Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Televangelist couple at center of debt controversy
WFAA ^ | may 3 2006 | Brett Shipp

Posted on 05/04/2006 6:40:34 AM PDT by The Lumster

Two of the most prominent faces in American televangelism, Kenneth and Gloria Copeland of Fort Worth, preach the gospel of financial prosperity.

But News Eight learned some former business associates are wondering why that gospel didn't apply to everyone in the flock.

The people who ran Affordable Homes Limited said it was just about to take off when the Copelands suddenly backed out and left tens of thousands of dollars of debt.

While limited partners like the Copelands have no financial obligation to pay the company's debts, the question being asked by creditors is how do the Copelands later pay $20 million in cash for a jet?

(Excerpt) Read more at wfaa.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: copeland; debt; fraud; televangelist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-157 next last
He that oppresseth the poor to increase his riches, and he that giveth to the rich, shall surely come to want. Prov 22:16
1 posted on 05/04/2006 6:40:37 AM PDT by The Lumster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: The Lumster

How come you never hear of televolutionists doing stuff like this?


2 posted on 05/04/2006 6:43:26 AM PDT by Oztrich Boy (Against stupidity the gods themselves contend in vain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oztrich Boy

Code of honor, monkeys don't fleece monkeys


3 posted on 05/04/2006 6:46:16 AM PDT by The Red Zone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Oztrich Boy

They must secretly believe in evolution, and it corrupted them. Ideas do have consequences.


4 posted on 05/04/2006 6:46:58 AM PDT by js1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Oztrich Boy

Well there aren't any televolutionists are there? HoweverI wonder if one could make as much money?


5 posted on 05/04/2006 6:47:34 AM PDT by trashcanbred (Anti-social and anti-socialist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: The Lumster

What's the currency, Kenneth?


6 posted on 05/04/2006 6:47:54 AM PDT by freedomson (Tagline comment removed by moderator)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oztrich Boy
Church Inc.
We put the money in moneychangers.

Bastardizing Christianity since 1920.

7 posted on 05/04/2006 6:48:16 AM PDT by mnehring (http://abaraxas.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: The Lumster

8 posted on 05/04/2006 6:49:52 AM PDT by freedomson (Tagline comment removed by moderator)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Lumster

Wow, he has a website dedicated to his new $20 million toy.

http://www.elitecxteam.org/


9 posted on 05/04/2006 6:50:39 AM PDT by mnehring (http://abaraxas.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Lumster
While limited partners like the Copelands have no financial obligation to pay the company's debts, the question being asked by creditors is how do the Copelands later pay $20 million in cash for a jet?

WHAT A SLANTED, BIAS, LEFTIST BUNCH OF HOOEY!!

The Copeland's, or the ministry, is out ONE AND ONE-HALF MILLION DOLLARS. Using an airplane is immaterial. Sheesh!

10 posted on 05/04/2006 6:50:57 AM PDT by BikerGold (Reliously Uncoorect...Reliously UUUUUUncorrect)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Lumster
Apparently, they're good at asking for money, but making it? There is more to the story I bet.
11 posted on 05/04/2006 6:52:01 AM PDT by Dallas59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Lumster

Saw that report. As much as I despise the Copelands for their heretical teachings, they had no obligation to pour more money into this venture that was apparently a money losing proposition.

I feel sorry for the creditors that this company stiffed and for the employees and managers who are out of a job, but that is a problem with the company, not with the limited partners who had invested a large sum of money to start the company up.

As for where they got the cash to buy a $20 million Cessna, it apparently came from contributions to their "ministry" which is completely unrelated to their investment in this failed company.


12 posted on 05/04/2006 6:52:13 AM PDT by VRWCmember
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Lumster
Ouch.. doing a little googling to find out who this guy is and most of the links are to apologetics type sites skewering him.

http://www.apologeticsindex.org/c53.html
13 posted on 05/04/2006 6:54:21 AM PDT by mnehring (http://abaraxas.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VRWCmember

You are totally right. Also, if they weren't "The Copelands" this would not be an issue.


14 posted on 05/04/2006 6:57:36 AM PDT by I'm ALL Right!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: BikerGold
WHAT A SLANTED, BIAS, LEFTIST BUNCH OF HOOEY!! The Copeland's, or the ministry, is out ONE AND ONE-HALF MILLION DOLLARS. Using an airplane is immaterial. Sheesh!

Did you read the article? Copeland goes in as a 49% "limited" partner in a company. He puts 1.5 million into the company, and then, just as the company is getting ready to take off, he pulls out, leaving $40k in unpaid debts. There's no indication that Copeland was forced to pull out - he did so voluntarily, thus giving up the $1.5 million.

Sounds to me like he was looking to use the business as a tax shelter and then pulled out when it looked like he would have to report income.

It may be legal, but it's morally reprehensible for a minister of the Gospel not to pay his debts. Forty grand is chump change when you just spent twenty million.

15 posted on 05/04/2006 7:00:11 AM PDT by Terabitten (The only time you can have too much ammunition is when you're swimming.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: VRWCmember; I'm ALL Right!

Exactly.

Well stated by both of you.


16 posted on 05/04/2006 7:00:33 AM PDT by Skooz (Chastity prays for me, piety sings.......Modesty hides my thighs in her wings......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: freedomson

I don't know, but that guy's smile looks a lot like Smilin' Bob's. Wifey looks pretty happy, too.


17 posted on 05/04/2006 7:01:59 AM PDT by MineralMan (non-evangelical atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Oztrich Boy
I seem to remember Madelyn Murray O'Hair abscounding with a bunch of donations for her atheistic organization and subsequently getting snuffed out.

But maybe she only stole it cuz she was a closet Christian...we all know atheists never do anything bad.

18 posted on 05/04/2006 7:02:40 AM PDT by Sam's Army (Another unsuccessful attempt to refrain from posting)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: The Lumster
First of all, this is a REPORTER. Get it? They HATE Christians. You are being played.

You have no idea what the full story is.

Second, the Bible is CLEAR that you must have two or three (credible) witnesses, and so far, we don't know that any of these people are credible.

Third, a limited partner may withdraw from something at any time. That's why it isn't a corporation. How do you know what the OTHER limited partners were told by the Copelands? Maybe all along they were being told to "go slow," or "something isn't right about this."

Fourth, I know for a fact that the airplane was a special offering that was paid for a year or so ago. So what if I have a big house---how does that affect whether or not I stay in a bad investment.

I'm warning you people, know what you're talking about before you cast stones. Both Jesus and Paul warned about this kind of jumping to conclusions.

When Peter looked at John and said, "Hey, what about THIS GUY?" Jesus said, in essence, "Mind your own business. You do what I have called YOU to do, and let Me worry about him." Unless I know EVERY DETAIL of this business transaction, it is none of my affair.

19 posted on 05/04/2006 7:02:43 AM PDT by LS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trashcanbred
Well there aren't any televolutionists are there?

David Suzuki?
David Attenbourough (sp?)
The late Carl Sagan?

And to be honest, these fellows do (and did in Sagan's case) work as
academics, being compensated for their research and explaining their
work and viewpoint to the masses.
And weren't shamelessly soliciting donations from pensioners.

That does put these televangelist wolves to even more shame.
IMHO, they belong with the "millstone about the neck and cast into
the sea" crowd.
20 posted on 05/04/2006 7:04:05 AM PDT by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-157 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson