Posted on 05/31/2006 1:19:27 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
By Rebecca Morelle
Fifty-five million years ago the North Pole was an ice-free zone with tropical temperatures, according to research.
A sediment core excavated from 400m (1,300ft) below the seabed of the Arctic Ocean has enabled scientists to delve far back into the region's past. An international team has been able to pin-point the changes that occurred as the Arctic transformed from green house to ice house. The findings are revealed in a trio of papers published in the journal Nature. Unlocked secrets Until now, our understanding of the Arctic's environmental history has been limited because of the difficulties in retrieving material from the harsh, ice-covered region. But in 2004, the Arctic Coring Expedition (Acex) used ice-breaking ships and a floating drilling rig to remove 400m-long cylinders of sediment from the bottom of the ocean floor. The cores were taken from the 1,500km (930 mile) long Lomonosov Ridge, which stretches between Siberia and Greenland.
The core holds layer upon layer of compressed fossils and minerals, which when studied can tell the story of millions of years of the Arctic's history.
The bottom end of the cylinder helped scientists to uncover what had happened to the Arctic during a dramatic global event known as the Palaeocene/Eocene Thermal Maximum, which occurred about 55 million years ago. "This time period is associated with a very enhanced green house effect," explained Appy Sluijs, a palaeoecologist from Utrecht University in the Netherlands, and the lead author on one of the papers. "Basically, it looks like the Earth released a gigantic fart of green house gases into the atmosphere - and globally the Earth warmed by about 5C (41F). "This event is already widely studied over the whole planet - but the one big exception was the Arctic Ocean." The core revealed that before 55 million years ago, the surface waters of the Arctic Ocean were ice-free and as warm as 18C (64F). But the sudden increase in greenhouse gasses boosted them to a balmy 24C (74F) and the waters suddenly filled with a tropical algae Apectodinium. When current climate models were applied to this period of the Earth's history, said Dr Sluijs, they predict North Pole temperatures to be about 15C (59F) lower than the core shows.
Blanket layers The second of the three papers, led by paleaoecologist Henk Brinkhuis, also from Utrecht University, reports that the Arctic Ocean underwent another transformation about 50 million years ago.
The water changed from salty to fresh, and the ocean became covered with a thick layer of freshwater fern, called Azolla. "We assume from climate models from the early Eocene Period that there was lots of fresh water coming into the basin via precipitation and giant Canadian and Siberian river run-offs," said Professor Brinkhuis. "And at a certain point this gave rise to this whopping great growth of Azolla."
He believes the prolific growth of this fern, may be linked to the later drops in temperature in the area.
"When you have so much of this plant in this giant sea, you have a mechanism to pump out carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. It is sort of an anti-green house effect," he said. "We argue that this sits right on the break from the really warm hot house period into the time when the ice house begins." Future predictions Further up the core, the first evidence of ice formation emerges.
"Five hundred thousand years above where the Azolla was found, we found the first drop stones," explained Professor Brinkhuis, who is also a co-author on the third paper which details Arctic ice-formation. "These are little stones that come from icebergs, icesheets or sea ice. So it must have been cold enough to have ice." "Before we did this it was thought that the ice field in the Northern hemisphere only began about three million years ago, but now we have pushed that back to 45 million years ago." Although the data tells us how the world changed from one with green house conditions to one with ice house conditions millions of years ago, it may also help scientists to predict what will result from the present changes in climate.
Appy Sluijs points out that the data reveals that some of the climate models used to detail the Arctic's history got things wrong, and as they are the same models that predict our future climate they may need adjusting. Kate Moran, lead author of one the papers and professor of oceanography and ocean engineering at University of Rhode Island, agrees: "We anticipate that our data will be used by climate modellers to give us better information about how climate change occurs and possibly where global climate might be leading. "Today's warming of the Arctic can, in all likelihood, be attributed to mankind's impact on the planet, but as our data suggest, natural processes operating in the past have also resulted in a significant warming and cooling of the Arctic."
|
Now this is special.....
With continental drift, where was this located 55 million years ago?
What natural processes? It's them dinosaurs in those gigantic SUVs! It's them that done it!
Mars
You have got to pay attention here to the multiple threads going on. Don't you recall we call came from Mars and destroyed this planet.
Looks like someone has poor math skills. Somebaody converted a differential to a temperature...oops. 5C is only 9F and 15C is only 27F.
Their C->F conversion is a bit flawed when they speak of rises and declines. Perhaps the author should attend some remedial math classes.
Looks like I got you by 24 sec...
Doh!
A good example of the global warming psychosis.
Thanks for adding that, had seen the error and was going to comment on it.
So much for the quality of the BBC Science Reporter.
globally the Earth warmed by about 5C (41F)
No, that is an increase of 9 degrees F, not 41F.
they predict North Pole temperatures to be about 15C (59F) lower than the core shows
Same kind of error. That should be a decrease of 27 degrees F, not 59F.
You would think a science writer (?) for the BBC might know the difference. Remember, a change of 5 degrees C corresponds to a 9 degree F change. She just looked up 5 and 15C on a conversion chart. Can't do that.
That would explain all the 'we are doomed!' predictions they keep producing...
My thoughts exactly. To heck with our own data, it's us darn humans causing the planet to warm.
Can we at least agrre that climate change is not new?
All it takes to do that is to be warm, conscious, past the 8th grade and have had some smattering of the sciences... biology, chemistry and physics.
Then we can concentrate on arguing why the current changes are any different or more signficant than the hundreds of previous ones.
Then there's the whole other subject: if man set out purposely to destroy the world, could he do it? My position is "no". But I'm open to discussion...
Right up there with:
Y2K
Alar
The Coming Ice Age
5 degrees warmer Celcius would still leave an ice cap on the North Pole.
And the location would always have been ocean yet they are recording fossils from a fresh-water plant.
This is getting sillier by the minute.
Becky must've missed most of high school math...
Sure, don't abandon the politically correct theory, even in the face of significant evidence in the article that global warming in the past has occurred without man-made emissions. This is a political hack masquerading as a science reporter.
natural processes operating in the past have also resulted in a significant warming and cooling of the Arctic....
ROFL ! it took ice cores for them to figure that out?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.