Posted on 05/21/2006 11:55:33 AM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist
"Your cynicism and callous disregard for the cruelty of abortion, and the destruction of embryos necessitated by artificial conception is evidence of the diminution of what makes human civilization human and civilized."
Huh? In reply to WHAT post of mine?
What a nefarious plot, to be sure! And then they have their "anchor babies" here!
Yeah but will everyone be required to take a DNA test before marriage? What if Joe and Susie's genetic offspring(the ones they donated-not siblings known to each other) get jiggy on Spring Break, and the girl finds herself pregnant? Ooops, that's what abortion is for. /sarcasm
What happens if the offspring decide to do the right thing and get married, and raise the child? None of this is beyond the realm of possibility, imo. The smart, rich people float in their own environment, as do poor people, illegals, and criminals.
Question is whether it's a second-best "choice", or a primary preference.
The latter seems odd, and really doesn't compute for most people because it's contrary to millenia of human history, to genetics, to anthropology, and just about every other characteristic of human civilization.
And per the foregoing, there *is* no civilization with single motherhood as a "preference".
Well in these women's case, the sex wasn't free was it?
You should have pinged wagglebee in reply to me.
And I agree with you.
Oh, no! A.B. Normal!
When it comes to shaking men down for money, there's nothing the "family" courts will stop at. Case (after case) in point.
Thanks; I try to remember but often do not.
I won't crack wise on this one -- As a matter of a very prudent and commonsense precaution, I would advise everyone to have a complete family medical history prior to conception. Geneticists can easily work out the odds of some horrible disease. Unfortunately, this is rarely done -- since it isn't covered by health insurance.
That said, the risk of some terrible disease befalling a kid conceived the old fashion way of bumping bellies is far greater than the risk of half-siblings meeting and falling in love.
And I grew up in a single-parent home (7 kids!) and came out allright. She died very young, just fom having too much of a load for too long.
I knew my Dad but he wasn't a part of my life.
All that notwithstanding, kids need a dad and a mom, if at all possible. Putting one into a single parent home on purpose is just selfish.
These kids are getting the love they need. If only the rest of the world would be so lucky.
As best I can tell, you are both pro-abortion, I find that view offensive, but I do not feel the animosity toward you that you seem to feel toward me.
"Large" is a pretty non-specific number to cause you to go off on an arithmetic spree to try prove it false. Of course it's not large compared to WWI or WWII -- and I'll note that the huge number of children who grew up in mother-only homes in those eras did just fine on the whole. Compared to the generation in which the people who are currently having babies grew up, there will be signficantly more children growing up over the next 15-20 years in war-widow-headed homes.
It's all about THEMSELVES, isn't it? Maybe that's why they've had difficulty finding 'Mr. Right'.
"As best I can tell, you are both pro-abortion, I find that view offensive, but I do not feel the animosity toward you that you seem to feel toward me."
How on earth would you be able to tell that? And why on earth would you also believe we feel animosity toward you?
Maybe it might be because you are on here posting that just because these women are buying semen to produce kids that they are also having abortions? Nah, that can be it at all.
Whatever, I'm done with this argument.
I know, but my point is that in terms of day to day life experience, a mother-only home is a mother-only home. It will be tougher for kids who started out with a father, and had one long enough to remember it (i.e. past age 3), and then lost the father to divorce, abandonment, or death, than for those who didn't start out with a father and thus don't have that sense of loss. Apart from that distinction, the quality of the child's life is likely to track the quality of the mother pretty directly.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.