Posted on 05/15/2006 5:48:16 AM PDT by areafiftyone
May 15, 2006 -- WASHINGTON - In his live, nationally televised address tonight, President Bush will tell Americans that it's impossible to deport the estimated 11 million illegal aliens living here.
"We must reject amnesty, but recognize that it is not realistic to round up millions of people and send them home," said White House spokeswoman Maria Tamburri in a preview of Bush's speech.
She said Bush plans to spell out his vision for sealing the border, enforcing the law, and "creating a rational system for workers to come into our country and to do jobs Americans won't do." Bush plans to visit the U.S.-Mexican border this week, and will dispatch his Cabinet to help sell the immigration plan.
The Senate plans to return to the contentious issue this week now that Republicans and Democrats have a deal to plow through controversial amendments. But the House and Senate are far apart on whether to put illegals on a path to citizenship.
Tamburri said Bush would call for "better equipment, increased funding, and advanced technology" to secure the border.
She didn't confirm press reports that Bush wants to expand deployments of National Guard Troops to step up border enforcement. Some Guard troops are already deployed in Arizona and New Mexico, but Bush is considering a big increase.
White House National Security Adviser Stephen Hadley said that enforcement was the Border Patrol's job - but then asked whether they needed help from the Guard on an "interim basis."
"This is not about militarizing the border," he said. The president is looking to do everything he can to secure the border. It's what the American people want."
(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...
Send them this link (clickable graphic):
Not many on FR know this about me, but, I have a DIL who is mexican. I also have a grandson 7, and our granddaughter that died when she was 5 1/2 months old, who is half mexican. This isn't about mexicans, it's about illegal aliens. No matter their country of origin.
Bush seems to keep getting the job of cleaning up decades of every other admins messes.
I agree.
I think we need to deal with this now while there is fear of elections in Congress. Congress would like to kick this down the road like they have done for the last 20 years, but we can't afford this. There is every possibility that Vicente Fox, who leaves office this year, will be replaced by a Marxist. Then we will have an even worse relationship with Mexico, an less cooperation, if not active efforts to take over the border states.
My preference is to immediately pour all of our resources into securing the border, followed by deportation of any criminal illegals immediately (we don't need to keep them in our prisons unless they are murderers or rapists).Send the petty criminals home, and deport the others when their prison sentences end.
For the ones who are here and peacefully working, I would issue all of them green cards within six months, and require that green card in order to gain employement. If they don't get a green card, no work. And if they aren't working, no unemployment or welfare...send them home.
This would still leave a lot of people here, but I think it is a strategy which would avoid ACLU challenges and would get a handle on who we have in this country.
I do grow vegetables and pick them. I use organic methods to produce much better tasting produce than any of the mass-produced genetically-altered corporate farms do.
You don't know me and yet you think you know what I do! What a laugh! It exposes your thinking as biased and shallow.
Tell me something else I don't do!
How about I don't clean my toilet?
I don't press my clothes?
I don't cook my meals?
Cut my grass?
By the way I like the President, voted for him twice, attended his first term inaugural ball, gave the maximum to his campaigns and defended him daily....except for the illegal alien issue. I saw this problem more than 15 years ago in Los Angeles and have warned people around me as to the true nature of the problem. I have been laughed at, ignored, thought crazy, thought racist and now, just now many of those people are nodding that I do indeed have credibility.
But the President has lost credibility here. And it is not my fault.
LOL!
Dane,
It sure sounds like YOU don't need the kind of "job an American won't do", but I have friends who work on pig farms, chicken farms, contruction, etc.
As a teen I DID work picking vegtables and tobacco during the summer for spending money.
I also put myself through engineering school working road contruction and digging ditches during the summer.
Maybe YOUR elitist friends won't get their hands dirty, but there are still a hell of a lot of Americans who do this kind of work EVERY DAY to make a living, and they do not want these jobs taken away from them or their wages depressed by illegals.
"we can't..." ...in sharp contrast to his idea that "we can" democratize a country that has been anything but since the beginning of time..
And what really irks me is that our house is on fire and I am told to stop complaining about it.
This is what infuriates me too!
go away
So, in fact, you haven't seen any poll about anything, except maybe for one done by your posse pals. You got nothing. There is no reputable poll that shows what you said earlier, so I guess you just made it up. And that line, which I'm sure you did read, said that I blew your assertion out of the water.
If *you* doubt my credibility, well it's just one more thing for me to brag about.
" Everywhere there is a large bloc of hispanics the bullets are flying. That is fact, not fiction. Sound racist? To damn bad."
Not racist at all. It's the truth.
Go back and re-read what I actually SAID---which was to double the enforcement budget for deportations. THAT is what changes the number from 1.5 million to 3.0 million. Not "magic".
"Again a nice attempted dodge on the "legitamcy" issue. I was not addressing the legitamacy of the aliens, but rather the legitamcy of the premise that you can deport 11 million. Still haven't seen you address that on a practical basis."
Since we're talking about an already legitimate process that deports 1.5 million a year, why should there be a question about the legitimacy of deporting 11 million???
"I question whether you can control the borders without having control of the illegal population already within the country. If there is a community of illegals for them to enter, the motivated ones will find a way to get in and join it. I am a strong proponent of controlling the borders, but you cannot control the borders without gaining control of the illegal community within the borders. You can't do that if deportation is the primary solution."
It would seem to me that deporting them DOES "get control of the illegal community within the borders.
I won't be listening to this crap tonight either.
I have no idea, since of course, I'm not law enforcement. But, I suspect what you are trying to say is we can't do anything about illegal lettuce pickers. Is that your point?
susie
Thanks
Done.............
I understand your perspective. I just have faith, I guess, that as other Catholic demographic groups have verrrry gradually decided to vote conservative, so will some of the assimilated new Americans. I am not as pessimistic as you about the future. I am really worried about the near term effects on conservative issues. If we do not keep the majority we have NO HOPE of controlling immigration.
I'm Catholic, too, and cringe at Liberation Theology, etc.
That shouldn't be so hard to pass or enforce.
>Your argument is completely baseless andWill you be submitting an abuse report for this post?
> you wouldn't look so stupid if you would
> drop it.
No, I would accept the advice of such a poster, realize that my argument that somehow Tom Tancredo would have a better voting record, from a conservative standpoint, if he had not had a career in the public sector before being elected to Congress. I would accept the fact that Tom Tancredo's rating of 100% from the American Conservative Union completely discredits such an argument. I would feel stupid for having made it - especially if I'd already learned that Tom Tancredo had received a 100% "Best and Brightest" rating from the American Conservative Union. I may resent the harshness of the poster, but realized that I did in fact look stupid for continuing to make the same discredited argument argument and then I would have dropped the argument from any future posts knowing how stupid it made me look for making it.
But that's just me.
It's funny, Mister President, how we "could" tie the Border Patrol's hands behind their back and allow twelve million people to invade America. I can only speak for myself of course, Sir, but no matter how much you and the Congress of the USA repeat that babble about how we "can't" round up twelve million (or eleven million as you politicians are now calling them) people and send them home; in my mind I don't see "can't", I see "won't".
Rounding up and sending home, a mere eleven or twelve million illegal aliens, an achievement you call impossible, is a minor chore, compared to the mammoth chore of civilizing sixty billion Muslims; an achievement you are convinced we "can" do.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.