Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

(San Francisco)Mayor: City would ignore (immigration)legislation if it were to pass
The Examiner ^ | April 7, 2006 | Justin Jouvenal

Posted on 04/07/2006 1:01:19 PM PDT by Daytyn71

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-99 last
To: Anti-Bubba182
This is no brave comment from the Mayor. The House bill as passed there has NO chance of passing. Newsome knows it. The statement is pure theater.

Bullseye. Any bill congress finally passes will be so weak on enforcement that it will be completely useless. But you can't blame Gavin; he's taking his cue from McCain.

81 posted on 04/07/2006 7:35:19 PM PDT by Starve The Beast (I used to be disgusted, but now I try to be amused)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Daytyn71

As I said before, cut off every Federal dime going to the city. Let them live with their decision.


82 posted on 04/07/2006 7:40:54 PM PDT by headstamp (Nothing lasts forever, Unless it does.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Daytyn71

FReepers should boycott san francisco???
absolutely....we did our part on spring break. we changed our flight from san franciso to san jose and stayed in half moon bay. in addition, we didn't visit san fran nor did we spend any money to support their ridiculous stance on everything we value. we decided as a family we can't support these clowns. i'm even prouder of my 15 yo who has turned into quite the little conservative. we discussed our last visit and remembered the filthy streets, the homeless harrasing us at every stop sign and were wondering why we ever liked the place to begin with.


83 posted on 04/07/2006 7:52:38 PM PDT by dreamerintexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Daytyn71; jw777; Servant of the 9; zerosix; FormerLib; LibLieSlayer; rolling_stone; beeler; ...
Newsom better watch himself. SF citizens have plenty of grounds to sue.

EXHIBIT ONE Elected officials are violating their oaths of office by not adhering to the law, and by failing to act as required when receiving complaints of known incidences of illegal wrongdoing, and by failing to follow government-mandated regulatory reviews.

This is a violation of public servant's Penal Law .135.60 COERCION IN THE SECOND DEGREE (a Class A misdemeanor).

PENAL LAW 135.60 (Committed on or after September 1, 1967) is Coercion in the Second Degree. When an individual uses or abuses his/her position as a public servant by performing some act within or related to his or her official duties, or by failing or refusing to perform an official duty, in such manner as to affect some person adversely. Perform any (other) act which would not in itself materially benefit1the actor but which is calculated to harm another person materially with respect to his or her health, safety, business, calling, career, financial condition, reputation or personal relationships. The term(s), ("crime"), ("public servant") used in this definition has its own special meaning in our law.

=====================================

EXHIBIT TWO If duly elected officials, under oath of office, are aiding and abetting illegals:

to break US laws,
to use phony documents at municipal agencies

to take job payments under the table,
to facilitate IRS violations,
to facilitate corporate accounting fraud,
to obtain the unlawful right to vote in US elections, and,

if elected and appointed officals did, in fact, allow illegals to break the law to serve on official municipal councils, and if illegals are making monetary (taxing) decisions for U.S. citizens, and,

if elected and appointed officials took campaign contributions from said illegals, and in the process, deliberately ignored US laws in exchange for campaign contributions, this could be characterized as extortion, and/or bribery, and a violation of The Hobbs Act.

The Hobbs Act was used recently to nail four Tenn state legislators and their aids in an extortion scheme. The TENN groups was arrested under the federal Hobbs Act, charging extortion, conspiracy to extort and attempted extortion, and accepting bribes by an agent of the state.

The Hobbs Act covers extortion by public officials, as follows: 2403 Hobbs Act -- Extortion By Force, Violence, or Fear

The Hobbs Act regulates extortion and robbery, which Congress has determined have a substantial effect on interstate and foreign commerce by reason of their repetition and aggregate effect on the economy. Therefore, the proscribed offenses fall within the category of crimes based on the Commerce Clause whose "de minimis character of individual instances arising under [the] statute is of no consequence."

Primary investigative jurisdiction of offenses in 18 U.S.C. § 1951 lies with the Federal Bureau of Investigation. The Inspector General's Office of Investigations,

Division of Labor Racketeering (formerly the Office of Labor Racketeering), United States Department of Labor, is also authorized to investigate violations of 18

U.S.C. § 1951 in labor-management disputes involving the extortion of property from employers by reason of authority conferred on investigators as Special Deputy

United States Marshals. Supervisory jurisdiction over 18 U.S.C. § 1951 is exercised by the following offices with respect to the offenses noted:

1. Extortion under color of official right or extortion by a public official through misuse of his/her office is supervised by the Public Integrity Section, Criminal Division.

2. Extortion and robbery in labor-management disputes is supervised by the Labor-Management Unit of the Organized Crime and Racketeering Section, Criminal Division.

3. All other extortion and robbery offenses not involving public officials or labor-management disputes are supervised by the Terrorism and Violent Crimes Section, Criminal Division.

SOURCE October 1997 Criminal Resource Manual 2403 http://www.usdoj.gov/usao/eousa/foia_reading_room/usam/title9/crm02403.htm

84 posted on 04/07/2006 8:13:38 PM PDT by Liz (Liberty consists in having the power to do that which is permitted by the law. Cicero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah

I'm not surprise though when I was making the calls through the night, I see SF stinks as a whole just like Chicago! Feinstein is even annoying on her voice message and Click!


85 posted on 04/07/2006 8:23:00 PM PDT by JustPiper (We will NOT be a COMPROMISE !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Daytyn71
The creepy thing is that Newsom was the "moderate" candidate by San Fran standards. He defeated the "more liberal" Green Party candidate in a runoff.

California has moved sooooooooo much more to the right since Ahnuld took office < /sarcasm>

86 posted on 04/07/2006 8:35:35 PM PDT by BillyBoy (Find out the TRUTH about the liberal Democrat's FAVORITE Republican in IL ... www.nopinka.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Volunteer

I can appreciate your dislike of S.F.

I travel frequently to S.F., Berkeley and Santa Monica. I have decided that Santa Monica is the worst of all three. Not by much but Santa Monica IMO takes the award for complete blithering idiot liberal cesspool of the USA.


87 posted on 04/07/2006 10:00:45 PM PDT by A message
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: A message

I'm starting to appreciate San Francisco, BECAUSE of its filth. It's like a bowel magnet, drawing all the crap in our country to itself. I heartily endorse whatever leftwing commune the San Franciscans want to make, so that the few good people living there leave and become good contributors to better communities, and so the crappy leftists in this country congregate there and save the rest of America from their crap. A couple of "Conservative Free" Zones would mean that the rest of America could be "Leftist Free". I like the sound of that. God bless San Fran, please nationalize the businesses in your town, illegalize Christianity, and make homosexuality compulsive. And then after you've Pied Pipered fellow Leftists scattered across the land, who have been screwing up local politics from Florida to Oklahoma to San Diego, well you'd all collapse into your Leftwing black hole distopia and be a lesson in how *not* to live. Godspeed, you socialist morons.


88 posted on 04/08/2006 12:19:57 AM PDT by 0siris
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: zerosix

"the U.S. Government can deny any Federal dollars to a State that refuses to follow the law."


agreed


89 posted on 04/08/2006 1:10:04 AM PDT by taxed2death (A few billion here, a few trillion there...we're all friends right?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Daytyn71
Mayor Gavin Newsom said Thursday that The City will not comply with any federal legislation that criminalizes efforts to help illegal immigrants.

Sure, they could... And the federal government could cut off all funding to the city... And if the state of CA didn't get involved, then all funding to the state could be cut off as well.

Then the mayor could be placed in a cell too...

Mark

90 posted on 04/08/2006 1:23:54 AM PDT by MarkL (When Kaylee says "No power in the `verse can stop me," it's cute. When River says it, it's scary!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Daytyn71

FReepers should boycott San Fran!!

Boycotts don't work. But since I have never been there before I promise not go go at least in the next 3 years while I am stationed in Italy.


91 posted on 04/08/2006 3:54:41 AM PDT by napscoordinator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 0siris

92 posted on 04/08/2006 5:44:23 AM PDT by A message
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

Comment #93 Removed by Moderator

To: Southack
Protect our borders and coastlines from all foreign invaders!

Support our Minutemen Patriots!

Be Ever Vigilant!


94 posted on 04/08/2006 10:45:15 AM PDT by blackie (Be Well~Be Armed~Be Safe~Molon Labe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Daytyn71

Hey, Gavin---wipe that idiotic smile off your face, and hire a good defense lawyer.

95 posted on 04/08/2006 4:33:48 PM PDT by Liz (Liberty consists in having the power to do that which is permitted by the law. Cicero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Daytyn71
they haven’t seen defiance.”

And you haven't seen fear dummy, if'in the Lord God decideds to whang you and your perverted city into the ocean. (Just make certain Michael Savage is still in Miami when it happens.)

96 posted on 04/08/2006 4:39:38 PM PDT by swampfox98 (I voted for George Bush and got Vicente Fox. Phooey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibLieSlayer

There are several cities not enforcing the laws...Chicago, Denver...others. They should pull all federal funding to these cities and they should make them repay what money they accepted from the time they passed sanctuary laws up to now. City gov'ts are so corrupt.


97 posted on 04/08/2006 9:02:06 PM PDT by virgil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: virgil

Absolutely!!! Well said!

LLS


98 posted on 04/09/2006 5:04:19 AM PDT by LibLieSlayer (Preserve America... kill terrorists... destroy dims!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: FormerLib

SF is not part of the republic. It should be cut out and left to survive on its own.


99 posted on 04/09/2006 5:12:28 AM PDT by BooksForTheRight.com (what have you done today to fight terrorism/leftism (same thing!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-99 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson