|
DICK MORRIS: CLINTON IS A PAID AGENT OF THE CROWN PRINCE OF DUBAI
 |
|
Posted on 03/03/2006 7:07:54 PM PST by Mia T
DICK MORRIS: CLINTON IS A PAID AGENT OF THE CROWN PRINCE OF DUBAI
bill clinton made page one of Al Jazeera today. A schizophrenic mix of schadenfreude and agitprop, it was the story of an impeached ex-president of America trashing America--to standing Os--in the Arab state of Dubai--in the middle of a war zone--only several hundred miles from the American troops.
And, to rub it in, the traitor pocketed no less than $200,000 from the enemy for his troubles.
(The Nobel committee, sufficiently mollified only after 24 years of the peanut president's America-bashing, awarded Carter his 1978 Peace Prize finally in 2002.)
Meanwhile, back in the Senate, the missus, the other half of the clinton construct, maintains her hawkish pose (although not without bird problems of another sort).
Yet another example of the clinton conflation ploy, (see SCHEMA PINOCCHIO: how the clintons are handling the hillary dud factor), this variant allows "clinton, the construct" to hold two mutually exclusive positions simultaneously, thereby enabling the missus to avoid in '08 the trap that repeatedly ensnared the ever 'nuanced' Kerry in '04.
Do you now understand how stupid the clintons think you are?
This legacy confab is in and of itself proof certain of clinton's deeply flawed character, and a demonstration in real time of the way in which the clinton years were about a legacy that was incidentally a presidency.
Madeleine Albright captured the essence of this dysfunctional presidency best when she explained why clinton couldn't go after bin Laden.
According to Richard Miniter, the Albright revelation occurred at the cabinet meeting that would decide the disposition of the USS Cole bombing by al Qaeda [that is to say, that would decide to do what it had always done when a "bimbo" was not spilling the beans on the clintons: Nothing]. Only Clarke wanted to retaliate militarily for this unambiguous act of war.
Albright explained that a [sham] Mideast accord would yield [if not peace for the principals, surely] a Nobel Peace Prize for clinton. Kill or capture bin Laden and clinton could kiss the 'accord' and the Peace Prize good-bye.
If clinton liberalism, smallness, cowardice, corruption, perfidy--and, to borrow a phrase from Andrew Cuomo, clinton cluelessness--played a part, it was, in the end, the Nobel Peace Prize that produced the puerile pertinacity that enabled the clintons to shrug off terrorism's global danger.
C-SPAN asked noted presidential historians to rank the American presidents1 along the following ten dimensions: public persuasion, crisis leadership, economic management, moral authority, international relations, administrative skills, relations with congress, vision/setting an agenda, pursued equal justice for all, and performance within context of times.
bill clinton emerged as middling in most dimensions; he was surpassed in others by a settled mediocrity (Carter) and a putative failure (Nixon). In moral authority, bill clinton was rated dead last.2 He did fairly well in public persuasion, not a surprising finding given the volume of snake oil he managed to peddle during his putative presidency.
"It's NOT the economy, stupid!"
Clinton's best scores were on the economic management and pursued equal justice for all dimensions. However, both of these results are meaningful only insofar as they redound to the moral authority dimension: they are wholly based on clinton fraudulence, cooked books and black poses, respectively; and clinton's shameless Rosa Parks eulogy last week assured us that the insidious brand of clinton racism is alive and well during these tiptoe years of what the clintons hope will be their interregnum.
Note that although Brinkley doesn't place much importance on the economic management dimension--he argues that the economy variable is not durable over time--he fails to recognize that the evaluation of the clinton economy by the historians is erroneous to begin with.
Note also that C-SPAN historians found no evidence of clinton "greatness" irrespective of his moral-authority deficit, contrary to Douglas Brinkley's claim made at the clinton revisionist confab3.
(NOTE: My later research has revealed that Brinkley's qualified mention of clinton "greatness" was not a claim but rather a polite guest's white lie about an abject loser. Instead of taking the AP report at face value, one must carefully parse Brinkley's actual words and especially note the subjunctive construction.)
MIDDLING
If 9/11 taught us anything, it is that presidential character and moral authority count, and count most.4 If the variables are properly weighted, bill clinton will always come out dead last.
That is, unless Americans are dumb enough to make the same mistake twice.
Mia T, 11.10.05
COPYRIGHT MIA T 2004
by Mia T, 11.17.05
id you see it? More to the point, did the American press? 
Having failed to snare the Nobel Peace Prize by ignoring terrorism, clinton has apparently decided to intensify his America-bashing on foreign soil, the method employed by Jimmy Carter to great (if somewhat belated) effect.
h e a r --c l i n t o n --l o s e --i t
by Mia T, 11.11.05
READ MORE
Twenty presidents rank higher than bill clinton and 20 rank lower. But this placement assumes equal weight for each of the dimensions. And therein lies the flaw.
Historian massages clinton numbers, ego + legacy at revisionist confab
C-SPAN historians find no clinton "greatness" irrespective of moral-authority deficit
by Mia T, 11.14.05
(viewing movie requires Flash Player 7, available HERE)
COPYRIGHT MIA T 2006
bttt
Saturday bump ... I used to say Liberalism is a disease in need of eradication. Now it has become apparent the democrap party is in dire need of eradication, along with their anti-American degenerates like slick willy and jimmah snorter.
thx :)
They seem to be in the process of committing suicide. We just have to make certain they don't take the entire country with them.
Morris, after stating that President Bush had only his own laziness to blame, said that he should hold one event a day if he wanted to give the press something to write about. He said that Clinton did this, often not even knowing what was on the paper he read until he read it...and Morris himself had written these statements. I remember the constant coverage of every public word Ex42 said.
If Morris doesn't even know that GWB holds at least one event per day with a foreign dignitary and / or a recent award winner, he is grossly misinformed. We know about these events, at which press is present, by reading the Dose here on FreeRepublic, but the pictures come from AP, Yahoo, etc. and are available for all to see. The ancient MSM simply does not want the public to know how busy Pres. Bush is. He doesn't schmooze them with parties so they want the public to think that he is asleep. It is infuriating.
I remember when Clinton rushed back to the Oval Office from vacation to tell us about Bin Laden....and keep something elso off the front pages. At the time, I thought he was just hyping up a nothing, since, if BL was as bad as Clinton was saying, we surely would have heard of him and have done something about him.
The pieces are falling into place! GHWB was the first president to attempt to usher in the New World Order. He and Barbara were chummy with the Arab aristocracy. He was also noted for furthering financial ties with, and promoting China, where he had previously served as ambassador. Next prez, BuBill, continued the relationship taking beaucoup bucks from the UAE, as well as from the Chinese Communists. (Days of Cosco and Roses). And now with Jeb and BuBill furthering their open relationship with the Arabs, with the Port Deal pending there remains one last piece of the puzzle. Could it be the One Religion and the New World Order complete the puzzle, and the finished picture is ISLAM? Read John Haggee's "Jerusalem Countdown", available at $8.99 at your nearest Costco. No question about it, Islam aims to take over the world.
"Capitalizing on polls showing widespread opposition to the takeover of six U.S. port operations by Dubai Ports World, Senator Hillary Clinton (D-N.Y.) is expanding her complaint about foreign companies operating in the U.S. "
"Allowing businesses headquartered in foreign companies to operate in America is wrong," said Clinton. "It should only be permitted if accompanied by donations that support our electoral processes."
I have spent the last 1/2 hr looking for verifacation on the above quote!! Granted, there is alot going on under the radar screen - but if I'm going to believe/repeat that quote, I need the source, please -- in the meantime this was just posted a few ago - (but I had already read it looking for your source -hehe)
Dick Morris: Clinton on Dubai Payroll
Newsmax.com ^ | March 4, 2006 | Carl Limbacher
Posted on 03/04/2006 11:50:51 AM PST by drhogan
Dick Morris: Clinton on Dubai Payroll
Former President Bill Clinton is up to his eyeballs in dealings with Dubai, his former top political adviser has revealed
. OR
Newsmax.com"
Carter, Clinton, Gore. Anti-freedom, terrorist enablers.
When are the moderates in The Democratic Crime Syndicate going to speak up against them? /sarcasm
Could you link to the FR thread and/or article containing that quote? thx.
ping
ping
ping
Another investment opportunity for those with the big bucks are construction cranes used to erect highrise buildings. Each one you see on the horizon is on top a project of one-half billion dollars or more.
Buying into Islamofascist and DNC talking points designed to sew enmity between the US and a major Middle-Eastern military staging area (for us) is not really all that good an investment.
I thank you for clearing up the following statement from your 'blog' http://www.azconservative.org/Semmens1.htm as a 'spoof'........
"Allowing businesses headquartered in foreign companies to operate in America is wrong," said Clinton. "It should only be permitted if accompanied by donations that support our electoral processes."
********The above is a 'spoof'.********
Now that said - much of what you said is the truth. Spoofing isn't necessary with the clintons - their lives are a lie - for instance ---- see post 168 for NewsMax article by Dick Morris
snip...Dick Morris,--- " Clinton is a paid agent of the crown prince of Dubai, --" snip... "Bill Clinton is a senior adviser - a paid adviser - to a company called Yucaipa which recently set up a relationship with a group called the Yucaipa Investment group to set up a new company called DIGL," Morris said on "The O'Reilly Factor."
snip..."DIGL Inc. is in charge of managing the investments of the crown prince of Dubai throughout the world. Bill Clinton is paid by Yucaipa a percentage of the profits it makes, and Yucaipa said its profits have exceeded 40 percent in recent years."
clinton has also suggested Joe Lockhart as adviser to Dubai. Said he knew the ropes. How long do we have to pay for clinton's trips and DO we pay for 'speaking engagements' where he makes over a 1/4 mil per. Neat way to pay off hillary and help in her election to the White House.
On another note - I was in favor or at least not opposed to this Dubai deal - but if they are in the pocket of the clintons - and clintons are in their pocket my opinion changes.
The clintons are dirty, sneaky, lying, cheating, scum bags! Anything either would recommend would only have $$$ ties to their pockets.
again thank you!!!!!
As an aside, with all the money the Clintons have been raking in from this and so many other sources, Paula Jones made a huge mistake settling for a few hundred thousand dollars.
I agree with you. We, a country in wartime, are in a very bad place. Bush, however, is not without blame.
Funny you would mention gantry cranes. A rather ironic suggestion, given the context. Investing in national-security-vacant hoisting devices has been a long-standing strategy of missus clinton. For her entire adult (such as it is) life, zipper-hoisting has been missus clinton's principal means of upward mobility. Zipper-hoisting has proved to be a sticky wicket for missus clinton, owing not to antithetical feminist ideology, as one would expect -- feminists willingly sacrificed feminism on the altar of clintonism -- but to zipper choice, her rather injudicious attachment early on to a certain zipper habitually on the downslide. As for the larger cranes, with highrise buildings becoming juicy 'military' targets, with engineering and material failures implicated in the WTC collapse, perhaps whooping cranes would be a more national-security-neutral choice, (avian flu notwithstanding).... The strategic importance of Dubai as a staging area is precisely the point. (My point, BTW.) Because of its importance, Bush should never have allowed this issue to develop in the first place. I say this for three reasons:
|
There are no mobs marching in the streets, and hardly any Congress critters have been taken out and slaughtered as sacrifice in this one.
In a week or two you'll see this was as important as Cheney shooting a major campaign contributor!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.