Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ann Coulter Banned in New Jersey?
News mac | 6/10/06

Posted on 06/11/2006 9:24:07 AM PDT by hope

Reprinted from NewsMax.com

Saturday, June 10, 2006 11:50 p.m. EDT

Ann Coulter Banned in New Jersey?

Two New Jersey Democrats are pushing to have Ann Coulter's new book "Godless: The Church of Liberalism," banned from all bookstores in their state because she criticized four 9/11 widows known as "the Jersey Girls."

In a joint press release issued Friday, New Jersey Assemblywomen Joan Quigley and Linda Stender say they want New Jersey retailers to "ban the sale of [Coulter's] book throughout the state."

"Ann Coulter's criticism of 9-11 widows, whose only desire since the attacks have been to repair their shattered lives and protect other families from the horrors they have experienced, is motivated purely by petty greed and hate," the two Democrats complained.

"Coulter's vicious characterizations and remarks are motivated by greed and her desire to sell books . . . She is a leech trying to turn a profit off perverting the suffering of others."

Quigley and Stender conclude:

"No one in New Jersey should buy this book and allow Ann Coulter to profit from her hate-mongering. We are asking New Jersey retailers statewide to stand with us and express their outrage by refusing to carry or sell copies of Coulter's book. Her hate-filled attacks on our 9-11 widows has no place on New Jersey bookshelves."

Get Ann Coulter's new book "Godless: The Church of Liberalism," before Democrats ban it in your state. Click Here.

Editor's note:
Own a piece of authentic Ronald Reagan history – Click Here now!
Wear the USS George Bush fleece jacket – Click Here Now for FREE offer!

Da Vinci Con Exposed - Ann Coulter`s Book FREE - Click Here!

Read more on this subject in related Hot Topics:

9/11 Commission
DNC

108-108-103


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; Political Humor/Cartoons; US: New Jersey
KEYWORDS: anncoulter; tolerantleft
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 361-362 next last
To: FreeReign
"Government officials have not been delegated the "power to punish private citizens who don't do what they are asked"."

I would point to the DOJ lawsuits against Microsoft when Bill Gates wouldn't donate money to the Democrats. I would point to the IRS audits of Bill O'Reilly and The Heritage Foundation. Power to abuse citizens isn't "delegated," but the power to direct Government agencies to harass and abuse citizens is used nevertheless. But you know that and you can't possibly believe otherwise. And that is why Government Officials should not be "asking" "private citizens," or "retailers" to "ban" things that are Constitutional, such as books, that those same officials find offensive. Would you state that these elected officials would be within of their Constitutional rights to start "asking" "private citizens" or "retailers" to "ban" sales of the Bible?

221 posted on 06/11/2006 11:49:51 AM PDT by Enterprise (Let's not enforce laws that are already on the books, let's just write new laws we won't enforce.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies]

To: jude24

The embarrassment goes to the one that needs it to be explained. Or they can buy the book and get the whole picture.


222 posted on 06/11/2006 11:51:03 AM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: DustyMoment

I wouldn't bother trying to get a copy of this book at you local tax funded library. Censured for sure.


223 posted on 06/11/2006 11:51:38 AM PDT by dblshot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]

To: Eagles Talon IV
Embarrassment? Those 4 women rode their husbands caskets to wealth and fame. They CAMPAIGNED for John Kerry. The b*tches are pure sleeze and Ann Coulter was DEAD on. These shmucks are no better then Cindy Sheehan.

And they and their liberal enablers got hit right between the eyes. Good shooting Annie.


224 posted on 06/11/2006 11:51:42 AM PDT by Donald Rumsfeld Fan ("fake but accurate": NY Times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: Sofa King
"In a way, it's even worse, since by not actually making it a matter of law, there is no legal recourse against it."

Liberals can always be counted on to suppress the free speech of anyone who opposes them, like any strutting Nazis.
Accompanied by screaming "1st amendment rights" the moment anyone even dares to challenge their Cindy Sheehan like loony left rantings.
225 posted on 06/11/2006 11:52:14 AM PDT by Jameison
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 217 | View Replies]

To: hope

Hmm, whatever happened to the First Amendment? Oh, that's only for liberal books and opinions. Ann must be doing a great job to get them this angry. Go girl!


226 posted on 06/11/2006 11:52:30 AM PDT by Marysecretary (Thank you, Lord, for FOUR MORE YEARS!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: papertyger

You're a great teacher - hopefully, your comment doesn't need to be explained - otherwise it will be an embarrassment! ;)


227 posted on 06/11/2006 11:54:04 AM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: jude24

"Coulter's statements go well beyond criticism."
Really? One man's criticm is another man's hate speech. And hate speech is still freespeech or Ward Churchill would have been summarily fired from his tax payer funded job.


228 posted on 06/11/2006 11:55:21 AM PDT by dblshot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies]

To: hope
"Two New Jersey Democrats are pushing to have Ann Coulter's new book "Godless: The Church of Liberalism," banned from all bookstores in their state because she criticized four 9/11 widows known as "the Jersey Girls."

Censorship of anything they don't like.

Just part of the Democratic Party SOP of thier Brave New World definition of "tolerance".

No news here.

229 posted on 06/11/2006 11:55:25 AM PDT by TheClintons-STILLAnti-American
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GRRRRR

What were the comments about stifling, censorship, and the "chill wind?"

If this is just a request not to carry the book, then this is typical liberal symbolism over substance.

If it's an actual book ban, then I have to turn my back on New Jersey, it has effectively seceeded from the Union and has joined San Francisco. BTW, I am originally from New Jersey.


230 posted on 06/11/2006 11:55:53 AM PDT by Fred Hayek (Liberalism is a mental disorder)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: FreeReign
"The First Amendment of the Constitutions leaves that right to everybody. Even harpie-rat Jersey politicians."

Constitution doesn't allow any of these though, and I'll cut and psate from post 221:


"I would point to the DOJ lawsuits against Microsoft when Bill Gates wouldn't donate money to the Democrats. I would point to the IRS audits of Bill O'Reilly and The Heritage Foundation. Power to abuse citizens isn't "delegated," but the power to direct Government agencies to harass and abuse citizens is used nevertheless. But you know that and you can't possibly believe otherwise. And that is why Government Officials should not be "asking" "private citizens," or "retailers" to "ban" things that are Constitutional, such as books, that those same officials find offensive. Would you state that these elected officials would be within of their Constitutional rights to start "asking" "private citizens" or "retailers" to "ban" sales of the Bible?"

That is exactly the direction the Joisey harpy politicians are heading.
231 posted on 06/11/2006 11:56:18 AM PDT by Jameison
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 219 | View Replies]

To: hope

I guess I'll have to buy "The book" to see how bad she damaged the nerves of the left. The more they "chastise" her, the larger her bankroll becomes from sales.


232 posted on 06/11/2006 11:57:59 AM PDT by Arrowhead1952 (Don't mess with Texas' Senators <"No amnesty! No how. No way." >)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jude24
"Coulter's statements go well beyond criticism"

You cannot be serious.
Where were these Josiey politician harpies when Ward Churchill made his "Little Eichmann" speech again?
233 posted on 06/11/2006 11:58:53 AM PDT by Jameison
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies]

To: jude24
Tasteless as Ms. Coulter's comments are,

Tasteless? I found them to be perfectely delicious. Sumptuous actually. Very satisfing. Burp!

234 posted on 06/11/2006 12:01:06 PM PDT by mc5cents
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: hope

Unlike the "Jersey Girls", I have actually survived a terror attack on the WTC, and I agree with Ann. They are craven self seeking vultures on the corpses of their dead relatives. Mourn all you want, just don't think your grief is sufficient reason to adjust the foreign policy of the US to your pleasure.


235 posted on 06/11/2006 12:06:11 PM PDT by thoughtomator (A thread without a comment on immigration is not complete)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fudd Fan
"Jersey" is a sweater, an island off Britain or a breed of cow.

In this case it is "a breed of cow"

236 posted on 06/11/2006 12:08:49 PM PDT by thoughtomator (A thread without a comment on immigration is not complete)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: hope
What's interesting is that Liberals aren't decrying the rest of what she said about them being godless.
I'm waiting for a Kerry or Kennedy to step up to defend their religion but they apparently don't know what to say.
Banning the book won't ban her message, it will just make people hungry for it.
237 posted on 06/11/2006 12:08:52 PM PDT by The Brush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sofa King
Great observation. It is a way of suppressing something without actually legislating against it. I wonder how many of the Congress people are still alive today to observe all the illustrated porn and violence available on the internet. You can suppress something for a while, but only for a while.
238 posted on 06/11/2006 12:12:05 PM PDT by Enterprise (Let's not enforce laws that are already on the books, let's just write new laws we won't enforce.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 217 | View Replies]

To: Enterprise
Government officials have not been delegated the power to punish private citizens who don't do what they are asked. Cite such delegated power.

I would point to the DOJ lawsuits against Microsoft when Bill Gates wouldn't donate money to the Democrats. I would point to the IRS audits of Bill O'Reilly and The Heritage Foundation.

I'm well aware of what you mention but I asked for delegated power.

Power to abuse citizens isn't "delegated," but the power to direct Government agencies to harass and abuse citizens is used nevertheless.

Such abuse of power is legally wrong. See the checks and balances of the Constitution. Abusive politicians can be voted out of office; Abusive politicians can be impeached; and abusive politicians can be prosecuted for breaking laws.

All of that being a perfect deterrent? Of course not.

Look. The Jersey girls are free to say the wrong things that they say; Ann Coulter is free to call the Jersey girls on it; Book store owners are free to sell or not sell Ann Coulters books and airhead Jersey pols are free to advocate boycotts.

That's the what the first Amendment means.

If we disagree, fine.

239 posted on 06/11/2006 12:12:23 PM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 221 | View Replies]

To: hope

I hope Ann occasionally reads FReeper posts. She deserves to know how much real people love her.

:-) I'd love to shake your hand, Ann. You're a brave, bright, beautiful lady.


240 posted on 06/11/2006 12:15:30 PM PDT by bannie (The government which robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend upon the support of Paul.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 361-362 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson