Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Governor running out of time to decide on LNG project
nola.com ^ | 05/03/06 | AP

Posted on 05/03/2006 12:55:53 PM PDT by Ellesu

BATON ROUGE, La. (AP) — Concerns that fisheries in the Gulf of Mexico could be harmed by a proposed offshore natural gas port have not been resolved, opening the possibility that Gov. Kathleen Blanco could veto the project, administration officials say.

Blanco has until Sunday to file any objections to a proposed federal license for the Main Pass Energy Hub, a liquefied natural gas terminal being sought by New Orleans-based McMoRan Exploration Co.

The governor has said she will invoke her veto power over such ports unless they are proven environmentally safe. But only one LNG port exists in the Gulf and scientific evidence is limited.

Several other ports are proposed off Louisiana's coast. Although Blanco openly backed the projects initially, she has since voiced concern about environmental effects.

(Excerpt) Read more at nola.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; US: Louisiana
KEYWORDS: blancolouisiana; energy; gas; lng; naturalgas

1 posted on 05/03/2006 12:55:57 PM PDT by Ellesu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Ellesu

Environmental concerns? They'll never learn will they?


2 posted on 05/03/2006 12:59:14 PM PDT by kerryusama04 (Isa 8:20)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ellesu
The fish harm canard is the usual leftists liberal drivel. Watch liberals, anything but more energy supply and lots of new taxes.
3 posted on 05/03/2006 1:01:07 PM PDT by Tarpon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kerryusama04

Blank - o ..voted for it, before she voted against it...typical sounding move


4 posted on 05/03/2006 1:01:34 PM PDT by JoanneSD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ellesu

Proof positive that politcians still don't get it. What's wrong with those people?


5 posted on 05/03/2006 1:05:45 PM PDT by saganite (Billions and billions and billions-------and that's just the NASA budget!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: saganite

...... What's wrong with those people?....

Gross ignorance and cowardice. She lacks the knowledge and doesn't trust her advisors. The result is dithering and preparing a defense. Her ass is all that counts. It must be completely covered.


6 posted on 05/03/2006 1:08:45 PM PDT by bert (K.E. N.P. Slay Pinch)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Ellesu
Blanco figures there's loot to be derived out of this project, as gas hogs are in heat.
She's holding out for a big, bigger, biggest cut.
She doesn't know about timely evacuation, but darn well about reigning in loot.
7 posted on 05/03/2006 1:10:55 PM PDT by hermgem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ellesu
This lady has no clue to what she is passing up. CNG trucks are being used more and more by large firms. If they don't let them build the facility...fine they will build it in Mississippi or Texas.

What a pair of dueling dunces they have (Mayor & Governor) in LA.
8 posted on 05/03/2006 1:13:15 PM PDT by oxcart (Journalism (Sic))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kerryusama04

China will be drilling off the Keys and our environmental idiots will complain that we will cause pollution.

(It's going to happen. China and Cuba have signed an agreement. Which, btw, makes me wonder about our 200mile exploration range in the waters...)


9 posted on 05/03/2006 1:13:57 PM PDT by OpusatFR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kerryusama04

"Environmental concerns? They'll never learn will they?"

Nope. I have personally heard the New Orleans COE district beg for money from the MVD COE Division and eventually Congress to update and maintain levees, among other things.

Every time it was turned down because money was earmarked for some waterfowl preservation, habitat renewal or denied because of environmental impacts. We saw how that turned out.


10 posted on 05/03/2006 1:17:36 PM PDT by L98Fiero (I'm worth a million in prizes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tarpon
The fish harm canard is the usual leftists liberal drivel. Watch liberals, anything but more energy supply and lots of new taxes.

When it comes to pandering on the environment the Republicans are no different. Bush won't allow drilling off Flordia, Schwartzenegger won't allow it off California, Dole threatens to block it off North Carolina, and on and on and on.

11 posted on 05/03/2006 1:21:33 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
Gov Bush has been supportive of some drilling of Florida. No not across the straits in Cuba :-), but within I think 100 miles. Personally, I want the fish attractors closer than that, 25 miles would be fine with me.

The Destin dome is the big deal off of Florida, huge natural gas reserves. Florida wants clean energy, what better way to get it than drill of the coast and pipe the stuff to clean burning power plants onshore.

But I agree, in general, the ones you cite are not too helpful.
12 posted on 05/03/2006 1:26:23 PM PDT by Tarpon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: L98Fiero

I'm just surprised that the good governor still has her priorities out of whack. The lefties go waaayyy out of their way to protect the ocean or some forest from some perceived threat, then a hurricane or a wildfire comes along and puts them in their place, and they come back with the some old crap. This is so frustrating.


13 posted on 05/03/2006 1:48:13 PM PDT by kerryusama04 (Isa 8:20)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: OpusatFR

200 miles would put the line on the other side of Cuba.

It's 200 miles or halfway between two nations if the distance is less then 400 miles.


14 posted on 05/03/2006 1:53:34 PM PDT by Cold Heart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

With your examples, it is realy the NIMBY mentality that's exploiting environmental concerns as cover.


15 posted on 05/03/2006 2:10:40 PM PDT by doc30 (Democrats are to morals what and Etch-A-Sketch is to Art.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: OpusatFR
China will be drilling off the Keys and our environmental idiots will complain that we will cause pollution.

And with diagonal and lateral drilling, how much oil will Cuba and China be siphoning from American deposits before they actually tap Cuba's?

16 posted on 05/03/2006 2:12:29 PM PDT by doc30 (Democrats are to morals what and Etch-A-Sketch is to Art.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: oxcart

17 posted on 05/03/2006 5:31:52 PM PDT by Ellesu (www.thedeadpelican.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson