss more of my taxpayers money away?


11 posted on 07/05/2006 12:40:40 PM PDT by taxed2death (A few billion here, a few trillion there...we're all friends right?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: foxy_maiden

Frist is an idiot... Why should we spend American taxpayer dollars on a European defense system?? Shouldn't they make/fund their own?


12 posted on 07/05/2006 12:43:44 PM PDT by Element187
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: foxy_maiden

Europe? How about near N. Korea?


13 posted on 07/05/2006 12:52:52 PM PDT by Mr. Brightside
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: foxy_maiden

Well that'll sure make the euro-weenies wet themselves.


14 posted on 07/05/2006 12:53:58 PM PDT by ElkGroveDan (California bashers will be called out)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Element187
Frist is an idiot... Why should we spend American taxpayer dollars on a European defense system?? Shouldn't they make/fund their own?

Sigh. This isn't to protect Europe. This is to protect the U.S.
15 posted on 07/05/2006 1:05:10 PM PDT by drjimmy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: foxy_maiden
If any FReeper has access to LexusNexus, now would be an excellent time to revisit some of the reasons the left lectured us all on for why exactly it would be a bad idea to work on an Anti-Ballistic Missile system.
16 posted on 07/05/2006 1:05:21 PM PDT by theBuckwheat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: foxy_maiden

How about we enlarge the sites in Alaska and California and put one in the south to perhaps deal with Chavez in the future.


17 posted on 07/05/2006 1:07:05 PM PDT by jbwbubba
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: foxy_maiden
If it would benefit the US to have a shield in Europe by improving our ability to intercept missiles inbound to the US then I'm for it.

If it is for the benefit of Europe then let Europe formally ask the US for such a shield and let them propose a formal plan that would address location, cost, political fallout, etc. In other words, it would be a service we would be willing to provide given they pay for such a service. Our NATO allies didn't have our back against the regime in Iraq so why should we have their back against the regime in Iran? They must realize that everything comes at a cost, including the protection we are willing to provide as an ally.

Of course France is excluded from having the right to any protection we might be able to provide as they are not an ally in any sense. Besides, France will be imploding any day now and no one will want to waste a good missile on them anyway.
18 posted on 07/05/2006 1:08:56 PM PDT by RedWhiteAndBlueBlood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RDTF

From where? Iran's missiles can't reach the US and I'm not sure we need to be all geared up for a nuclear confrontation with Russia. Either way, it's a dumb idea. If we're going to invest in a missile shield it needs to be over the US West Coast in case the Mental Case Midget, aka Mental Midget, in North Korea manages to get his missiles to fly.


19 posted on 07/05/2006 1:23:12 PM PDT by MikeA (Not voting in November because you're pouting is a vote for Nancy Pelosi for Speaker of the House)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: RedWhiteAndBlueBlood

yeah.. I do agree with what you've said.. If it's for our country's best interest, then we have to support it; but, if it's for Europe, then negotiations must be done accordingly so that our country's efforts will be rewarded.


20 posted on 07/05/2006 1:25:27 PM PDT by foxy_maiden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson