Posted on 02/26/2006 3:50:38 PM PST by redpoll
Early Americans faced rapid late Pleistocene climate change and chaotic environments The environment encountered when the first people emigrated into the New World was variable and ever-changing, according to a Penn State geologist. "The New World was not a nice quiet place when humans came," says Dr. Russell Graham, associate professor of geology and director of the Earth & Mineral Sciences Museum.
Archaeologists agree that by 11,000 years ago, people were spread across North and South America, but evidence is building for an earlier entry into the New World, a date that would put human population of North and South America firmly in the Pleistocene.
"We want to know what it was like back then," says Graham. "What did they have to deal with?"
The Pleistocene Holocene transition took place about 11,000 years ago and caused the extinction of a large number of animal species including mammoths, mastodons and ground sloths. The Holocene looked very different from the Pleistocene.
"We now realize that climate changes extremely rapidly," Graham told attendees at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science today (Feb.19) in St. Louis, Mo. "The Pleistocene to Holocene transition occurred in about 40 years."
As a result, animals and plants shifted around and the people living in the New World had to adapt so that they could find the necessary resources to survive. Graham likened the change to the difference between shopping at a WalMart where there is great abundance and large variety the Pleistocene to suddenly having to shop at a corner convenience store the Holocene. In human terms this means that what grandparents knew to be true about finding resources, could be untrue and not helpful to grandchildren.
During the Pleistocene large eastern coastal resources existed, including walruses, south, as far as Virginia, seals and a variety of fish. Mammoth, caribou and mastodons were plentiful across the continent as well as smaller animals. The situation was not identical in all places across North America because, during segments of the Pleistocene, large portions of the Eastern North American continent were covered in ice, while western locations were ice free much further north.
"The Holocene climate is much more stable than the Pleistocene warmer but more stable," says Graham. "The environment, however, became more homogeneous, there was less variety."
Graham argues that the Pleistocene experienced a series of rapid climate changes that created patchiness in the environment, but that once the climate change that signaled the beginning of the Holocene occurred, the climate settled down. Humans coming into the New World during the late Pleistocene would have encountered an environment shaped by rapid changes creating variety in available food sources both animal and vegetable. The groups of people would have to adapt continually and find new resources, but the variety of resources was out there. After the Holocene took hold, there was less need to adapt constantly, but also fewer options in resources.
Archaeologists and geologists debate whether the climate change at the Pleistocene Holocene transition caused the extinction of the mega fauna or if the influx of humans did in the large animals. Graham believes that it was the unstable changing rapidly changing climate, not human predation that killed the large Pleistocene animals.
Or, evidently, as many ignorant idiots.
Well, has he considered just asking Joe Paterno? *rimshot*
ggg ping
I imagine most animals did not have a fear of humans when the early Indians arrived (slow moving small animal without the four legs of all predators.)
I'm sure as climate change made the great herds of no-extinct animals weaker, that made them easy prey for 10 foot spears with massive clovis spearpoints.
I wonder if 10 foot high ground sloths were tasty?
I imagine most animals did not have a fear of humans when the early Indians arrived (slow moving small animal without the four legs of all predators.)
I'm sure as climate change made the great herds of now-extinct animals weaker, that made them easy prey for 10 foot spears with massive clovis spearpoints.
I wonder if 10 foot high ground sloths were tasty?
I imagine most animals did not have a fear of humans when the early Indians arrived (slow moving small animal without the four legs of all predators.)
I'm sure as climate change made the great herds of now-extinct animals weaker, that made them easy prey for 10 foot spears with massive clovis spearpoints.
I wonder if 10 foot high ground sloths were tasty?
Exactly.
They don't count the legs.
Yup, they feared us ~ even if the bears and wolfes didn't.
Taste like chicken, same as bald eagles and grizzly bears.
bump
Please FREEPMAIL me if you want on or off the
"Gods, Graves, Glyphs" PING list or GGG weekly digest
-- Archaeology/Anthropology/Ancient Cultures/Artifacts/Antiquities, etc.
Gods, Graves, Glyphs (alpha order)
Archaeologists and geologists debate whether the climate change at the Pleistocene Holocene transition caused the extinction of the mega fauna or if the influx of humans did in the large animals.
Like it has to be one or the other. Bunch of BS pseudo science.
|
|||
Gods |
Just updating the GGG info, not sending a general distribution. |
||
· Discover · Nat Geographic · Texas AM Anthro News · Yahoo Anthro & Archaeo · Google · · The Archaeology Channel · Excerpt, or Link only? · cgk's list of ping lists · |
The Cycle of Cosmic Catastrophes:
Flood, Fire, and Famine
in the History of Civilization
by Richard Firestone,
Allen West, and
Simon Warwick-Smith
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.