Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fox in Tijuana: 'Walls are not the solution'
San Diego Union - Tribune ^ | 5/19/06 | Sandra Dibble

Posted on 05/19/2006 10:02:14 AM PDT by NormsRevenge

TIJUANA – They were just miles away but worlds apart, two presidents grappling with the thorny issue of illegal immigration from opposite sides of the fence.

As President Bush swung through southern Arizona yesterday, Mexican President Vicente Fox traveled to his country's northern border, speaking out against U.S. proposals for strict immigration enforcement.

“Walls are not the solution,” Fox said after sharing lunch with a group of factory workers in Tijuana. “And neither is the National Guard.”

Fox took advantage of his visit to two of Mexico's largest border cities – Tijuana and Mexicali – to signal his opposition to President Bush's plans to send 6,000 U.S. National Guard troops to help secure the border with Mexico. In his strongest criticism yet, Fox denounced a proposal for double-and triple-layered fencing along 370 miles of the border, which was approved Wednesday by the U.S. Senate.

In recent days, Fox has been harshly criticized in Mexico for not speaking out about the plan to send the National Guard to the border, a move that Bush proposed Monday. Mexican media have portrayed Fox's efforts to influence U.S. immigration reform as a failure, and Mexico's leftist candidate for president on Wednesday accused Fox of a tepid response to the military deployment.

“He has not the slightest intention of making an energetic protest,” Andrés Manuel López Obrador said during a campaign stop in the northern Mexican state of Sinaloa. “He is acting like a puppet, a plaything of foreign governments.”

Fox and his foreign minister agreed late Wednesday to send a diplomatic note expressing the Mexican government's concern about a deployment of the National Guard.

As his office prepared to message Washington, D.C., yesterday, Foreign Minister Luis Ernesto Derbéz insisted “there is no chilling nor heating up” of the relationship between Mexico and the United States. The Fox government simply wants to make it “very clear that the National Guard should not be used for matters of apprehension or detention, not only of our countrymen but of any nationality that is crossing the border,” he said.

The Mexican president broached the topic of U.S. immigration policy at least twice during his visit to Baja California. His first stop of the day was Mexicali, just 50 miles west of Yuma, Ariz., where President Bush toured the border and expressed his support for additional fencing to slow the rising tide of illegal immigration.

Fox voiced his objections about the border fence during a ceremony celebrating the expansion of a truck plant, Kenworth de Mexico.

He praised the region's thriving commerce, and said fences were counterproductive to the interests of both countries.

“The construction of barriers at the border does not offer an effective response for a relationship between friends, neighbors and partners,” Fox said.

Later, in Tijuana, when he met with workers at the electronics maquiladora Plamex, Fox spoke directly – and sternly – to the American public.

“To those in front – I am referring to the United States – I want to tell you to be very respectful of Mexico, to be very respectful of the dignity of Mexicans, to not see them as lesser, and to not discriminate against nor violate the human rights of our dear countrymen in the United States,” he said.

Fox has consistently pushed for a guest worker program, and has urged the United States to consider amnesty for most of the estimated 11 million to 12 million immigrants living illegally in the country.

The legislation being considered by the Senate includes a measure to heighten control over the borders, but also creates a guest worker program and offers a path to citizenship for millions of illegal immigrants already in the country.

Senate leaders say they hope for passage of the controversial legislation before the Memorial Day weekend. It then would have to be reconciled with an enforcement-heavy bill that the House of Representatives approved in December.

As the Senate prepares to vote, Fox plans to travel to California, Washington state and Utah.

Fox is scheduled to speak to a joint session of the state Legislature on Thursday in Sacramento, before attending a reception and dinner hosted by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger. The Mexican president will then fly to Los Angeles on May 26 for a private meeting with Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa before returning to Mexico.

Schwarzenegger's office said his meeting with Fox would focus on shared economic goals such as increasing tourism and trade. California is Mexico's second-largest trading partner after Texas, with California exports to Mexico totaling $18 billion last year.

“I think the key thing is not to make the immigration issue overshadow everything else. There are other serious issues that we have to talk about,” Gov. Schwarzenegger said Wednesday in Sacramento. “We can all benefit by the more we work together.”


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; Government; Mexico; Politics/Elections; US: Arizona; US: California; US: Texas; US: Utah; US: Washington
KEYWORDS: borderfence; openborders; solution; tijuana; walls; wallsarethesolution
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 next last
br>PEGGY PEATTIE / Union-Tribune

In a Tijuana speech yesterday, Mexican President Vicente Fox opposed the U.S. sending the National Guard to the border.


1 posted on 05/19/2006 10:02:16 AM PDT by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
"Walls are not the solution,” Fox said ...

You're right, Vicente. The real solution would be to reform your cruddy government and miserable economy so that half your population wouldn't be dying to leave the country.

2 posted on 05/19/2006 10:03:43 AM PDT by Tax-chick (Knights of Columbus martyrs of Mexico, pray for us! Viva Cristo Rey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Then I propose we set up minefields and interloping fields of fire... ;)


3 posted on 05/19/2006 10:03:45 AM PDT by BladeLWS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

It sounds like regime change may be the solution. Six thousand national guard troops ought to be about right to do the job. /s


4 posted on 05/19/2006 10:04:20 AM PDT by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Considering how effective Fox has been at keeping his people from crossing the border he'll have to forgive us for not really giving two hoots what he thinks may or may not be solution.


5 posted on 05/19/2006 10:04:31 AM PDT by Bikers4Bush (Flood waters rising, heading for more conservative ground. Vote for true conservatives!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

I agree with him. Walls are not the solution. Minefields are.........


6 posted on 05/19/2006 10:04:40 AM PDT by Red Badger (Liberals ignore criminal behavior, reward sloth and revere incompetence...........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Well,if that's case,Vincente,then open up your southern borders.Until you do that,we'll know that you're motivated by a desire to get all those Western Union Moneygrams from the US,which make up something like 33% of your nation's gross per capita income.
7 posted on 05/19/2006 10:09:28 AM PDT by Gay State Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Claymores.


8 posted on 05/19/2006 10:09:31 AM PDT by RexBeach ("There is no substitute for victory." -Douglas MacArthur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Fox, stay the f out of our internal affairs.


9 posted on 05/19/2006 10:09:35 AM PDT by gafusa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
"Walls are not the solution."

Said the Fox to the Farmer as he was building the hen house.

10 posted on 05/19/2006 10:09:41 AM PDT by Falcon4.0
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RexBeach

Lay more Claymores. No more welfare whores........


11 posted on 05/19/2006 10:10:24 AM PDT by Red Badger (Liberals ignore criminal behavior, reward sloth and revere incompetence...........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: BladeLWS
Walls are 'just good'. There is better for these
infectious hepatitis-, incurable tuberculosis-, typhoid-, cholera-, plague-, measles-, mumps-,
Chagas disease-, leprosy-, incurable Morgellons diseas-,
Dengue fever-, and polio-infested illegal aliens and terrorists.


12 posted on 05/19/2006 10:10:27 AM PDT by Diogenesis (Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

I guess he is staying true to his agreement at W's ranch to integrate Mexico with US and Canada.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1506470/posts


13 posted on 05/19/2006 10:10:31 AM PDT by Spirited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

My advice to Fox. Sit down and shut up jackass! Make your nation a place where people can work hard and better themselves instead of herding your massive ranks of poor to the border.


14 posted on 05/19/2006 10:10:32 AM PDT by Sunshine Sister
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

We have to go to the source of the problem.

What are the guys that shot Ceaucescu doing these days?


15 posted on 05/19/2006 10:11:21 AM PDT by Utahrd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Utahrd
What are the guys that shot Ceaucescu doing these days?

Breathing free.........

16 posted on 05/19/2006 10:13:20 AM PDT by Red Badger (Liberals ignore criminal behavior, reward sloth and revere incompetence...........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick

Amen!


17 posted on 05/19/2006 10:14:44 AM PDT by JZelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

"I agree with him. Walls are not the solution. Minefields are........."

I disagree. Walls are a signifigant deterrent, especially if they are high enough. Having said that, minefields would make some fence hoppers think twice. I also think the concept of the USA-Mexican border as a ground unmanned Search and Destroy proving ground should not be ruled out.

Illegal immmigration is totally out of control, is a threat to our social fabric, and needs to be aggressively countered.


18 posted on 05/19/2006 10:16:33 AM PDT by Cruz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

He's right. 150,000 armed border patrol agents AND a wALL ARE THE ANSWER.


19 posted on 05/19/2006 10:17:03 AM PDT by jw777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cruz

We wouldn't really have to use a lot of mines. Just tell the public that there are some here and there, somewhere over the rainbow..........


20 posted on 05/19/2006 10:18:03 AM PDT by Red Badger (Liberals ignore criminal behavior, reward sloth and revere incompetence...........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson