Skip to comments.
REDACTION LOOPHOLE: ACCESS TO THE BARRETT REPORT
Barrett report, CSPAN, Robert Novak
| 1.20.06
| Mia T
Posted on 01/20/2006 1:47:53 AM PST by Mia T
REDACTION LOOPHOLE: ACCESS TO THE BARRETT REPORT
- by Mia T, 01.20.06
he judges who ostensibly redacted 120 pages of the Barrett report established a means by which the American people can see those redactions: Any member of Congress can legally request access to the redactions and can publish them..
The serious '"culture of corruption" in the clinton DOJ and IRS that is detailed by the report makes one wonder about the nature of the crimes and abuse that the clintons felt compelled to redact.
Even a small subset of what we do know about the redactions argues for their immediate disclosure by Congress. (Only in the surreal world of the clintons would someone suggest with a straight face that disclosure of the crime of obstruction of justice is precluded by privacy considerations.)
We know that clinton pettifoggers labored mightily and long to gut and bury this report with some 140 motions, sleights of hand... and, when necessary, the clintons' heavy hand.
We know that charges of the clintons' retaliatory IRS audits of both their political foes and their victims of rape and predation are said to be included in the redacted material.
The mutual protection racket writ large is apparently alive and well in DC. (Is Filegate rearing its ugly head yet again?)
We mustn't let Congress get away with this coverup. Call. E-mail. Fax. Don't let up.
And remember the responses on Election Day.
|
deconstructing clinton
"just because I could"
(viewing movie requires Flash Player 7, available HERE)
FOOL ME ONCE, SHAME ON YOU! FOOL ME TWICE, SHAME ON ME!
-
|
December 7, 1941+64
AN OPEN LETTER TO TIM ROBBINS, DAVID GEFFEN, CHRIS MATTHEWS, MAUREEN DOWD + JEANINE PIRRO
RE: a not-so-modest proposal concerning hillary clinton
Dear Concerned Americans,
Hillary Clinton's revisionist tome notwithstanding, 'living history' begets a certain symmetry. It is in that light that I make this not-so-modest proposal on this day, exactly 64 years after the attack on Pearl Harbor.
The context of our concern today--regardless of political affiliation--is Iraq and The War on Terror, but the larger fear is that our democracy may not survive.
We have the requisite machines, power and know-how to defeat the enemy in Iraq and elsewhere, but do we have the will?
In particular, do we have the will to identify and defeat the enemy in our midst?
Answerable to no one, heir apparent in her own mind, self-serving in the extreme, Hillary Clinton incarnates this insidious new threat to our survival.
What we decide to do about Missus Clinton will tell us much about what awaits us in these perilous new times.
COMPLETE LETTER
December 7, 1941+64 Mia T AN OPEN LETTER TO TIM ROBBINS, DAVID GEFFEN, CHRIS MATTHEWS, MAUREEN DOWD + JEANINE PIRRO RE: a not-so-modest proposal concerning hillary clinton
|
|
-
COPYRIGHT MIA T 2006
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: New York; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: audit; barrettreport; bill; broaddrick; clinton; clintons; cultureofcorruption; hillary; irs; rape; retaliatoryaudit; willey
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-131 next last
1
posted on
01/20/2006 1:47:59 AM PST
by
Mia T
To: jla; WorkingClassFilth; Gail Wynand; Brian Allen; Wolverine; Lonesome in Massachussets; IVote2; ...
2
posted on
01/20/2006 1:53:51 AM PST
by
Mia T
(Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
To: UWSrepublican
3
posted on
01/20/2006 1:57:39 AM PST
by
Mia T
(Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
To: Mia T
4
posted on
01/20/2006 2:02:47 AM PST
by
peyton randolph
(As long is it does me no harm, I don't care if one worships Elmer Fudd.)
To: peyton randolph
5
posted on
01/20/2006 2:03:26 AM PST
by
Mia T
(Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
To: Mia T
Is there one single member of Congress out of the entire 535 that is loyal enough to the American people that he will see this released in full?
If there were a way I could bet against it I would. I don't think that in the entirety of Congress there is such a person.
To: Mia T
All a congressman has to do is leak it to the NYT.
Then they will run with it.
7
posted on
01/20/2006 2:11:53 AM PST
by
Notwithstanding
(I love my German shepherd - Benedict XVI reigns!)
To: thoughtomator
bump
I suppose this is a test. We shall soon find out....
This is the reason we must get rid of the careerist and replace him with the citizen-politician.
8
posted on
01/20/2006 2:12:01 AM PST
by
Mia T
(Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
To: thoughtomator
9
posted on
01/20/2006 2:15:05 AM PST
by
RavenATB
(Patton was right...)
To: Mia T; Tony Snow
Any member of Congress can legally request access to the redactions and can publish them.. Wonderful. Who shall make the request?
This is a ch__ch. What's missing?
10
posted on
01/20/2006 2:25:55 AM PST
by
rdb3
(What it is is what it was.)
To: rdb3
11
posted on
01/20/2006 2:43:53 AM PST
by
MonroeDNA
(Look for the union label--on the bat crashing through your windshield!)
To: thoughtomator
Is Ron Paul still in office?
12
posted on
01/20/2006 2:52:49 AM PST
by
muir_redwoods
(Free Sirhan Sirhan, after all, the bastard who killed Mary Jo Kopechne is walking around free)
To: Mia T
Thanks Mia T, If no member of congress will release this report it will say volumes about supporting the two parties - is there really an unseen power in Wash DC that truly runs the country?? and the politicians are just puppets? very troubling if this cover-up continues.
13
posted on
01/20/2006 2:55:25 AM PST
by
ConsentofGoverned
(if a sucker is born every minute, what are the voters?)
To: Mia T
My guess is that we'll see our dauntless Republicans sit by and dlinch under corruption and spying charges the Dems try to fling at them in this election year, while they "nobly" keep this report buried.
In case the foregoing was too vague:
HEY, DIMWITS. IF THEY CONTINUE TO SLIME YOU WITH THIS "CORRUPTION" CRAP, RELEASE THIS REPORT AND SHOW AMERICA WHO IS CORRUPT AND WHO INAPPROPRIATELY ABUSED THEIR POWER TO SPY ON ORDINARY CITIZENS.
Sheesh. There's no hope for these idiots.
To: Mia T
15
posted on
01/20/2006 2:59:04 AM PST
by
E.G.C.
To: muir_redwoods
I believe so. But he may not be willing to take the heat on this one.
To: Mia T
I emailed my Senator (Lindsay Graham) yesterday. I may call his office today.
17
posted on
01/20/2006 3:08:11 AM PST
by
visualops
(www.visualops.com)
To: ConsentofGoverned; rdb3
My theory that the two parties are better friends to each other than either one is to the American people will have an excellent test in this one.
To: thoughtomator
My theory that the two parties are better friends to each other...Yeah, yeah, yeah. Heard that a thousand times before.
This is a ch__ch. What's missing?
19
posted on
01/20/2006 3:14:25 AM PST
by
rdb3
(What it is is what it was.)
To: Mia T
I just read it and bookmarked it to use as future evidence in discussion with idiot liberals, thanks.
20
posted on
01/20/2006 3:16:16 AM PST
by
marta R
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-131 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson