Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The top 10 Hybrid myths (Autos alert)
Business Week ^ | 2/12/06 | B Berman

Posted on 02/13/2006 10:36:24 AM PST by voletti

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-152 next last

I borrowed a Prius for a few days last year. It really impressed me. I thought it'd be a dinky little car but it drove very well. Much better than most economy cars i'd driven. Because of the tall shape, the interior room was pretty good and the hatchback meant better luggage space than a sedan. The acceleration flat out isn't that great but because of the torque of the electric motor, the car feels quicker than it is. I averaged 54 MPG which wasn't up to what the sticker said but was still double what I average in my Accord. Its hard to drive that and not be impressed with the engineering talent of the Japanese. I wish the American companies could show themselves to be as innovative. I also wish Toyota would market an option to turn the car into a "plug-in" Hybrid. I've read a lot about the owners who have modified their cars to get 80 or 90 mpg (while still being as usable on long trips as a normal gas car) and I would buy a factory "plug-in" car in a heart beat for the savings on gas. Kinda nice to take money out of the pockets of Middle Eastern islamofascists and South American socialists like Chavez.


41 posted on 02/13/2006 11:22:57 AM PST by SmoothTalker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: FreePaul
"I remember the Wankel as being very poor on fuel economy."

You are correct. The Wankel problem was that it was very inefficient when accelerating. As a constant speed/torque engine it is great. I read where there was plans to make them for farm tractors which require constants speed . Also, I read a boating magazine a few years back where they had converted a boat to using them with electric generators. They powered electric motors which spun the propellers. The boat was very fuel efficient.
42 posted on 02/13/2006 11:25:54 AM PST by reagandemo (The battle is near are you ready for the sacrifice?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: RichardW

"I've never read of a single case where the battery pack had to be replaced.. . .I recently saw one on Ebay with 4 miles on the odometer when the car was totaled. It went for $455."

If they never need to be replaced, why is somebody shelling out $450 to buy one?


43 posted on 02/13/2006 11:29:25 AM PST by oldbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: voletti

Locomotives have used hybrid technology since the 1930's. Locomotives have a large diesel engine coupled to a generator. The electricity generated turns the motors in the trucks.

The engines will be more efficient because they can be designed to run at their most efficient speed. The regenerative braking is more efficient because it allows you to convert some of your kinetic energy into electric energy to recharge your batteries -- the current braking systems create heat energy, which is waste.

I hope we do start to get reliable, powerful and fuel efficient vehicles -- takes money from those scumbag arabs.


44 posted on 02/13/2006 11:32:01 AM PST by Londo Molari
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oldbill

Good question. My thought is that somebody thinks they either might get one "just in case" or they have succumbed to the hysteria about this batteries that somehow never fail. It's also called redundancy. Put one away for that rainy day. Personally, I'll cross that bridge when I get there. I seldom keep my vehicles that long anyway. I've owned 54 thus far in my lifetime. I just wanted to get one for the sheer pleasure of owning one.


45 posted on 02/13/2006 11:32:47 AM PST by RichardW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler
Hybrids are so passe. I heard on the Phil Hendry show about the latest technology: wind-powered cars.


46 posted on 02/13/2006 11:42:06 AM PST by Mannaggia l'America
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler
...wind-powered cars.

They have these in our area now.

I have seen a lot of cars with a label on their windshield or back window.

The label explains how it works. It says "FOR SALE".

47 posted on 02/13/2006 11:42:43 AM PST by Dan(9698)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: duckman

"I don't know how true this is, but I heard that it can cost upward of $4500.00 to have a battery pack replaced in the hybrids. Is this correct?"
No idea.


48 posted on 02/13/2006 11:43:31 AM PST by voletti (Awareness and Equanimity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler

"Hybrids are so passe. I heard on the Phil Hendry show about the latest technology: wind-powered cars"

LOL!
Solar powered cars are about as far away, I dare say.


49 posted on 02/13/2006 11:44:06 AM PST by voletti (Awareness and Equanimity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: HamiltonJay
Hybrids save ZERO gas/resources over well developed injected Diesel technology

Then make a diesel hybrid...
Oh wait, that is a train. I guess we already have those.

I agree that tax breaks are dumb. The drive for more hybrids should be all market conditions. They are not really a scam though.
50 posted on 02/13/2006 11:44:49 AM PST by TalonDJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: voletti

What happens when a hybrid gets creamed on the highway by say a large truck and the battery is ruptured ...wouldn't this be a Haz-Mat spill? Who will pay for the clean-up? When the hybrid is totalled or no longer serviceable how does the battery get disposed and who will pay for this disposal? How well do these vehicles perform under adverse conditions like below zero weather?


51 posted on 02/13/2006 11:45:51 AM PST by The Great RJ ("Mir wölle bleiwen wat mir sin" or "We want to remain what we are." ..Luxembourg motto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Londo Molari

Submarines ran on diesel and electric motors also.


52 posted on 02/13/2006 11:49:06 AM PST by XRdsRev (New Jersey is the Crossroads of the American Revolution 1775-1783)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: TalonDJ

Diesel Hybrids are for things like Busses, Trains and large heavy machinary that need the torque of electric motors throughout the range.. not simply to save gas. TDI for example meets or beats gas/electric hybrid all over the map.

A typical Diesel engine is abou 50% efficient vs about 35% effiecency for regular gasoline.... So add TDI to the mix, and you get even greater... its a better overall solution that the hybrid and it causes at the end of the day less impact to the environment... as we aren't dealing with chemical waste issues from battery manufacture and disposals... not to mention the added impact of the manufacture and disposal of all the additional equipment.


53 posted on 02/13/2006 11:53:23 AM PST by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: brwnsuga

The accuracy of the fuel economy as posted on the window sticker is similar to the accuracy of that posted on non-hybrids. That is to say they are wrong by between 15-20%


54 posted on 02/13/2006 11:53:31 AM PST by Eagles Talon IV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: domenad

If you could just get to work and home on a battery charge, why bother with gas?

Problem is that they've spent millions of dollars pushing the "don't need to plug in" theme. It'll be hard for them to offer now the negative they have marketed for years.

I want a plug in that'll give me a choice of how to best use the options. I'm retired and most of my trips are under 30 miles round trip. Why should I have to use ANY gas until I'm ready to take a longer trip. A choice makes sense but I guess that'd be asking too much. They think we're all too stupid to be offered a choice I guess.


55 posted on 02/13/2006 11:54:32 AM PST by Joan Kerrey (what support is Sinclair giving to a candidate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: domenad

That idea occurred to lots of people. There is a popular internet newsgroup of people who have been adding batteries to their Toyotas & plugging them in at night. The electric is alot cheaper than the gasoline. Such is the standard in different countries like Japan.

The greens & the EPA have their panties in a bunch over this. They have tried many ways to stop it. They are upset because it means than coal gets burned to power the cars.


56 posted on 02/13/2006 11:55:05 AM PST by FreeInWV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: cpdiii
An electric car that recharges from the power grid actually uses more energy in total than a gasoline engine.

OTOH, it's a lot easier to control point-source than automotive emissions - especially as conventional cars get older.

IF (and note I didn’t say WHEN) we discover in a decade or two that we have to start seriously cutting the amount of CO2 produced, then point source emissions control becomes a very important part of the equation, and it would be nice at that point to have had the experience of operating reasonably mature hybrid technologies at the automotive end of the chain.

So I appreciate the people who are willing to pay a bit extra participate in an experiment that many or may not prove important – and I get a bit ticked off at the person (unless he or she really has an objective need of such a vehicle) who makes fun of the guy in a Primus from the front seat of a conventionally powered full-size SUV or Pickup.

57 posted on 02/13/2006 11:56:35 AM PST by M. Dodge Thomas (More of the same, only with more zeros at the end.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: FreePaul
Mazda's Wankle is worse on fuel than most sports cars, but not a total guzzler. It burns a lot of oil - up to a quart per oil change - and the gas often floods in the cold. (Perhaps hydrogen will solve this?)

The horsepower was so lacking a couple years ago that dealers agreed to buy back cars from angry customers to avoid lawsuits (they apparently fudged the specifications slightly... "lied").

The 2006 has been re-tooled with a modest horsepower boost and improved gearing (optional 6-speed over past years' 4-speed). I love the interior:

http://multimedia.cars.com/evox/media/1809_inzm.mov

58 posted on 02/13/2006 12:03:33 PM PST by SteveMcKing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: domenad
If you could just get to work and home on a battery charge, why bother with gas?

Perhaps having one vehicle that can handle both the short daily commute and the longer weekend trips to see grandma, maybe?

59 posted on 02/13/2006 12:04:51 PM PST by Horkster (I'll wait for a hybrid 4x4 full size truck, first...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Eagles Talon IV
Should have been 11 myths. They left out the myth that Hybrids' actually get 50-60 miles per gallon as it says on the sticker.

You can say the same thing about many cars, hybrid or otherwise. The MPG methodology doesn't often reflect the real world.
60 posted on 02/13/2006 12:07:19 PM PST by conservative in nyc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-152 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson