Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Making Islam illegal -- is it the West's only choice?
Renew America ^ | 2/19/2006 | Warner Todd Huston

Posted on 02/20/2006 7:46:11 AM PST by Dark Skies

When President Bush gave his "axis of evil" speech he went out of his way to make the world understand that it isn't a war with Islam itself that we were joining — and I say joining because the war had been started by the Jihadists decades before. And, in observance to our Western principles, that must be the correct way to view our conflagration with radical Islam.

Let's face facts, it certainly is uncomfortable to a Westerner who has been brought up on tolerance, freedom of religion, and liberty to contemplate a war against an entire religion. But are we approaching a time when Western nations won't have a choice but to target Islam itself in certain ways to keep their own people safe. The best course of action is to make public displays of Islam and certain of its practices illegal in Western nations.

So, the question becomes are we at that time now? Are we fast approaching a time when Mosques will be closed and banned? Have we come to a time when Islamic literature is turned away from our borders? Have the childish and dangerous reactions of Muslims to this cartoon in a Danish newspaper proven that Islam cannot be trusted to be a vital, peaceful, and law-abiding segment of society?

It is looking like yes is the answer to these queries.

We are already approaching this today. In Ontario they have officially outlawed Muslim Sharia law, that law that uses religious precepts to enforce moral and society codes of conduct. And Muslim "family councils" have been stopped where local community groups may supplement Canadian law with their local custom.

Several members of the John Howard administration in Australia have spoken out against Islamic clashes with Western notions of law and societal comportment many times over the last few years.

Recently Howard himself said, "I do think there is this particular complication because there is a fragment which is utterly antagonistic to our kind of society, and that is a difficulty ... You can't find any equivalent in Italian, or Greek, or Lebanese, or Chinese or Baltic immigration to Australia. There is no equivalent of raving on about jihad, but that is the major problem."

Muslims routinely destroy property, threaten death and bodily harm to those who speak out against them, and they constantly fund terrorism throughout the world. In Syria they have burnt an embassy, in Europe Muslims have been responsible for murdering people who have written out against Islam or made movies, and other forms of art. These actions are also approved by Islamic teachers (Imams) and religious leaders, not just undertaken by warped loners claiming to represent Islam quite against the will of the majority or authority.

With this ridiculous cartoon issue, we have seen that Islam has no sense of perspective. In the west parody or satire is seen as not only common, but completely harmless for the most part. And religion is not immune to parody and satire, though even in the west most people are often uncomfortable with religious satire. Usually only people filled with hate attack religion in parody and most in the West instinctively know this. As a result, most people dismiss such parody as foolishness and bad taste.

But with Muslims overreacting — in western eyes at least — to this silly cartoon issue in the way they have, it becomes nearly impossible for Westerners to view Islam as a peaceful religion, but more as a vicious hate group itself. And that perception is justified with the actions that Muslims have increasingly perpetrated over the ensuing years. So, we find that Islam presents a danger to the safety of the populace all too often. It is violent, oppressive, and reactionary.

But, what is to be done about it? We have been raised to feel that religion should be left untouched by government. Freedom of religion is at the very core of our beliefs. And this concept is an important one to uphold. So, how can we honestly and without hypocrisy begin to look toward making Islam illegal?

There is a parallel of sorts in the USA that might be used as a template for action. The Ku klux Klan.

After the Civil War ended, the KKK arose from the ashes of war as an advocacy group for the disenfranchised white voter in the south. But it quickly became a terrorist organization bent on taking out revenge on the south's newly freed black population for having lost the war. It got so bad that even one of the original organizers, C.S. Cavalry General Nathan Bedford Forrest, denounced the organization and quit it in disgust.

But as the late 1800s rolled on and the south began to re-enter the Union as full partners in government, the KKK began to lose steam and prominence. For a time it subsided. But as the 20th century neared, it re-emerged and this time became a nationwide and powerful force taking on the flavor of religious, civic and racial duty. The KKK became invested in government and claimed millions of members nation wide.

In the 1920s, however, it became too much for a liberty loving country to allow the KKK to any longer exist. In Indiana, the entire state government was scandalized by their fealty to Indiana's Klan leader who had raped and beaten his secretary on a train trip. Violence against and frequent lynching of southern blacks became so pervasive that Congress finally acted and banned the Klan. The organization collapsed never again to reclaim the power and prominence it once had.

Now, the KKK has always based its precepts on Christianity, as well as racial identity. It also reacted with violence, rallies, death threats and killing when it was threatened. It careened far away from being a mere "idea" or religious theology and became a terrorist organization. And it became a terrorist organization even though literally millions of Americans that belonged to or identified with the Klan were not themselves violent, evil, or dangerous citizens.

The leadership of the Klan supported violence. The leadership preached violence. The leadership planned and fomented it. Therefore, it had to go because it became a danger to every law-abiding citizen, whether they agreed with the racial and religious concepts the Klan espoused or not.

Islam has become the KKK of the 21st century. The sooner we awake to this truth and take steps to ban the religion, or somehow curtail its pernicious influence the better. The west is going to have to put sever restrictions on Islamic Mosques and public display of Islam. Further, devout Muslims should not be allowed to hold public office (though it certainly should not become a racial issue — sins of the father should not be visited upon the sons).

This is no religious purge as in centuries past. In the past religions were banned to be replaced by the state sponsored sect and believers of the banned religion were mistreated, tortured, unduly taxed, and terrorized. This is absolutely not the model the west would follow by banning aspects of Islam today. No religion is replacing Islam and no one is suggesting that Muslims be mistreated. But the creed to which they hold is fast becoming the most dangerous one in the world today. It is a fine line that we walk to consider banning Islam, but the safety of society is at risk not to do so.

This is not an easy conclusion at which to arrive. But if we continue to turn a blind eye to the danger that Islam presents to the west, we are signing our own death warrants.

The KKK was put down in the USA and made powerless for the same reason. Communism was destroyed for the same reason, as well. Islam is a danger to the world.

Unfortunately, it is just that simple.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: islam; muslim; sharia; wot; yes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 681-700701-720721-740 ... 1,021-1,030 next last
Comment #701 Removed by Moderator

To: najida

"Honestly, more harm has come to me at the hand of CINO's than Muslims."

Hmmm....didn't see Christians in your list....you changing gears on me?


702 posted on 02/20/2006 5:07:27 PM PST by griffin (Love Jesus, No Fear!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 698 | View Replies]

To: COEXERJ145
I should be amazed that many on here support pissing on the Constitution.

I agree. Those who are making excuses for radical Islam in its repudiation of the Constitution through the free exercise clause of the first amendment are certainly soiling that sacred document. But you and I both know they will not be dissuaded by reason and common sense.

703 posted on 02/20/2006 5:07:54 PM PST by JCEccles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 697 | View Replies]

To: MineralMan


But I maintain that insurgent Muslims are not majestic lions, who only kill to eat, but are all taught from the same book which incites them to kill the infidels! Christian-Judeo followers find it difficult to fathom the minds of those dedicated to take over the world for Allah.


704 posted on 02/20/2006 5:08:17 PM PST by Paperdoll (On the cutting edge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 632 | View Replies]

To: najida
"To: wvobiwan We can't lose sight of the fact that most Muslims DO NOT endorse terrorism... I cannot ignore the fact that most Muslims DO NOT publicly oppose Islamic terrorism.

643 posted on 02/20/2006 1:40:29 PM PST by delacoert [ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]

This one? Do you really think muslimes don't endorse terrorism?

705 posted on 02/20/2006 5:11:53 PM PST by griffin (Love Jesus, No Fear!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 698 | View Replies]

To: Paperdoll

Radical muslims are as majestic as mad dogs...should we let them run wild...or try to medicate?


706 posted on 02/20/2006 5:15:49 PM PST by Dark Skies ("Free speech is THE weapon of choice against islam.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 704 | View Replies]

To: Paperdoll

Radical muslims are as majestic as mad dogs...should we let them run wild...or try to medicate?


707 posted on 02/20/2006 5:15:58 PM PST by Dark Skies ("Free speech is THE weapon of choice against islam.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 704 | View Replies]

To: The Gallows Party
First internment camps then mass deportations back to their homelands -- that's the Gallows Party solution.

Interesting. And if their homeland happens to be the United States?

708 posted on 02/20/2006 5:16:03 PM PST by Wormwood (Iä! Iä! Cthulhu fhtagn!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 701 | View Replies]

Comment #709 Removed by Moderator

To: Wormwood
And if their homeland happens to be the United States?

And what is your answer for dealing with anti-Americans during war time...or are your saying we are not at war?

710 posted on 02/20/2006 5:19:31 PM PST by Dark Skies ("Free speech is THE weapon of choice against islam.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 708 | View Replies]

To: Wormwood
Get used to it. The Constitution is ignored every day in this country.

As for it's pertaining to Islam - Shouldn't the Mafia have the same rights? We can and will get Islam on RICO - sooner or later.

711 posted on 02/20/2006 5:19:42 PM PST by mad_as_he$$ (Never corner anything meaner than you. NSDQ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: bikepacker67

I can't agree with you more. Where is the hue and outcry from the "real" Muslims. The silence is deafening.


712 posted on 02/20/2006 5:22:46 PM PST by mad_as_he$$ (Never corner anything meaner than you. NSDQ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: The Gallows Party
Let's try it and see what happens


Do it now, or leave it to our kids to mop up.


I say do it now. I'm so sick of these crazy islama-b@$t@rd$ I'm ready to join up for the fight myself.
713 posted on 02/20/2006 5:24:24 PM PST by dagoofyfoot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 709 | View Replies]

To: Dark Skies
And what is your answer for dealing with anti-Americans during war time...or are your saying we are not at war?

The burden of proof is on the government to prove that an individual or a group is engaged in a criminal conspiracy. Pointing to a couple of passages in the Koran doesn't count.

714 posted on 02/20/2006 5:25:26 PM PST by Wormwood (Iä! Iä! Cthulhu fhtagn!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 710 | View Replies]

To: Dark Skies

One of my favorite hobbies is disposing of mad dogs. I only feel recoil when I do it.


715 posted on 02/20/2006 5:25:32 PM PST by mad_as_he$$ (Never corner anything meaner than you. NSDQ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 706 | View Replies]

To: mad_as_he$$
Where is the hue and outcry from the "real" Muslims


The "real" Muslims?


Oh, you mean like the one's who just voted in Hamas as their governing body...Yeah, those are the "real" Muslims, don't kid yourself by thinking anything different.
716 posted on 02/20/2006 5:27:42 PM PST by dagoofyfoot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 712 | View Replies]

To: Dark Skies; Fred Nerks
Are y'all still playing on this thread?

Lemme know or I'll go take another look at Saudi over on google earth... ;o)
717 posted on 02/20/2006 5:29:27 PM PST by USF (I see your Jihad and raise you a Crusade ™ © ®)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 706 | View Replies]

To: dagoofyfoot
You don't understand Hamas is the "real Muslim(s)". FWIW at least Pat Roberts denounces things he doesn't agree with. Yea sometime he sounds like an a$$ but at least he spoke up. No Mullah's speak up against "evil Muslim" - if they do I can't find it.
718 posted on 02/20/2006 5:30:24 PM PST by mad_as_he$$ (Never corner anything meaner than you. NSDQ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 716 | View Replies]

To: USF

I'm still here, but I had to take a long hot shower to wash off the appeasement.


719 posted on 02/20/2006 5:31:55 PM PST by Dark Skies ("Free speech is THE weapon of choice against islam.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 717 | View Replies]

To: griffin

Ok,
Add Christians to the list.

Seriously, in my long life....the meanest, cruelest, lewdest, most sexually deviant, most dishonest, most damaging people I've ever known were 'Christian' (yeah, yeah, I know they weren't really)....but hey....

In all the Muslims I've know...I've never met one who treated me as bad as a Christian.....

Ergo....I'm using the same logic. So I'm sitting here just bumfuzzled.

Personal experience.

Oh sorry, my post was 657....Just an example of 99.9999% of the types of conversations I'm familiar with.


720 posted on 02/20/2006 5:32:34 PM PST by najida (Me arguing for logic and against emotion is like Mother Teresa becoming a pole dancer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 702 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 681-700701-720721-740 ... 1,021-1,030 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson