One of the attorneys was on TV yesterday with the information Nifong gave the judge in order to get a search warrant; in it he stated flatly that the DNA "would positively" identify the player, or words close to that.
Evidently they are now going to say that if he was that sure when he went for the DNA, he cannot not say that they might have worn condoms -- and that he cannot say that lack of a match doesn't mean anything.
I got the impression these guys are not going to take much crap off Nifong.
"One of the attorneys was on TV yesterday with the information Nifong gave the judge in order to get a search warrant; in it he stated flatly that the DNA "would positively" identify the player, or words close to that."
One thing that seems clear is that the early public statements expressing certainty before the reults were in were a mistake.
If I'm Nifong I'm going to start putting out feelers to the various firms to figure out which one I'm going to join in private practice come November.
I got the impression these guys are not going to take much crap off Nifong.
Lemme guess, Nifong is a dim ? He sounds a tad bit like a knee-jerk reactionary as opposed to reasonable professional amd has publically painted himself into a corner.
I'm glad the defense attorneys are not impressed, IMO, this story seemed fishy from the start.
Thomas said one of the attorneys representing team members had interviewed the other dancer extensively, and she said the alleged victim never told her about a rape.