Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sunday Morning Talk Show Thread 22 January 2006
Various big media television networks ^ | 22 January 2006 | Various Self-Serving Politicians and Big Media Screaming Faces

Posted on 01/22/2006 5:21:05 AM PST by Alas Babylon!

The Talk Shows



Sunday, January 22nd, 2006

Guests to be interviewed today on major television talk shows:

FOX NEWS SUNDAY (Fox Network): Sens. John McCain, R-Ariz., and Richard Durbin, D-Ill.; University of Maryland's men's basketball coach Gary Williams.

MEET THE PRESS (NBC): Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill.

FACE THE NATION (CBS): Sens. Pat Roberts, R-Kan., and Joe Lieberman, D-Conn.

THIS WEEK (ABC): John Kerry, D-Mass.; Reps. Peter Hoekstra, R-Mich., and Jane Harman, D-Calif., chairman and ranking Democrat of the House Intelligence Committee; actor Gary Sinise.

LATE EDITION (CNN) : Sens. George Allen, R-Va., and Charles Schumer, D-N.Y.; Pakistani Prime Minister Shaukat Aziz; formerUnited Nations Ambassador Richard Holbrooke; former Secretary of State Lawrence Eagleburger; South Korean Foreign Minister Ban Ki-moon.


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 109th; abramoff; durbin; eagleburger; facethenation; foxnewssunday; garysinise; georgeallen; guests; hoekstra; holbrooke; janeharman; kerry2008; lateedition; lieberman; lineup; mccain; meetthepress; nadler; obama; patroberts; schumer; sunday; talkshows; thisweek
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300 ... 541-560 next last
To: snugs

Thanks. I am sure of what you hope & also, Libby will come out free good also.


261 posted on 01/22/2006 7:44:28 AM PST by anita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 248 | View Replies]

To: All
Will You help keep the Candle Lit for our service men and women?
Can you spare a few moments today to either
e-mail them or learn about sending packages to them?
Many of them are away from home for the 1st time.
PLEASE Click on the graphic and help cheer them up.
You will stay right where you are on this thread while you write them.

262 posted on 01/22/2006 7:45:01 AM PST by 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub (Have you said Thank You to a Service Man or Woman today?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anita
A GQ atricle is quoted about Lurch. Three devasting quotes including Lockhart (his former press sec.)

LOL! just said he mortgaged his house tio finance his campaign.

As Sean would say, "Unbelievable!"

263 posted on 01/22/2006 7:45:13 AM PST by don-o
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 257 | View Replies]

To: montomike

oversees they are pushing the homo agenda claim that ALL cowboys engage in homosexual behavior because they are lonely. (ala some kind of bizzare prison fantasy)

I just wish fox with stay away from just barfing back the homosexual agenda of hollyweirds PR firms. If I wanted to watch homosexual news, I would watch CNN.


264 posted on 01/22/2006 7:45:24 AM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 226 | View Replies]

To: FreedomNeocon

I cannot imagine the danger we would be in if the president had let the traitors in congress know our methods of tracking terrorists.


265 posted on 01/22/2006 7:45:37 AM PST by OldFriend (The Dems enABLEd DANGER and 3,000 Americans died.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: mathluv

"W could get rid of 'appointments', but it is nearly impossible to get rid of 'career' people, thanks to their union."


W: "Here is your choice Clinton State Department drone, Early Retirement or reassignment to be the the door keeper at the embassy in Zimbabawa for the rest of your life."


266 posted on 01/22/2006 7:45:42 AM PST by MNJohnnie (Is there a satire god who created Al Gore for the sole purpose of making us laugh?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies]

To: Alas Babylon!
Kerry lied through his teeth this morning saying he didn't accept any Abramoff money. According to the Abramoff Democrat contribution list posted numerous times on Freerepublic:

Senator John Kerry (D-MA) Received At Least – $98,550.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1545902/posts

Durbin's excuse was that the Abramoff funds he accepted were unsolicited. (IOW, I didn't ask for money from the crook, he gave it to me, therefore it's ok. Besides, I gave most of it to charity after he got caught.)

267 posted on 01/22/2006 7:45:44 AM PST by FlyVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend
Truth be told, just about everything on FR ends up on talk radio.

You've noticed that as well....

268 posted on 01/22/2006 7:46:44 AM PST by don-o
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 255 | View Replies]

To: mathluv

I can just hear Paulsen saying that. His delivery was impeccable.


269 posted on 01/22/2006 7:46:46 AM PST by JennysCool (Non-Y2K-Compliant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 210 | View Replies]

To: don-o
Hey John, why not just go directly to the NYT?

LOL! Keep on making a fool of yoiurself, JFnK!
I haven't seen any of this yet...I'm recording most of them (except Bob S.)
I'm listening to the panel on FNS, but missed the first few minutes 'cause I turned my headphones off while Turbin was on.

270 posted on 01/22/2006 7:46:59 AM PST by meema (I am a Conservative Traditional Republican, NOT an elitist, sexist , cynic or right wing extremist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 246 | View Replies]

To: cardinal4; All

"Good Morning! John Kerry is running again, isnt he?"


For those who "forgot" what Hanoi Kerry
did in the past read on and learn the truth.

Hanoi Kerry was still a USNR officer while he:
gave false hearsay testimony to Congress
negotiated with the enemy
helped the US lose a war
abetted in the deaths of millions
created a hostile environment for all servicemen

http://ice.he.net/~freepnet/kerry/index.php?topic=Documents

Call to action!
Please help get this bill passed
AND signed into law
BEFORE the '06 elections!

Stolen Valor Act of 2005 (Introduced in House)
HR 3352 IH
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c109:h.r.3352:

Fax, call or write your representatives and MSM
Emails for Activism
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1388699/posts

Write your Congressman
http://www.house.gov/writerep/

PING every list you have!

Write every real Conservative Senator and Representative.

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c109:h.r.3352:

Spread the word far and wide.

This is a no brainer, conservatives control Congress
and the White House




Stolen Valor Act of 2005 (Introduced in House)
HR 3352 IH

109th CONGRESS

1st Session

H. R. 3352

To amend title 18, United States Code, with respect to protections for the Medal of Honor, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

July 19, 2005

Mr. SALAZAR introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend title 18, United States Code, with respect to protections for the Medal of Honor, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the `Stolen Valor Act of 2005'.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

Congress finds that--

(1) fraudulent claims surrounding receipt of the Medal of Honor, the Distinguished-Service Cross, the Air Force Cross, the Navy Cross, the Purple Heart, or any other medal or decoration awarded by Congress or the armed forces damage the reputation and meaning of these medals;

(2) Federal law enforcement officers are currently limited in their ability to prosecute fraudulent claims of receipt of military medals; and

(3) changes to the current statute are necessary to allow law enforcement personnel to protect the reputation and meaning of these medals.

SEC. 3. MILITARY MEDAL PROTECTIONS.

Section 704 of title 18, United States Code, is amended--

(1) in subsection (a)--

(A) by inserting `purchases, attempts to purchase, solicits for purchase, mails, ships, imports, exports, produces blank certificates of receipt,' after `wears'; and

(B) by inserting `attempts to sell, advertises for sale, trades, barters or exchanges for anything of value' after `sells';

(2) in subsection (b)(1), by inserting `or (b)' after `subsection (a)'

(3) by redesignating subsection (b) as subsection (c);

(4) by inserting after subsection (a) the following:

`(b) False Claims About Receipt of Military Medals- Whoever falsely represents himself or herself, verbally or in writing, to have been awarded any decoration or medal authorized by Congress for the armed forces of the United States, or any of the service medals or badges awarded to the members of such forces, or the ribbon, button, or rosette of any such badge, decoration or medal, or any colorable imitation thereof shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than six months, or both.'; and

(5) by adding at the end the following:

`(d) Other Medals- If a decoration or medal involved in an offense under subsection (a) or (b) is a Distinguished Service Cross awarded under Section 3742 of title 10, an Air Force Cross awarded under section 8742 of section 10, a Navy cross awarded under section 6242 of title 10, a silver star awarded under section 3746, 6244, or 8746 of title 10, or a Purple Heart awarded under section 1129 of title 10, or any replacement or duplicate medal as authorized by statute, in lieu of the punishment provided in that subsection, the offender shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 1 year, or both.'.



"From Ray Funderburk, MOPH

The greatest threat to the sanctity and significance of the Purple Heart comes from the medal's easy availability. Anyone can buy one at flea markets, pawnshops or on the Internet, where Web sites offer the decoration, no questions asked, for as little as $35. An accompanying certificate on onion skin parchment and personalized with your name and any rank you choose costs about $25.

Such commerce in the symbols of American courage and sacrifice would be outlawed by a measure spearheaded last July by Rep. John Salazar, D-Colo.

His "Stolen Valor Act" would make it a federal crime to falsely wear the Purple Heart and other top military decorations, or to even list them on a resume if they were not officially earned.

But the proposed bill now sits in the House Judiciary Committee, and its fate remains unclear.
"We're waiting for the committee to act," said Salazar

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1560750/posts?page=2#2




Any Republican or Democrat politicians who don't get this bill passed is
as guilty as the phonies that this bill targets.

The Swift Boat Vets already proved, beyond a doubt,
that hanoi kerry's 1st Purple Heart is fraudulent.

A US Attorney General can get ALL of hanoi kerry's
records and once and for all prove that the
Swift Boat Vets were accurate and true.

All that has to be done is to get this bill passed and signed into law now, before the '06 election.

Since hanoi kerry will be under indictment he'll
have to sit out the '06 election for his illegal seat
in the US Senate.

AND the best part is that it is a Democrat sponsored
bill that will his downfall.

COSPONSORS(60), ALPHABETICAL [followed by Cosponsors withdrawn]: (Sort: by date)

Rep Baca, Joe [CA-43] - 7/27/2005
Rep Baird, Brian [WA-3] - 7/28/2005
Rep Barrow, John [GA-12] - 7/27/2005
Rep Beauprez, Bob [CO-7] - 9/6/2005
Rep Berry, Marion [AR-1] - 7/27/2005
Rep Boren, Dan [OK-2] - 7/27/2005
Rep Boswell, Leonard L. [IA-3] - 7/27/2005
Rep Boyd, Allen [FL-2] - 7/27/2005
Rep Calvert, Ken [CA-44] - 9/6/2005
Rep Cardoza, Dennis A. [CA-18] - 7/27/2005
Rep Case, Ed [HI-2] - 7/27/2005
Rep Chandler, Ben [KY-6] - 7/27/2005
Rep Cooper, Jim [TN-5] - 7/27/2005
Rep Costa, Jim [CA-20] - 7/28/2005
Rep Cramer, Robert E. (Bud), Jr. [AL-5] - 7/27/2005
Rep Cuellar, Henry [TX-28] - 7/27/2005
Rep Davis, Geoff [KY-4] - 7/26/2005
Rep Davis, Lincoln [TN-4] - 7/27/2005
Rep Filner, Bob [CA-51] - 7/26/2005
Rep Gonzalez, Charles A. [TX-20] - 7/29/2005
Rep Green, Gene [TX-29] - 7/28/2005
Rep Grijalva, Raul M. [AZ-7] - 7/26/2005
Rep Gutierrez, Luis V. [IL-4] - 7/28/2005
Rep Hastings, Alcee L. [FL-23] - 7/26/2005
Rep Herseth, Stephanie [SD] - 7/27/2005
Rep Hinojosa, Ruben [TX-15] - 7/28/2005
Rep Holden, Tim [PA-17] - 7/27/2005
Rep Honda, Michael M. [CA-15] - 7/28/2005
Rep Israel, Steve [NY-2] - 7/27/2005
Rep Kline, John [MN-2] - 7/28/2005
Rep Lewis, Ron [KY-2] - 7/28/2005
Rep Marshall, Jim [GA-3] - 11/2/2005
Rep Matheson, Jim [UT-2] - 7/26/2005
Rep McDermott, Jim [WA-7] - 9/7/2005
Rep McIntyre, Mike [NC-7] - 9/14/2005
Rep Meek, Kendrick B. [FL-17] - 7/26/2005
Rep Melancon, Charlie [LA-3] - 7/27/2005
Rep Menendez, Robert [NJ-13] - 10/6/2005
Rep Michaud, Michael H. [ME-2] - 7/27/2005
Rep Moore, Dennis [KS-3] - 7/27/2005
Rep Musgrave, Marilyn N. [CO-4] - 10/17/2005
Rep Napolitano, Grace F. [CA-38] - 7/27/2005
Rep Northup, Anne M. [KY-3] - 9/15/2005
Rep Ortiz, Solomon P. [TX-27] - 7/28/2005
Rep Peterson, Collin C. [MN-7] - 7/27/2005
Rep Pomeroy, Earl [ND] - 7/27/2005
Rep Reyes, Silvestre [TX-16] - 7/27/2005
Rep Rogers, Harold [KY-5] - 9/7/2005
Rep Ross, Mike [AR-4] - 7/27/2005
Rep Ryan, Tim [OH-17] - 7/26/2005
Rep Schiff, Adam B. [CA-29] - 7/27/2005
Rep Serrano, Jose E. [NY-16] - 7/29/2005
Rep Strickland, Ted [OH-6] - 9/27/2005
Rep Tancredo, Thomas G. [CO-6] - 9/6/2005
Rep Tanner, John S. [TN-8] - 7/27/2005
Rep Taylor, Gene [MS-4] - 7/27/2005
Rep Thompson, Mike [CA-1] - 7/27/2005
Rep Udall, Mark [CO-2] - 7/22/2005
Rep Velazquez, Nydia M. [NY-12] - 7/28/2005
Rep Whitfield, Ed [KY-1] - 9/20/2005

There is no valid reason why this bill can't pass both Houses of Congress
and be signed by President Bush
BEFORE the '06 elections.


271 posted on 01/22/2006 7:47:04 AM PST by 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub (The "Politically Correct RINO's" on Free Republic are never really political or correct.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Jake The Goose
"John McCain is unstable. John McCain is freaking nuts!"

Hear hear! (that's why he's pandering to liberals; he can't win on the Republican vote)

272 posted on 01/22/2006 7:47:38 AM PST by cake_crumb (Leftist Credo: One Wing to Rule them All and to the Darkside Bind them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies]

To: Mo1

Obama wrote an email that raised $800,000 for Senator Bryd's reelection ??

HAHAHAHAHA .. He messed up Moveon.org's name .. called them Moveon.com


273 posted on 01/22/2006 7:47:41 AM PST by Mo1 (Republicans protect Americans from Terrorists.. Democrats protect Terrorists from Americans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 250 | View Replies]

To: slapshot

I agree with you - however - I think the idea that he is a threat to anyone's prospects is false.

He is a total fake - his base is very very small.


274 posted on 01/22/2006 7:47:44 AM PST by Jake The Goose (McCain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 253 | View Replies]

To: don-o

That's some more of sKerry's spin. First, the President has the power under the Constitution to do the wiretapping and second, he has kept some members of Congress informed about this (if Kerry wasn't one of them TOO BAD!).

I'm certainly no constitutional authority and know that there are always arguments on both sides of almost every issue, but found the following interesting and others may as well:

"For constitutional purposes, the joint resolution passed with but a single dissenting vote by Congress on Sept. 14, 2001, was the equivalent of a formal declaration of war. The Supreme Court held in 1800 (Bas v. Tingy), and again in 1801 (Talbot v. Seamen), that Congress could formally authorize war by joint resolution without passing a formal declaration of war; and in the post-U.N. Charter era no state has issued a formal declaration of war. Such declarations, in fact, have become as much an anachronism as the power of Congress to issue letters of marque and reprisal (outlawed by treaty in 1856). Formal declarations were historically only required when a state was initiating an aggressive war, which today is unlawful.

Section 1811 of the FISA statute recognizes that during a period of authorized war the president must have some authority to engage in electronic surveillance "without a court order." The question is whether Congress had the power to limit such authorizations to a 15-day period, which I think highly doubtful. It would be akin to Congress telling the president during wartime that he could attack a particular enemy stronghold for a maximum of 15 days."

Here are some other snippets from the article:

For nearly 200 years it was understood by all three branches that intelligence collection--especially in wartime--was an exclusive presidential prerogative vested in the president by Article II, Section 1 of the Constitution. Washington, Madison, Jefferson, Hamilton, John Marshall and many others recognized that the grant of "executive power" to the president included control over intelligence gathering. It was not by chance that there was no provision for congressional oversight of intelligence matters in the National Security Act of 1947.

>snip

Keep in mind that while the Carter administration asked Congress to enact the FISA statute in 1978, Attorney General Griffin Bell emphasized that the law "does not take away the power of the president under the Constitution." And in 1994, when the Clinton administration invited Congress to expand FISA to cover physical as well as electronic searches, the associate attorney general testified: "Our seeking legislation in no way should suggest that we do not believe we have inherent authority" under the Constitution. "We do," she concluded.

I'm not saying that what the president authorized was unquestionably lawful. The Supreme Court in the 1972 "Keith case" held that a warrant was required for national security wiretaps involving purely domestic targets, but expressly distinguished the case from one involving wiretapping "foreign powers" or their agents in this country. In the 1980 Truong case, the Fourth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the warrantless surveillance of a foreign power, its agent or collaborators (including U.S. citizens) when the "primary purpose" of the intercepts was for "foreign intelligence" rather than law enforcement purposes. Every court of appeals that has considered the issue has upheld an inherent presidential power to conduct warrantless foreign intelligence searches; and in 2002 the U.S. Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review, created by the FISA statute, accepted that "the president does have that authority" and noted "FISA could not encroach on the president's constitutional power."

>snip

Our Constitution is the supreme law, and it cannot be amended by a simple statute like the FISA law. Every modern president and every court of appeals that has considered this issue has upheld the independent power of the president to collect foreign intelligence without a warrant. The Supreme Court may ultimately clarify the competing claims; but until then, the president is right to continue monitoring the communications of our nation's declared enemies, even when they elect to communicate with people within our country.

Mr. Turner, co-founder of the Center for National Security Law at the University of Virginia School of Law, served as counsel to the President's Intelligence Oversight Board, 1982-84.


275 posted on 01/22/2006 7:48:17 AM PST by Seattle Conservative (God bless and protect our troops and their CIC. (Go Seahawks!!!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 246 | View Replies]

To: Gillmeister

Osama Obama had already given her heinous dispensation on the plantation remark.


276 posted on 01/22/2006 7:48:42 AM PST by OldFriend (The Dems enABLEd DANGER and 3,000 Americans died.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: FlyVet

Isn't amazing how no one ever points out that it is the Bush DOJ that is breaking this all open by prosecuting Abramoff.


277 posted on 01/22/2006 7:49:39 AM PST by MNJohnnie (Is there a satire god who created Al Gore for the sole purpose of making us laugh?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 267 | View Replies]

To: Seattle Conservative

Good stuff. This will blow up in the Dems faces, provided that the Reps keep firing back. Key point is going back to the loose lips in the Congress and other places.


278 posted on 01/22/2006 7:52:52 AM PST by don-o
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 275 | View Replies]

To: A.Hun
I have posted on several other threads that I believe her heinous latest pandering is designed to give her a big senate election vote so she is seen as viable in her presidential run.

She pandered to the blacks and a few days later pandered to her jewish constituents by demanding the President IMMEDIATELY do something about Iran.

If she makes a poor showing in NY her presidential prospects are lowered.

279 posted on 01/22/2006 7:53:02 AM PST by OldFriend (The Dems enABLEd DANGER and 3,000 Americans died.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: LibLieSlayer

You have the best firewall. Look how well it protects you! LOLOLOL


280 posted on 01/22/2006 7:53:59 AM PST by OldFriend (The Dems enABLEd DANGER and 3,000 Americans died.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300 ... 541-560 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson