Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gay 'marriage' ban struck
The Washington Times ^ | January 21, 2006 | S. A. Miller

Posted on 01/21/2006 8:23:11 PM PST by MediaAnalyst

BALTIMORE -- A Circuit Court judge yesterday ruled that Maryland's 33-year-old ban on same-sex "marriage" is unconstitutional.

- snip -

"After much study and serious reflection, this court holds that Maryland's statutory prohibition against same-sex marriage cannot withstand this constitutional challenge," Judge Murdock said in her 22-page ruling. The law defining marriage as a union of a man and a woman violates the state constitution's Equal Rights Amendment, which guarantees "equality of rights under the law shall not be abridged or denied because of sex," the judge said.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; US: Maryland
KEYWORDS: bigsigh; gay; homosexualagenda; homotrollsonfr; marriage; paulcjesup; pervertperverts; perverts; pervertspervert; ruling; samesexmarriage
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240241-255 last
To: JCEccles; Barnacle
Then again, he has no difficulty redefining words (such as monogamy)

Take it up with dictionary.reference.com I am using their meaning for the word "monogamous": "The practice or condition of having a single sexual partner during a period of time." http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=monogamous&db=*

241 posted on 01/23/2006 7:03:36 AM PST by Paul C. Jesup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: Sir Francis Dashwood
Paul C Jesup: I stated that 'morality' is subjective in that it individually deals with each person's own 'moral' code of right and wrong.

Sir Francis Dashwood: No you did not, you said this:

Morality is shades of gray.

Actually, in my post 139 I also stated: "Morality is a subjective concept that has been argued over since the dawn of humanity, on the other hand logic in 'cause and effect' is as hard as concrete."

You cannot even keep your attacks straight.

I guess you cannot accept the true meaning of the word "monogamous".

242 posted on 01/23/2006 7:09:18 AM PST by Paul C. Jesup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: Barnacle

I am asking reasons for a person's position on something in a calm, polite manner and no one seems to want to answer my question. How else besides divorse, child support laws, feminism and cheating on their sponse, can the institution of marraige be threatened between a man and woman than to be prevented from them getting married.


243 posted on 01/23/2006 7:14:03 AM PST by Paul C. Jesup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: Paul C. Jesup
I guess you cannot accept the true meaning of the word "monogamous".

Monogamous means two of different genders dedicated exclusively as mates. Homosexuals cannot mate, they have no potential to breed with each other at all.

_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-

Actually, in my post 139 I also stated...

Another equivocation. What you stated is unlearned ignorance of literature, philosophy, mythology and/or theology.

Morality is rooted entirely in the presupposition that some higher power defines what is correct for human behavior. It is no different than the pantheons of pagan gods and stone idols in primitive civilizations.

Morality does not exist, it is an esoteric hobgoblin, a phantasm that has no substance.

244 posted on 01/23/2006 12:11:55 PM PST by Sir Francis Dashwood (LET'S ROLL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 242 | View Replies]

To: Sir Francis Dashwood
Monogamous means two of different genders dedicated exclusively as mates. Homosexuals cannot mate, they have no potential to breed with each other at all.

No, "monogamous" means, "The practice or condition of having a single sexual partner during a period of time.": http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=monogamous&db=*

I don't see the word "gender" anywhere in dictionary.reference.com meanings of the noun word "monogamous".

245 posted on 01/23/2006 12:15:36 PM PST by Paul C. Jesup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 244 | View Replies]

To: MilspecRob
How would an animal give consent?

Haven't you ever seen a dog hump a leg?

246 posted on 01/23/2006 4:13:01 PM PST by fwdude (The worst advice you can give some people is "Be yourself")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: Paul C. Jesup
Your question is meaningless, pointless.

Homosexuals cannot reproduce. Marriage exists to give a stable framework within which the human species can reproduce and rear children to adulthood. So calling a homosexual coupling a "marriage" is worse than illogical. It is stupid and insulting.

Your question is akin to asking, "If I call a rat a bird, how does that prevent you from calling an osprey a bird?"

It doesn't. But it doesn't prove whatever pathetic point you seem to think it proves, either.

Pure idiocy.

247 posted on 01/23/2006 5:26:09 PM PST by JCEccles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 243 | View Replies]

To: Paul C. Jesup

"Homosexuals" (which is a misnomer to start with) never have "sex," they are deviants who have perverted relations.

Sex requires a penis and vagina. Monogamy requires a male and female, so does procreation...

But since you are so ignorant of biology, I will make it simple:

Man + woman = baby... mono-gamos

Man + 2 women = babies... poly-gamos

See, that is not so hard... “gamos,” from the latin, also denotes fertility, something homosexuals never have. Their relationship is sterile and perverse, producing nothing at all.


248 posted on 01/23/2006 5:40:43 PM PST by Sir Francis Dashwood (LET'S ROLL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 245 | View Replies]

To: Paul C. Jesup
I am asking reasons for a person's position on something in a calm, polite manner and no one seems to want to answer my question.

I applaud your calm politeness. Just throw a little logic in there and you got it made.

How else besides divorse, child support laws, feminism and cheating on their sponse, can the institution of marraige be threatened between a man and woman than to be prevented from them getting married.

Whatever.

249 posted on 01/23/2006 6:43:35 PM PST by Barnacle (The Democrat Party consists of a gaggle of criminal defense attorneys, and their clients.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 243 | View Replies]

To: VeniVidiVici

now they are saying "sex" equals "sexual behavior"

The left is burring themselves by grossing out the 98% of the normal population.


250 posted on 01/23/2006 6:59:15 PM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Barnacle
I applaud your calm politeness.

Thank you.

Just throw a little logic in there and you got it made.

I did state my reasoning for my opinions, it's sad that you do not understand the logic I have stated.

251 posted on 01/23/2006 7:19:36 PM PST by Paul C. Jesup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 249 | View Replies]

To: Paul C. Jesup
You truly have run out of constructive things to say.

Actually - I have been having ISP problems. I will respond to anything still 'active' when I get my internet connection issues resolved.

;-)

252 posted on 01/24/2006 7:58:53 AM PST by DBeers (†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 240 | View Replies]

To: DBeers
Actually - I have been having ISP problems. I will respond to anything still 'active' when I get my internet connection issues resolved.

Good luck with that, I usually find that ISP problems are solved by reseting the at-home router/internet modem.

253 posted on 01/24/2006 8:05:42 AM PST by Paul C. Jesup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 252 | View Replies]

To: DirtyHarryY2K; wagglebee; little jeremiah
You should've taken the liberty to ping the list. lj is going to be busy for the next month or so and Sometimes I have to leave on a moments notice and be out of town on jobs for a few days. You can help with the list and Wagglebee can be third stringer in case we both get sidelined. Sound like a good plan to you guys?

Yes -my understanding is that I will in essence be second string pinger for the homosexual agenda ping list. I have been having internet issue the last 3 or 4 days problems getting online. It seems the problems are resolved now...

254 posted on 01/25/2006 8:29:24 AM PST by DBeers (†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: DirtyHarryY2K

Got it! I saw on another thread that DBeers was having trouble with his internet connection.


255 posted on 01/25/2006 10:30:13 AM PST by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240241-255 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson