Posted on 05/03/2006 12:39:24 PM PDT by BladeLWS
And here I was going to offer him a discount coupon for a used Quran. hahahahaha
He's either an old man pretending to be a young kid, or he's a 29 year old liar. I think it's a safe bet to say he's the latter. LOL
Why, then, did he not order ZM executed?
It was obvious that ZM was an enemy combatant, an open and notorious one, since 9:03AM on 9/11/01.
As he was not in uniform and was caught behind our lines, he had no claim to Geneva Convention protection.
What he did was infinitely worse than the Germans caught on Amagansett Beach in 1942.
THEY were dead in a month.
What possible excuse does W have for allowing this farce to play out in the US civil courts?
Wow, he really is gone? Guess I have to get back to my chores now. Play time is over. here kitty, kitty....LOL
Praying for prison justice for this homicidal clown...
later, gator
Again, well put!
God's punishment is used by some death penalty opponents to say that we are not justified in executing murderers. Your post perfectly describes my feelings as to why we are justified in doing so.
ROTFLMMFAO! Nice bust!
LOL! FReeper high-five, SLAP!
Only true thing this human turd has ever said in his life.
But what if those 1000 free murderers go out and each kill several more innocent victims?
In Texas, the poster child for the death penalty is Kenneth Allen McDuff.
McDuff was first sentenced to death in 1968 for murdering two teen-age boys and raping and strangling a 16-year-old girl. In 1972, the Supreme Court abolished the death penalty. His sentence was commuted to life in prison and he was released on parole 17 years later.
Making up for lost time, he started murdering again. In the early 90s, he was convicted of abducting and murdering two more women, but several other victims have been identified. Authorities believe he may have murdered as many as a dozen other people. He was finally executed in 1998, saving countless other victims.
I could accept life in prison as an alternative to the death penalty if it really meant life in prison. Too often, after 20 years or so, victims' families are gone and the public forgets. Then some parole board feels sorry for an old coot who has spent most of his life in prison and decides to turn him loose.
As to staying on topic, I must disagree with the jury on this one.
or he could just off himself..investigator to court "yes your honor, we know he's dead of 6 gunshots to the head..honestly, it's the worst case of suicide we've ever seen"...
Absolutely. This was a big mistake. He'll be baaaack - I don't know how, but he will be.
Nicew to meet you MOGirl. I am all kinds of game fora massive out in the streets march against all this foolishness.
The folks that see things in a realistic light are the ones that are busy at work working check to check. We are the ones that see the reality of things partially due to that fact.
IN the past most of us have reserved our protest time for the voting booth. That is where it really matters but it sure sppears that is not enough these days.
I am only a little over an hour from you here just outside the capitol of Illinois. Everyone I have talked to today is salty about this verdict and I would bet that is the case for most in between us too.
Something has got to give....and I fear it will be peace here that gives before the leftists take a realistic look at where their ideology is taking this nation.
It's sad to say this but, we're gonna have to change the way the jury votes count. With all the liberals and anti-death people, we may have to move to majority cast the deciding vote whether it be life in prison or the death sentence.
Why? Because he doesn't hold that power. That is for a jury wether it be of civilians or a military tribunal.
He indeed was captured inside the borders of this nation and the courts have now applied our constitution to those folks that are, wether they are citizens or not. Hence padilla being transferred to civilian custody. See the pattern? Does it scare you? I hope so, it should.
What excuse? How about the ACLU and leftist judges and lawyers that agree with them. You know, the crew that has made it almost impossible to direct enforcment of laws by creating excuses that somehow release personal responsibility.
I would agree to the majority rather than unanimous for verdicts. Sure seems to be given credability and validity when UMMMM those black robes come with a 5-4 decision.
This cat should have been executed to show the world how serious this nation is about deleting terrorism,and appeasement for it, from the equation of life on this planet in 2006 and beyond.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.