Posted on 02/27/2006 3:21:32 AM PST by paudio
The first trial of a state charged with genocide has opened in The Hague, where Bosnia-Hercegovina will accuse Serbia and Montenegro of war crimes. The International Court of Justice (ICJ) is hearing the case, which Bosnia first brought 13 years ago.
It says Belgrade was responsible for crimes of genocide on its territory during the early 1990s Bosnian war.
Belgrade denies its intention was to wipe out Muslims in eastern Bosnia and says there is no proof of the claims.
(Excerpt) Read more at news.bbc.co.uk ...
Yugoslavia was a Wilsonian nation building experiment that went haywire.
Actually, they were not on their own. Croatia and the Herzegovina part of Bosnia-Herzegovina were part of the Austro-Hungarian Empire and Serbia was part of the Turkish Empire, winning their independence and becoming the Kingdom of Serbia prior to WWI. After WWI Croatia and Slovenia petitioned to become part of Serbia creating the Kingdom of Yugoslavia or Kingdom of Southern Slavs. Croatia and Slovenia were small countries and were looking to Serbia for protection.
I conclude it's right, and you have to look at it more as a one way street kind of thing.
America is big and dominates in culture, trade, innovation, military bases and involvement over the world, etc. While these small countries don't produce any culture that most Americans who not of that ethnic group care about.
They listen to American music, including Albanians in Kosovo - and are knowledgeable about hip hop, rap, etc. and do their own versions and imitations of this. They watch American movies, and if they have access to the internet, the conversations are by and large in English - gives them more motivation to learn, exposure and practice of the language, even if they don't know it well. They also have Americans acting big in their country - the bombing and occupation - or giving them money, working on aid projects.
America is big at shaping and influencing these countries, so they take notice, while Albania has no effective power or sway on Americans.
So, assuming that you have this knowledge you met some that are exceptions. When were you there by the way, just curious?
I've been all over Europe. Not too many people go to Kosovo as a vacation hot spot, in case you haven't noticed. And you spout out your broad generalizations based on your own anecdotal experiences in Kosovo. Maybe you run with the elite set who know more than the average Joe, but the idea that average Joe Kosovo knows more and is better educated in world events and the world at large than Americans is laughable. We have a broad middle class over here that are educated, in case you didn't notice, and in Kosovo there isn't. You can sit there and spout the virtues of Kosovo and its brilliant citizens all you want, but to say the least you strain credulity.
back then, i listened to that station as well, maainly done in Serbian. Why or how could you have understood what they were saying if you were unable to translate my last post to you in Serbian? They had a 30 min English broadcast, which does not allow much information to be putforth. How much Serbian do you understand and speak? Tranlsate what I have here into Serbian to demonstrate your knowledgebase.
Let's look at a little more recent numbers:
Ethnic groups: Serb 37.1%, Bosniak 48%, Croat 14.3%, other 0.6% (2000)
So according to the CIA factbook, as of 2000, Bosniaks were 48% of the population.
Could you look up the percent of Bosniaks right before the war in 1991, and put that up?
They say they were "genocided" so I want to see what percentage they were before the war and how far it has fallen to reach 48%.
Then we could calculate that the Serbs owe the Bosniaks this much for "genocide":
(Prewar Bosniak percentage - 48 (postwar percentage)) multiplied by $10 billion. Therefore you will have the Serbs pay the Bosniaks $10 billion for each percentage point of population they lost.
I think that would be fair - so could you do that calculation?
Of course, I met some Americans that could be exceptions. When you meet those Americans that have been there, then there's an immediate interest and sharing of experiences or opinions. The Albanians; many will have a relative or two, or three, that lives in either the U.S. Germany, UK or somewhere to make a living and sending the salary home. That is the way they do it, or should I say, one of the many ways the family makes a living. This has been going on for generations.
I was in Gjilan/Gnjilane, Kosovo from October 1999 to May 2004. A real eye opener, to say the least.
As far as a vacation land.....You mean, no one goes to "10 Flags over Kosovo"? but, I thought it was a vacation spot, my travel agent lied to me. Can't seem to find him, his office has since closed up....:)))
I think that would be fair - so could you do that calculation?
No I couldn't do that calculation. But not because I couldn't get the information. I'm sure that the communists took a census once or twice.
The reason why I couldn't is because I don't think a single dime should be paid. And I don't think that anybody outside of the countries involved should have lifted a finger for any reason.
You may think that would be fair. Me, I think that it's none of my blasted business.
And that was my original point: we (the US) should have kept our noses out of your business.
These are a people who still practice blood feuds for crying out loud--and you're going to tell me they are some kind of superior cosmopolitans?!?! Gimmee a friggin' break!!!!
keep hammering away at these people on here, regardless if they are pro-Serb or anti-Serb etc... those hacks on LF have been comical relief. I just wonder which one of them is hoplite in drag, disguise.
You up for a trip to the Balkans as part of my Serbian Cycling Challenge 2007? It will be heading through PV, skimming the Kvo border.
I only asked you to do this because the Bosniak population has risen, percentage-wise. Therefore you would have gotten a negative number - I wanted you to see that for yourself, because I am always pointing out that they saw a gain relative to the others (Croats and Serbs) after the war versus before. And so I ask: what kind of "genocide" is it that the "genocided" people end up a larger percentage than the ones who allegedly were doing the "genocide"?
To further complicate things each side would throw culturally appropriate articles into the graves to make it look like the other side did the deed.
Sorry--I meant this for someone else.
These are a people who still practice blood feuds for crying out loud--and you're going to tell me they are some kind of superior cosmopolitans?!?! Gimmee a friggin' break!!!!
superior cosmopolitans?? who said that....? if you plan on earning a living in Germany, France, U.S......etc...what would you do? If the entire support of your family, which is large, depends on you or you sending a family member to another country, and....it has been a practice that is generations old, what do you think? Superior cosmopolitians???? has nothing to do with it. I challenge you to talk to 10 Americans that have not visited Europe or been overseas, or even have for that matter and ask them about the history, current events or whatever about the Balkans. Then find a few Albanians if you can, and try it yourself.
Americans have always been isolationist.....Our education system is also in bad shape......otherwise, I'm moving on here. :)
What has blood feuds got to do with geography, history and surviving......in a world where your livelihood depends on working in other countries and picking the right one.....that works.
Its a matter of culture........and surviving not being a "cosmo"....:))
absolutely..........
long read, starts at page 1 or 2...the preface is long and boring....one can scan to get the idea.
http://microfinancegateway.org/files/22482_14.doc
"on the role of Diaspora communities in reducing poverty in their home countries. This is a narrower focus than the more common question of the links between migration and development, or indeed the role of Diaspora in development. Migration does not always result in the long-term dispersal of a people; some migrants leave their home countries only temporarily, or assimilate into countries of settlement so completely that they lose their distinctive identity and ties to their homelands. And while poverty reduction is assumed to be one of the benefits of development, the relationship is far from linear. In other words, migration does not always result in the formation of a Diaspora community; and development does not always lead to poverty reduction, at least in the short-to-medium term. This paper analyzes the impact of established Diaspora on lifting people in their traditional homelands out of poverty, and identifies ways in which policy interventions, especially from donors of official development assistance, might strengthen that impact. In a few cases, the actions of Diaspora are perverse, and contribute to perpetuating poverty. In such cases, the aim of donor governments is to prevent or at least mitigate such actions."
These are a people who still practice blood feuds for crying out loud--and you're going to tell me they are some kind of superior cosmopolitans?!?! Gimmee a friggin' break!!!!
I believe you sent this response to the wrong person. I'm sure you meant to send it to the guy I've been debating with, not me, as I have the same opinion as you do. You better reread the series of comments to know whom you should be saying this to, and it's not me. Try again.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.