Posted on 02/14/2006 8:07:22 PM PST by ncountylee
Feb. 14--The Bush administration was urged yesterday to take another look at a deal that would turn over operation of two marquee New York Harbor ports to Dubai, a nation with ties to the 9/11 hijackers.
The emirate-owned Dubai Ports World finalized a $6.8 billion deal yesterday to buy the English firm P&O Ports, which now runs Manhattan's cruise-ship terminal on the West Side and the Port Authority's Newark Container Port, as well as ports in New Orleans, Philadelphia, Baltimore and Miami.
"If a terrorist organization decided to infiltrate this company... what would stop them?" asked Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.).
Schumer said the Department of Homeland Security should slow down the deal, approved by the U.S. Treasury department's secretive Committee on Foreign Investment.
Dubai has become one of the White House's close allies in the war on terror, but many of the 9/11 hijackers passed through the country and had cash wired from there.
"Foreign control of our ports which are vital to homeland security is a risky proposition," Schumer said.
Ports are considered one of the nation's weakest security links, with only about 5 percent of the cargo coming in inspected.
City officials did not comment last night, but a PA spokesman said the agency agreed with Schumer.
"We need to take a real close look at security before we approve such a company," said Steve Coleman.
He said that as landlord, the PA could boot Dubai.
(Excerpt) Read more at redorbit.com ...
Every time? Brother. Gimmee a break.
First time I EVER heard CHUCK make any sense at all ..Bad idea on Bush's part for sure..What a dumb ass idea that is ..is he for real ? In NYC of all places too..UNREAL !!!!
Are you talking about COSCO/Long Beach deal? Only leasing property to a Communist Country. Here is a old article.
http://www.thenewamerican.com/tna/1997/vo13no10/vo13no10_cosco.htm
I despise schumer beyond description...let's just say when I hear him speak I want to barf...but now I find myself praising him as the only politician trying to save our ports from hamas control.
What can anyone say when the POTUS is willing to turnover our strategic ports to our sworn enemies? Make no mistake, muslims are our sworn enemies. Borders do not seem to be a Bush specialty and now he is selling our ports to muslim terrorists.
beam me up scotty
Back when BJ was in the White House (and totally unrelated to campaign contributions from the Peoples Republic, I'm sure), the Red Chinese tried to lease the port at Long Beach, CA. IIRC, both Boxer and Feinstein ultimately stepped up and opposed it. Here's what I saved on it, but I'm sure you can google for more >>>
http://www.conservativeusa.org/longbch.htm
Anyway, that deal stunk & was stopped. This deal stinks even more and needs bi-partisan killing.
BTTT!
thanks!
i thought it was "either you are with us or you're against us"
now its "either you're with us or we'll let you oversee our ports"
"i thought it was "either you are with us or you're against us"
Depends on how you define "us?"
Yah I'm with Chuckie on this one and that's very confusing to me.............
Port Authority, port authority....
Ah yes, the Port Authority that Charles Kushner was commissioner of....
The same Charles Kushner that sponsored Golan Cipel and helped get him in charge of NJ's homeland security....
Yes, I'm sure our port authority will be on this!
and that there are no deals with financial interests involved!
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1519343/posts
Dubai Royals Snatch Up Manhattan Real Estate
BUMP
Yes, Savage has been all over this, thank heavens.
Cricket, bumping this to you. Schumer of all people is speaking out!
Why is Schumer making sense and our President NOT making sense by allowing the convertibles to take over our ports?
What's to stop terrorist infiltration of the current companies?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.