[Paul C. Jesup]

I am asking reasons for a person's position on something in a calm, polite manner and no one seems to want to answer my question. How else besides divorse, child support laws, feminism and cheating on their sponse, can the institution of marraige be threatened between a man and woman than to be prevented from them getting married.

[JCEccles]

Your question is meaningless, pointless.

Homosexuals cannot reproduce. Marriage exists to give a stable framework within which the human species can reproduce and rear children to adulthood. So calling a homosexual coupling a "marriage" is worse than illogical. It is stupid and insulting.

Your question is akin to asking, "If I call a rat a bird, how does that prevent you from calling an osprey a bird?"

It doesn't. But it doesn't prove whatever pathetic point you seem to think it proves, either.

Pure idiocy.

[Barnacle]

I am asking reasons for a person's position on something in a calm, polite manner and no one seems to want to answer my question.

I applaud your calm politeness. Just throw a little logic in there and you got it made.

How else besides divorse, child support laws, feminism and cheating on their sponse, can the institution of marraige be threatened between a man and woman than to be prevented from them getting married.

Whatever.