Skip to comments.
NK Fires Missile (short-range; now a second short-range missile)
July 4, 2006
Posted on 07/04/2006 1:02:47 PM PDT by Lunatic Fringe
TOKYO (AP) Japanese broadcaster NHK says North Korea has test-launched a missile.
TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; US: Colorado; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: clintonlegacy; dprk; johnkerry; lurch; missile; missiletest; norad; northcom; northkorea; proliferation; pruneface; taepodong2; wendysherman
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160, 161-180, 181-200 ... 1,221-1,228 next last
To: theophilusscribe
Fox News reports that the US Northern Command (Northcom) in Colorado was placed on high alert. The status is said to be due to North Koreas plans to launch a long-range ballistic missile. I guess this explains the news from yesterday, that Cheyenne Mountain raised its security status to "Bravo-plus." Looks like we've been watching Li'l Kim's missile prep the whole time....
161
posted on
07/04/2006 1:40:30 PM PDT
by
r9etb
To: theophilusscribe
I believe the Mountain was a Bravo Plus which is two full rungs from "war", Third and a half of five.
162
posted on
07/04/2006 1:40:32 PM PDT
by
mad_as_he$$
(Never corner anything meaner than you. NSDQ)
To: Brytani
" ... ones our wonderful previous administration signed with them."
It lasted as long as it took for Madeleine Albright to drink her glass of champagne.
163
posted on
07/04/2006 1:40:34 PM PDT
by
marajade
(Yes, I'm a SW freak!)
To: AmericanInTokyo
I agree it was missle envy...
164
posted on
07/04/2006 1:40:41 PM PDT
by
antivenom
(If you're not living on the edge, you're taking up too much damn space!)
To: don-o
How's this, maybe Japan and China should get off their rear ends and do something to protect their area of the world, considering they are at most risk of NK's decision to test missiles?
165
posted on
07/04/2006 1:40:45 PM PDT
by
Brytani
(Someone stole my tagline - reward for its return!!!)
To: Brytani
I have no issue with hitting first, if its warranted. But you've got to hit them hard - not just taking out this missile launcher, we'd have to use tactical nukes to destroy all their military assets along the border.
To: devane617
They want us to show our "defense" hand. They are hoping to fire a few duds thinking we will show our ability to intercept. They ain't fools. Time to see who is the best poker player. Yep, it's looking that way. I suspect they never fueled the big missile and this was all just a (failed) trick to get us to use our defenses. They have failed to make us jump the gun.
To: AmericanInTokyo
I have it on. Not much useful info.
To: Cringing Negativism Network
"They (NK) need our help, we should negotiate with them, exercise diploooooomacy with them...(BOOM)
169
posted on
07/04/2006 1:41:15 PM PDT
by
GRRRRR
(WHERE is the next Ronald Reagan? Virginia?)
To: NonValueAdded
Imagine if GWB sent a diplomatic note to NK acknowledging the fireworks salute to America's 230th birthday with thanks from the American people?LOL God bless Americans!! Only an American mind could come up with that scenario. And only would an American President such as we have now consider doing it. But alas, State panties would be in a collective wad.
170
posted on
07/04/2006 1:41:36 PM PDT
by
daybreakcoming
(If destruction be our lot, we must ourselves be its author and finisher. A. Lincoln)
To: oceanview
How long have we been on the DMZ now? 50 years?
171
posted on
07/04/2006 1:41:52 PM PDT
by
Brytani
(Someone stole my tagline - reward for its return!!!)
To: antivenom
?
Discovery went to the space station. It certainly wasn't a primary national security mission (although there might be something else we don't / shouldn't know about - wait for tomorrow's NYT). As for launching in a hurricane, that sure wasn't the case on Sunday. Let's not get too dramatic here.
172
posted on
07/04/2006 1:42:28 PM PDT
by
NonValueAdded
("I'm all in favor of a dignified retirement: Why not try it on Kerry as a pilot program?" M. Steyn)
To: Brytani
Another thread was up anout NK failing to return empty trains back to China after goods were delivered.
173
posted on
07/04/2006 1:42:54 PM PDT
by
don-o
(Don't be a Freeploader. Do the Right thing. Be a monthly donor. Pretty please.)
Comment #174 Removed by Moderator
To: daybreakcoming
175
posted on
07/04/2006 1:43:22 PM PDT
by
cmsgop
( DO NOT VOTE FOR PEDRO !!! He's a DEMOCRAT......)
To: demlosers
NK timed this missile launch to coincide with the shuttle launch. No threat to the shuttle, but it was meant to steal the thunder of the US's 4th of July shuttle launch in the media.
To: Lunatic Fringe
Not very impressive, actually. I'll be watching better stuff than that tonight over the lake. It is good to see that they've succeeded in hitting the ocean.
This is a "bribe me or else" move.
To: Brytani
yes, 50 years. its a token force from military perspective,with respect to a conventional exchange. NK has lots of ground troops, artillery, etc. and Seoul isn't that far away.
CNN - third missile lauched. they say its the long range one, but that is not confirmed.
now, a problem with the launch?
what is going on.
To: marajade
If it had been up to our previous administration, Al Quada would have been armed, Iran given yellow cake, NK allowed to come into our nuke stockpiles for a 1/2 off sale and Yassar Arafat given a state funeral.
We're now dealing with the ramifications of our previous administrations appeasement foreign policy.
179
posted on
07/04/2006 1:43:51 PM PDT
by
Brytani
(Someone stole my tagline - reward for its return!!!)
To: antivenom
Did anybody tell the German on board? Or for that matter our intelligence orgs that there was a German on board?
180
posted on
07/04/2006 1:43:56 PM PDT
by
mad_as_he$$
(Never corner anything meaner than you. NSDQ)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160, 161-180, 181-200 ... 1,221-1,228 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson