Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iranian drone plane buzzes U.S. aircraft carrier in Persian Gulf
rian ^ | 5/30/06 | na

Posted on 05/31/2006 4:19:10 AM PDT by Flavius

TEHRAN, May 30 (RIA Novosti) - A pilotless Iranian reconnaissance plane circled for 25 minutes over a U.S. aircraft carrier in the Persian Gulf before returning safely to its base, a senior Iranian official said Tuesday.

"Our pilotless reconnaissance plane flew over the USS Ronald Reagan in the Persian Gulf unnoticed to the Americans for 25 minutes," the official said, according to Iran's Fars agency.

He did not say when the flight took place, but added that U.S. radars picked up the unmanned aerial vehicle after 25 minutes, and that four USAF fighters and two helicopters were scrambled to intercept it. However, the Iranian plane had already crossed the border back into Iran and landed at its base.

"This points to holes in the U.S. military reconnaissance systems deployed in the Persian Gulf," the Iranian official said.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bs; iran; lyingragheads; russianews
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last
To: Flavius
What I find amusing is all the chest beating and saber rattling that Iran is doing. It's a psychological war they are trying to wage with us. I can't believe that every time their military manages to get to the latrine successfully they consider themselves militarily superior to the U.S. I'm not buying it a bit.
41 posted on 05/31/2006 5:29:10 AM PDT by LoudRepublicangirl (loudrepublicangirl)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flavius; Admin Moderator
Ahem. Mr. Moderator...

Apparently this story is a bit suspicious, per a prior edited thread?

42 posted on 05/31/2006 5:36:51 AM PDT by GreenAccord (Amnesty for speeders! Driving the speed Americans won't go.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flavius
Image Hosted by ImageShack.us
43 posted on 05/31/2006 5:42:06 AM PDT by mkjessup (The Shah doesn't look so bad now, eh? But nooo, Jimmah said the Ayatollah was a 'godly' man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tcostell
We defeated the Iraqi Army in less than 96 hours.

TWICE!

44 posted on 05/31/2006 5:46:32 AM PDT by CholeraJoe (Bayonet the wounded!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: saganite
"Why am I not believing this?"

- Well, I for one am not believing this because a "pilotless drone" takes a hell of a lot more technology to produce than Iran possesses. For starters, drones are guided from the ground by technicians who rely on military satellite GPS technology to steer the craft. For starters, Iran doesn't have any such satellites so once it was beyond visual range, the drone would wander off course.
Secondly, to get close to the USS Ronald Reagan a drone would have to employ stealth technology in it's design. Again, Iran doesn't have the slightest idea where to even start to produce such a craft.
If there's even a grain of truth to this story, Iran would have to have built a radio controlled drone and programmed it to fly a predetermined course, out and back. Any similarity between this flight path and the location of the USS Ronald Reagan would be purely coincidental.
45 posted on 05/31/2006 5:52:41 AM PDT by finnigan2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: jebeier

What the Navy needs is a quick-n-dirty response to this sort of thing. Once a drone like this has been detected (and it certainly was detected), it should be dispatched with a visually aimed heat-seeking MANPADS from one of the outlying ships or some such thing. That way we don't give away information, but we still assert our position.

Or having our boys follow the drone back to it's base and bomb it back to the stone ages. Seems like a reasonable response.


46 posted on 05/31/2006 5:53:36 AM PDT by newcthem (When are our congress-men going to start getting paid in Pesos?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy

Maybe it was a magic carpet over the carrier...


47 posted on 05/31/2006 5:54:07 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (BTUs are my Beat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Flavius

It's amazing to me how some on this board don't realize what enough money can buy. Iran has the money and there are plenty of sellers.


48 posted on 05/31/2006 5:55:16 AM PDT by wolfcreek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flavius
1975, USS Hancock was a transpac-in. Stopped in Hawaii, loaded up a couple of Marine helo squads. Flight deck was filled with choppers. Couldn't launch a fly if we wanted to.

3 maybe 4 time on the way to PI, Russian Bears came down to take a look. Flew circles and took pictures for a good 45 minutes each. So close we could wave, shoot the bird, shoot the moon at each other. Ruskies laughed and flew away.

Point is, recon flights are common. Unless you want to start something, you let them be. Just don't fire up any of your equipment, and they go away empty handed.

But you better believe the Reagan knew when that sucker took off, where it took off from, eta and etd of the whole "secret" Iranian mission.
49 posted on 05/31/2006 5:58:40 AM PDT by Al Gator (Refusing to "stoop to your enemy's level", gets you cut off at the knees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Ronald Reagan Carrier Strike Group Concludes Operations in Persian Gulf(May 29th)
50 posted on 05/31/2006 5:58:51 AM PDT by A.A. Cunningham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Solamente

*groan*


51 posted on 05/31/2006 6:02:41 AM PDT by null and void (The way to whip an enemy is to get 'em skeered, and then keep the skeer on 'em...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: theDentist
It was ignored for twenty minutes, then chased off.

Next time it won't be so lucky.


52 posted on 05/31/2006 6:10:07 AM PDT by usmcobra (A single rogue Marine, yeah that can happen, but a whole Unit, only a liberal would believe that BS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: finnigan2
For starters, Iran doesn't have any such satellites

OTOH they do have GPS receivers. I'm given to understand that the Tehran Radio Sheik® has them in stock.

Again, Iran doesn't have the slightest idea where to even start to produce such a craft.

There's stealth, and then there's stealth. A slow 6 ft wing span drone doesn't need the same level of stealth technology as a B1-B to have a small radar signal.

For starters, drones are guided from the ground

Ours are. Nothing says theirs need to be. A modified commercial aircraft has a wide visual range. (And for extra bonus points, given what the Vincences did, we are very reluctant to shoot at anything that looks like a commercial aircraft in that area).

53 posted on 05/31/2006 6:21:30 AM PDT by null and void (The way to whip an enemy is to get 'em skeered, and then keep the skeer on 'em...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Flavius
"This points to holes in the U.S. military reconnaissance systems deployed in the Persian Gulf,"....

Before the "War on Terror" can be taken seriously -- America will have to demonstrate what "holes" look like that once were cities.....

Militant Islam has been permitted to use THEIR weapons of choice ---- lunatics, while we have not delievered the level of destruction necessary to convince their population and "leaders" that was against us is suicidal...

Until we are ready to make war, real war --- this is all a stupid sham that will wear down the nation's will and determination to WIN....

Semper Fi

54 posted on 05/31/2006 6:23:58 AM PDT by river rat (You may turn the other cheek, but I prefer to look into my enemy's vacant dead eyes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #55 Removed by Moderator

To: Flavius

So THAT'S where Baghdad Bob disappeared to...


56 posted on 05/31/2006 6:26:45 AM PDT by IrishRainy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: finnigan2
Hummm, p'raps you're unaware that the Israelis developed the first practical "UAVs" during the 73 war? (When exactly did GPS go up?) True, they were little better that a closed circuit camera on a model airplane, but they were responsive to the local commander and showed him what was over the next ridge with minimal risk.

The US military proceeded to spend about a billion dollars and fifteen years or so proving what the Israelis had accomplished was impossible (Aquila et al).

Without more details or a US response, frankly, it is impossible to tell how much of this report is fiction and how much is fact.

57 posted on 05/31/2006 6:53:08 AM PDT by DK Zimmerman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: MikeWUSAF
Does this ship not have a Phalanx system or did they not want to waste the ammo on balsa wood drones?

They probably realized it was a kid's toy - and ignored it.

58 posted on 05/31/2006 7:05:55 AM PDT by GOPJ (Debate on a mandatory death penalty for pedophiles has started. Which side are you on?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: wolfcreek
It's amazing to me how some on this board don't realize what enough money can buy. Iran has the money and there are plenty of sellers.

Is that what Iran's up to in Germany?

59 posted on 05/31/2006 7:11:18 AM PDT by GOPJ (Debate on a mandatory death penalty for pedophiles has started. Which side are you on?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: DK Zimmerman

"True, they were little better that a closed circuit camera on a model airplane,"

- You are right. These short range "look over the next hill" craft are little more than line of sight radio controlled camera carriers. However, when you launch a drone over the horizon where the only ground reference for an on board camera is miles and miles of featureless ocean, you need a sophisticated GPS based guidance system.


60 posted on 05/31/2006 7:32:23 AM PDT by finnigan2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson