Posted on 06/24/2006 3:24:43 PM PDT by just truth please
To the Lawyers in Free Republic land: How would a Citizens Action Group go about filing a lawsuit against the NY Times for their, seemingly, illegal release of classified Government information? It seems obvious the US Attorney General is not going to. Someone, some how needs to get this moving. Free Republic might be a good starting point.
from another thread: " ......then his Administration must not let the Times continue to disregard the law. Congress passed the Espionage Act of 1917 specifically to punish the kind of subversive acts in which the Times engaged by exposing the wiretapping and SWIFT programs."
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1655044/posts?page=74#74
Add a 4th. Try Marxists! Maybe a 5th, destroy Democracy.
Nam Vet
Sure looks like Kerr McGee's stock price to me.
Perhaps you meant this one:
http://www.corporate-ir.net/ireye/ir_site.zhtml?ticker=NYT&script=300&layout=-6
They have been in a downward trend for 4 years now.
Jay Rockefeller
Jay Rockefeller
Jay Rockefeller
Woops..Egg on my face.
That's the graph that came up when I did NYT....
Thanks for the correction.
Jay Rockefeller
Jay Rockefeller
I've been thinking about a lawsuit against the Slimes and just how the h3ll it could be done by ordinary citizens. The only thing I can think of is suing them for UNDULY or negligently subjecting me and my family to physical harm or death.
Nam Vet
*Americans from all corners (ala the "vast "Right-Wing Conspiracy" ;)
unified to form a massive tidal wave in Class Action suits against the ACLU and the NY Times, as well as J. Rochefeller, et al, would guarantee the extinction of these subversive entitites - toot sweet.
"I count three (if not more). Secret Prisons..NSA...and now the newest one detailing our sources and methods of tracking terrorist money all over the world!"
Is the government/administration mandated to provide vital national security and critical classfied information to the MEDIA - the FIFTH COLUMN? Is the present administration so intimidated by the self-serving MEDIA which assert the "most secret..."???
"I count three (if not more). Secret Prisons..NSA...and now the newest one detailing our sources and methods of tracking terrorist money all over the world!"
Is the government/administration mandated to provide vital national security and critical classfied information to the MEDIA - the FIFTH COLUMN? Is the present administration so intimidated by the self-serving MEDIA which assert the "most secret..."???
It is up to the DOJ to investigate and prosecute these leaks..which are coming from Clinton holdovers in the CIA & NSA and probably Senotor Rockefeller and other Democrat Senators.
Back in the early 80s I worked for Lockheed on the F-117 production program. This was long before the F-117 was ever disclosed to the American people. I held a DoD Secret Security Clearance and we we're firmly warned that if we ever talked about our work outside of the plant(even to family members), made sketches, accidently exited the plant with documents or blueprints, that we could expect a quick visit by the FBI. I remember how impressed I was with our great nation that we could keep Secret projects under wraps. And now the NY Times can take similar Secret National Security programs and disclose them to the entire world with what seems to be complete immunity. It's time that our Govt. take a stand and go after the NY Times and their treason and arrogance. The NY Times has no concern for national security. I know that their are times when our national security trumps the public's right to know. Publications like the NY Times make me feel less safe and they need to be held accountable.
1. Because they uncovered government abuses in the program;
2. Because the program is unconstitutional;
3. Because they could?
I have not seen any evidence of #1.
#2 could not be any more incorrect. There is a Supreme Court ruling that states this action is expressly allowed under the constitution. In response to that ruling, Congress specified the procedure for obtaining warrants and that procedure was followed exactly. The law is overwhelimgly on the side of the administration here.
Well then, who are we to require laws be followed if they talked it over with the WH. (/sarc)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.